This study examined associations between unwanted sexual experiences and both physical disability and cognitive performance in a nationally representative sample of young adults. We used data from 11,878 participants (ages 26-32) in Waves I, III, and IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Logistic regressions determined associations between physical disability and level of cognitive performance (using a modified Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test) and the odds of experiencing physically forced and nonphysically coerced sex. Approximately 24% of females and 4% of males reported unwanted sexual experiences. Compared to respondents without disabilities, females with a physical disability had greater odds of experiencing forced sex (OR = 1.49; 95% CI [1.06, 2.08]), whereas males with a physical disability had greater odds of coerced sex (OR = 1.90; 95% CI [1.02, 3.52]). Compared to those with average cognitive performance scores, females with scores above 110 had slightly higher odds of coerced sex (OR = 1.20; 95% CI [1.03-1.41]). Further research on pathways underlying these associations is needed to inform prevention efforts.
AkersA. Y.LynchC. P.GoldM. A.ChangJ. C.DoswellW.WiesenfeldH. C.. . . BostJ. (2009). Exploring the relationship among weight, race, and sexual behaviors among girls. Pediatrics, 124, e913-e920.
2.
BarnesJ. E.NollJ. G.PutnamF. W.TrickettP. K. (2009). Sexual and physical revictimization among victims of severe childhood sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 412-420.
3.
BeailN.WardenS. (1995). Sexual abuse of adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39, 382-387.
4.
BreitenbecherK. H. (2000). Sexual assault on college campuses: Is an ounce of prevention enough?Applied & Preventive Psychology, 9, 23-52.
5.
BrownlieE. B.JabbarA.BeitchmanJ.VidaR.AtkinsonL. (2007). Language impairment and sexual assault of girls and women: Findings from a community sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 618-626.
6.
BrownridgeD. A. (2006). Partner violence against women with disabilities: Prevalence, risk, and explanations. Violence Against Women, 12, 805-822.
7.
CasteelC.MartinS. L.SmithJ. B.GurkaK. K.KupperL. L. (2008). National study of physical and sexual assault among women with disabilities. Injury Prevention, 14, 87-90.
8.
ChengM. M.UdryJ. R. (2002). Sexual behaviors of physically disabled adolescents in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 48-58.
9.
ChengM. M.UdryJ. R. (2005). Sexual experiences of adolescents with low cognitive abilities in the US. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 17, 155-172.
10.
CohenM. M.ForteT.Du MontJ.HymanI.RomansS. (2005). Intimate partner violence among Canadian women with activity limitations. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 834-839.
11.
CokerA. L.SmithP. H.FaddenM. K. (2005). Intimate partner violence and disabilities among women attending family practice clinics. Journal of Women’s Health, 14, 829-838.
12.
CurryM. A.Hassouneh-PhillipsD.Johnston-SilverbergA. (2001). Abuse of women with disabilities—An ecological model and review. Violence Against Women, 7, 60-79.
13.
DunnL. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised: Manual for Forms L and M. Circle Pines, NM: American Guidance Service.
14.
ElliottD. M.MokD. S.BriereJ. (2004). Adult sexual assault: Prevalence, symptomatology, and sex differences in the general population. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 203-211.
15.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (Vol. NCJ 182369). Washingon, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, and National Institute of Justice.
16.
HarrisK. M.HalpernC. T.EntzelP.TaborJ.BearmanP. S.UdryJ. R. (2008). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research design. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design
17.
HathawayJ. E.MucciL. A.SilvermanJ. G.BrooksD. R.MathewsR.PavlosC. A. (2000). Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 302-307.
18.
Horner-JohnsonW.DrumC. E. (2006). Prevalence of maltreatment of people with intellectual disabilities: A review of recently published research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 12, 57-69.
19.
KhemkaI.HicksonL.CasellaM.AccetturiN.RooneyM. E. (2009). Impact of coercive tactics on the decision-making of adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 353-362.
20.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape—Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher-education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
21.
LyndonA. E.WhiteJ. W.KadlecK. M. (2007). Manipulation and force as sexual coercion tactics: Conceptual and empirical differences. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 291-303.
22.
MartinS. L.RayN.Sotres-AlvarezD.KupperL. L.MoraccoK. E.DickensP. A.. . . GizliceZ. (2006). Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities. Violence Against Women, 12, 823-837.
23.
McCabeM. P.CumminsR. A.ReidB. A. (1994). An empirical study of the sexual abuse of people with intellectual disability. Sexuality and Disability, 12, 297-306.
24.
McCauleyJ.RuggieroK. J.ResnickH. S.ConoscentiL. M.KilpatrickD. G. (2009). Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape in relation to substance use problems: results from a national sample of college women. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 458-462.
25.
McFarlaneJ.HughesR. B.NosekM. A.GroffJ. Y.SwedlendN.Dolan MullenP. (2001). Abuse assessment screen-disability (AAS-D): Measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 10, 861-866.
26.
MilbergerS.IsraelN.LeRoyB.MartinA.PotterL.Patchak-SchusterP. (2003). Violence against women with physical disabilities. Violence and Victims, 18, 581-591.
27.
MurphyG. H.O’CallaghanA. (2004). Capacity of adults with intellectual disabilities to consent to sexual relationships. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1347-1357.
28.
NosekM. A.FoleyC. C.HughesR. B.HowlandC. A. (2001). Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 19, 177-189.
29.
NosekM. A.HughesR. B.TaylorH. B.TaylorP. (2006). Disability, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics of abused women with physical disabilities. Violence Against Women, 12, 838-850.
30.
PlichtaS. B.FalikM. (2001). Prevalence of violence and its implications for women’s health. Women’s Health Issues, 11, 244-258.
31.
PowersL. E.CurryM. A.OschwaldM.MaleyS. (2002). Barriers and strategies in addressing abuse: A survey of disabled women’s experiences. Journal of Rehabilitation, 68, 4-13.
32.
SmithD. L. (2008). Disability, gender and intimate partner violence: Relationships from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sexuality and Disability, 26, 15-28.
33.
SobseyD.DoeT. (1991). Patterns of sexual abuse and assault. Sexuality and Disability, 9, 243-259.
34.
StermacL.Del BoveG.AddisonM. (2004). Stranger and acquaintance sexual assault of adult males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 901-915.
35.
SullivanP. M.KnutsonJ. F. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1257-1273.
36.
TestaM.DermanK. H. (1999). The differential correlates of sexual coercion and rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 548-561.
37.
World Health Organization. (2009). Promoting sexual and reproductive health for persons with disabilities: WHO/UNFPA guidance note. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
38.
YoungM. E.NosekM. A.HowlandC.ChanpongG.RintalaD. H. (1997). Prevalence of abuse of women with physical disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabiliation, 78(12 Suppl 5), S34-S38.
