Contradictory data exist regarding optimal methods and instruments for intimate partner violence (IPV) screening in primary care settings. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal method and screening instrument for IPV among men and women in a primary-care resident clinic. We conducted a cross-sectional study at an urban, academic, internal medicine residency continuity clinic in Connecticut among English or Spanish speaking adult patients. One group of patients ( n = 340) received a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) containing the partner violence screen (PVS) and the Hurt, Insulted, Threatened or Screamed at Questionnaire (HITS). A second group (n = 126) was screened with PVS and HITS by their primary care providers during face-to-face (FTF) clinical encounters. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between IPV prevalence and screening method (SAQ or FTF) after adjusting for socio-demographic effects. The overall IPV prevalence was 17.3% using the SAQ and 9.0% with FTF screening (p = .008). Patients receiving the SAQ were more likely to report IPV than those who were screened FTF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-5.6). This effect persisted for women, who had a higher odds of IPV when screened through a SAQ than when screened FTF (AOR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.4-8.6). Men did not differ in reporting IPV between methods: 11% with SAQ versus 9.4% FTF (p = .69). In internal medicine residency continuity clinics, a SAQ for IPV may result in higher disclosure and completion rates among female patients compared to FTF screening. Unique screening instruments and methods may be needed for men.
Ahmad, F., Hogg-Johnson, S., Stewart, D.E., Skinner, H.A., Glazier, R.H., & Levinson, W. ( 2009). Computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence and control: A randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine , 151, 93-102.
2.
American Association of Family Practice. ( 1994). Family violence: An AAFP white paper. The AAFP Commission on Special Issues and Clinical Interests. American Family Physician, 50, 1636-1640, 1644-1646.
3.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ( 1995). ACOG technical bulletin. Domestic violence. Number 209 to August 1995 (Replaces no. 124, January 1989). International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 51, 161-170.
4.
American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. (1992). Physicians and domestic violence. Ethical considerations. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3190-3193.
5.
Anderst, J., Hill, T.D., & Siegel, R.M. ( 2004). A comparison of domestic violence screening methods in a pediatric office. Clinical Pediatrics ( Philadelphia), 43, 103-105.
6.
Bauer, H.M., Rodriguez, M.A., Quiroga, S.S., & Flores-Ortiz, Y.G. (2000). Barriers to health care for abused Latina and Asian immigrant women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 11, 33-44.
7.
Chen, P.H., Rovi, S., Washington, J., Jacobs, A., Vega, M., & Pan, K.Y. ( 2007). Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice. Annals of Family Medicine, 5, 430-435.
8.
DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B.D., & Smith, J. ( 2007). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2006 (CPR, P60-233). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
9.
Ernst, A.A., Nick, T.G., Weiss, S.J., Houry, D., & Mills, T. ( 1997). Domestic violence in an inner-city ED. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 30, 190-197.
10.
Feder, G.S., Hutson, M., Ramsay, J., & Taket, A.R. ( 2006). Women exposed to intimate partner violence: Expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: A meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 22-37.
11.
Feldhaus, K.M., Koziol-McLain, J., Amsbury, H.L., Norton, I.M., Lowenstein, S.R., & Abbott, J.T. ( 1997). Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1357-1361.
12.
Glass, N., Dearwater, S., & Campbell, J. ( 2001). Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: Data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 27, 141-149.
13.
Hamby, S.L., & Gray-Little, B. (1997). Responses to partner violence: Moving away from deficit models. Journal of Family Psychology , 11, 339-350.
14.
Intermedia. (2006). When injuries speak who will listen? A health-care response to domestic violence [DVD]. Seattle, WA: Author.
15.
Kapur, N.A., Windish, D.M., & Whitman, L.W. ( 2009). Intimate partner violence. In J. R. Rosenbaum, S. Hay, & L. W. Whitman (Eds.), Yale office based medical curriculum (7th ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale RIS. Accessed June 10, 2011, from http://medicine.yale.edu/intmed/obm/index.aspx
16.
Kimberg, L.S. ( 2008). Addressing intimate partner violence with male patients: A review and introduction of pilot guidelines. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 2071-2078.
17.
Klap, R., Tang, L., Wells, K., Starks, S.L., & Rodriguez, M. ( 2007). Screening for domestic violence among adult women in the United States. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 579-584.
18.
MacMillan, H.L., Wathen, C.N., Jamieson, E., Boyle, M., McNutt, L.A., & Worster, A. ( 2006). Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 530-536.
19.
McFarlane, J., Christoffel, K., Bateman, L., Miller, V., & Bullock, L. ( 1991). Assessing for abuse: Self-report versus nurse interview . Public Health Nursing, 8, 245-250.
20.
Muelleman, R.L., & Burgess, P. ( 1998). Male victims of domestic violence and their history of perpetrating violence. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5, 866-870.
21.
Nelson, H.D., Nygren, P., McInerney, Y., & Klein, J. ( 2004). Screening women and elderly adults for family and intimate partner violence: A review of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140, 387-396.
22.
Plichta, S.B., & Falik, M. ( 2001). Prevalence of violence and its implications for women’s health. Womens Health Issues, 11, 244-258.
23.
Rabin, R.F., Jennings, J.M., Campbell, J.C., & Bair-Merritt, M.H. (2009). Intimate partner violence screening tools: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, 439-445.
24.
Rhodes, K.V., Drum, M., Anliker, E., Frankel, R.M., Howes, D.S., & Levinson, W. ( 2006). Lowering the threshold for discussions of domestic violence: A randomized controlled trial of computer screening. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1107-1114.
25.
Rhodes, K.V., Lauderdale, D.S., He, T., Howes, D.S., & Levinson, W. ( 2002). "Between me and the computer": Increased detection of intimate partner violence using a computer questionnaire. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 40, 476-484.
26.
Rodriguez, M.A., Bauer, H.M., McLoughlin, E., & Grumbach, K. ( 1999). Screening and intervention for intimate partner abuse: Practices and attitudes of primary care physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 468-474.
27.
Rodriguez, M.A., Quiroga, S.S., & Bauer, H.M. ( 1996). Breaking the silence. Battered women’s perspectives on medical care. Archives of Family Medicine, 5, 153-158.
28.
Rodriguez, M.A., Sheldon, W.R., Bauer, H.M., & Perez-Stable, E.J. (2001). The factors associated with disclosure of intimate partner abuse to clinicians. Journal of Family Practice, 50, 338-344.
29.
Sherin, K., Sinacore, J.M., Li, X., Zitter, R., & Shakil, A. ( 1998). HITS: A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Family Medicine, 30, 508-512.
30.
Short, L.M., Alpert, E., Harris, J.M., & Surprenant, Z.J. (2006). A tool for measuring physician readiness to manage intimate partner violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 173-180.
31.
Statistics Canada. (2008). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile 2008 (No. 85-224-X). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
32.
Straus, M.A. ( 1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
33.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. ( 1998). Prevalence, incidence and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ 172837) . Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .
34.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. ( 2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
35.
U.S. Census. (2000). 2000 demographic profiles. Retrieved October 27, 2009, from http://www.ctnow.com/extras/census/0600900980070.pdf
36.
Webster, J., & Holt, V. ( 2004). Screening for partner violence: Direct questioning or self-report? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103, 299-303.
