Background. Audio computer-assisted self-interviews (ACASI) are increasingly used in health research to improve the accuracy of data on sensitive behaviors. However, evidence is limited on its use among low-income populations in countries like India and for measurement of sensitive issues such as domestic violence. Method. We compared reports of domestic violence and three less sensitive behaviors related to household decision making and spousal communication in ACASI and face-to-face interviews (FTFI) among 464 young married women enrolled in a longitudinal study of gender-based power and adverse health outcomes in low-income communities in Bangalore, India. We used a test-retest design. At the 12-month study visit, we elicited responses from each participant through FTFI first, followed by ACASI. At the 24-month visit, we reversed the order, implementing ACASI first, followed by FTFI. Univariable log-linear regression models and kappa statistics were used to examine ACASI’s effects on self-reports. Results. Regression results showed significantly lower reporting in ACASI relative to FTFI at both visits, including for domestic violence (12-month risk ratio [RR] = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.73; 24-month RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62, 0.89). Response agreement between interview modes, calculated by kappa scores, was universally low, though highest for domestic violence (12-month κ = 0.45; 24-month κ = 0.48). Older age and greater educational attainment appeared associated with higher response agreement. Conclusions. Greater reporting in FTFI may be due to social desirability bias for the less sensitive questions and perceptions of therapeutic benefit for domestic violence. These results cast doubt on the appropriateness of using ACASI for measurement of sensitive behaviors in India.
Barua, A., & Kurz, K. ( 2001). Reproductive health-seeking by married adolescent girls in Maharashtra, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 9, 53-62.
2.
Bernabe-Ortiz, A., Curioso, W.H., Gonzales, M.A., Evangelista, W., Castagnetto, J.M., Carcamo, C.P., et al. (2008). Handheld computers for self-administered sensitive data collection: A comparative study in Peru. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 8, 7.
3.
Edwards, S.L., Slattery, M.L., Murtaugh, M.A., Edwards, R.L., Bryner, J., Pearson, M., et al. (2007). Development and use of touch-screen audio computer-assisted self-interviewing in a study ofAmerican Indians. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165, 1336-1342.
4.
Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., Pena, R., Agurto, S., & Winkvist, A. ( 2001). Researching domestic violence against women: Methodological and ethical considerations. Studies in Family Planning, 32(1), 1-16.
5.
George, A. ( 2002). Embodying identity through heterosexual sexuality: Newly married adolescent women in India. Culture, Health & Sexuality , 4, 207-222.
6.
Ghanem, K.G., Hutton, H.E., Zenilman, J.M., Zimba, R., & Erbelding, E.J. (2005). Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients. Sexually Transmitted Infections , 81, 421-425.
7.
Hewett, P.C., Mensch, B.S., Ribeiro, M.C.S. d. A., Jones, H.E., Lippman, S.A., Montgomery, M.R., et al. (2008). Using sexually transmitted infection biomarkers to validate reporting of sexual behavior within a randomized, experimental evaluation of interviewing methods. American Journal of Epidemiology , 168, 202-211.
8.
Jaspan, H.B., Flisher, A.J., Myer, L., Mathews, C., Seebregts, C., Berwick, J.R., et al. (2007). Brief report: Methods for collecting sexual behaviour information from South African adolescents-A comparison of paper versus personal digital assistant questionnaires. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 353-359.
9.
Jaya, Hindin, M. J., & Ahmed, S. ( 2008). Differences in young people’s reports of sexual behaviors according to interview methodology: A randomized trial in India . American Journal of Public Health, 98, 169-174.
10.
Jejeebhoy, S.J. ( 1998). Adolescent sexual and reproductive behavior: A review of the evidence from India. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1275-1290.
11.
Jennings, T.E., Lucenko, B.A., Malow, R.M., & Devieux, J.G. ( 2002). Audio-CASI vs. interview method of administration of an HIV/STD risk of exposure screening instrument for teenagers. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 13, 781-784.
12.
Johnson, A.M., Copas, A.J., Erens, B., Mandalia, S., Fenton, K., Korovessis, C., et al. (2001). Effect of computer-assisted self-interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: A methodological experiment. AIDS, 15(1), 111.
13.
Kim, J., Dubowitz, H., Hudson-Martin, E., & Lane, W. ( 2008). Comparison of 3 data collection methods for gathering sensitive and less sensitive information. Ambulatory Pediatrics , 8, 255-260.
14.
Kissinger, P., Rice, J., Farley, T., Trim, S., Jewitt, K., Margavio, V., et al. (1999). Application of computer-assisted interviews to sexual behavior research. American Journal of Epidemiology , 149, 950.
15.
Koziol-McLain, J., Giddings, L., Rameka, M., & Fyfe, E. ( 2008). Intimate partner violence screening and brief intervention: Experiences of women in two New Zealand health care settings. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 53, 504-510.
16.
Krishnan, S., Iyengar, S., Pande, R.P., Subbiah, K., Roca, E., Anuradha, R., et al. (2005). Marriage and motherhood: Influences on women’s power in sexual relationships. Paper presented at the Population Association of America, 2005 Annual Meeting. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://paa2005.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=50605
17.
Krishnan, S., Rocca, C., Hubbard, A., Subbiah, K., Edmeades, J., & Padian, N. ( 2009). Do changes in spousal employment status lead to domestic violence? Insights from a prospective study in Bangalore, India. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 136-143.
18.
Kurth, A.E., Martin, D.P., Golden, M.R., Weiss, N.S., Heagerty, P.J., Spielberg, F., et al. (2004). A comparison between audio computer-assisted self-interviews and clinician interviews for obtaining the sexual history . Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 31, 719.
19.
Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. ( 1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
20.
Le, L.C., Blum, R.W., Magnani, R., Hewett, P.C., & Do, H.M. ( 2006). A pilot of audio computer-assisted self-interview for youth reproductive health research in Vietnam. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 740-747.
21.
MacMillan, H.L., Wathen, C.N., Jamieson, E., Boyle, M., McNutt, L.A., Worster, A., et al. (2006). Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: A randomized trial. JAMA , 296, 530.
22.
Mensch, B.S., Hewett, P.C., & Erulkar, A.S. ( 2003). The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: A methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography, 40, 247-268.
23.
Mensch, B.S., Hewett, P.C., Gregory, R., & Helleringer, S. (2008). Sexual behavior and STI/HIV status among adolescents in rural Malawi: An evaluation of the effect of interview mode on reporting. Studies in Family Planning, 39, 321-334.
24.
Metzger, D.S., Koblin, B., Turner, C., Navaline, H., Valenti, F., Holte, S., et al. (2000). Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152(2), 99-106.
25.
Mitchell, K., Wellings, K., Elam, G., Erens, B., Fenton, K., & Johnson, A. ( 2007). How can we facilitate reliable reporting in surveys of sexual behaviour? Evidence from qualitative research. Culture Health & Sexuality, 9, 519-531.
26.
Newman, J.C., Jarlais, D., Turner, C.F., Gribble, J., Cooley, P., & Paone, D. ( 2002). The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 294-297.
27.
NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group. (2007). The feasibility of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing in international settings. AIDS, 21(Suppl.2), S49-S58.
28.
NIMH Multisite HIV/STD Prevention Group.2008). Designing an audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) system in a multisite trial: A brief report. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 49, S52.
29.
Palen, L., Smith, E.A., Caldwell, L.L., Flisher, A.J., Wegener, L., & Vergnani, T. ( 2008). Inconsistent reports of sexual intercourse among South African high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health , 42, 221-227.
30.
Potdar, R., & Koenig, M.A. ( 2005). Does audio-CASI improve reports of risky behavior? Evidence from a randomized field trial among young urban men in India. Studies in Family Planning, 36(2), 107-116.
31.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. ( 1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Renker, P.R., & Tonkin, P. ( 2007). Postpartum women’s evaluations of an audio/ video computer-assisted perinatal violence screen. CIN-Computers Informatics Nursing, 25(3), 139-147.
33.
Rhodes, K.V., Drum, M., Anliker, E., Frankel, R.M., Howes, D.S., & Levinson, W. ( 2006). Lowering the threshold for discussions of domestic violence: A randomized controlled trial of computer screening. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1107-1114.
34.
Rhodes, K.V., Lauderdale, D.S., He, T., Howes, D.S., & Levinson, W. ( 2002). "Between me and the computer": Increased detection of intimate partner violence using a computer questionnaire. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 40, 476-484.
35.
Rocca, C.H., Rathod, S., Falle, T., Pande, R.P., & Krishnan, S. ( 2008). Challenging assumptions about women’s empowerment: Social and economic resources and domestic violence among young married women in urban South India. International Journal of Epidemiology , 38, 577-585.
36.
Santhya, K.G., Haberland, N., Ram, F., Sinha, R.K., & Mohanty, S.K. ( 2007). Consent and coercion: Examining unwanted sex among married young women in India. International Family Planning Perspectives , 33(3), 124-132.
37.
Schroder, K.E.E., Carey, M.P., & Vanable, P.A. ( 2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(2), 104-123.
38.
Simoes, A.A., Bastos, F.I., Moreira, R.I., Lynch, K.G., & Metzger, D.S. ( 2006). A randomized trial of audio computer and in-person interview to assess HIV risk among drug and alcohol users in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil . Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 237-243.
39.
Spangaro, J., Zwi, A., & Poulos, R. ( 2009). The elusive search for definitive evidence on routine screening for intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(1), 55.
40.
Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T.W. ( 1996). Asking sensitive questions-The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275-304.
41.
Turner, C.F., Ku, L., Rogers, S.M., Lindberg, L.D., Pleck, J.H., & Sonenstein, F.L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology . Science, 280, 867-873.
42.
van de Wijgert, J., Padian, N., Shiboski, S., & Turner, C. ( 2000). Is audio computer-assisted self-interviewing a feasible method of surveying in Zimbabwe?International Journal of Epidemiology, 29, 885-890.
43.
van Griensven, F., Naorat, S., Kilmarx, P.H., Jeeyapant, S., Manopaiboon, C., Chaikummao, S., et al. (2006). Palmtop-assisted self-interviewing for the collection of sensitive behavioral data: Randomized trial with drug use urine testing. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 271-278.
44.
Williams, M.L., Freeman, R.C., Bowen, A.M., Zhao, Z., Elwood, W.N., Gordon, C., et al. (2000). A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 199-213.
