While Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs have improved the treatment of rape victims by offering more compassionate and thorough treatment, SANEs believe victims continue to face revictimization by the medical, criminal justice and legal systems. The purpose of this research is to explore SANEs’ perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police, legal system and medical system. Data from interviews with 39 Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners from four East Coast states reveal that most SANEs believe that the medical, criminal justice, and legal systems wield the power to revictimize rape victims. SANEs were more likely to cite the criminal justice system as a source of revictimization, followed by the medical system and legal system. According to SANEs, police contribute to victims’ distress through failure to ask questions in a sensitive manner, failure to proceed with investigations, and by asking victim-blaming questions. Revictimization by the legal system results when charges are never filed, cases are postponed or dropped, plea bargains are unsatisfactory, and victims’ character and credibility are questioned. Revictimization by the medical system is marked by long waits for medical attention.
AhmannE. (2002). Developing cultural competence in health care settings. Pediatric Nursing, 28(2), 133-137.
2.
AmeyA. L.BishaiD. (2002). Measuring the quality of medical care for women who experience sexual assault with data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39, 631-638.
3.
Antognoli-TolandP. (1985). Comprehensive program for examination of sexual assault victims by nurses: A hospital-based project in Texas. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 11(3), 132-136.
4.
ArchambaultJ.LindsayS. (2001). Responding to non-stranger sexual assault. In ReulandM.BritoC.S.CarrollL. (Eds.), Solving Crime and Disorder Problems: Current Issues, Police Strategies, and Organizational Tactics (pp. 21-42). Washington, DC: linPolice Executive Research Forum.
5.
BechtelK.RyanE.GallagherD. (2008). Impact of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners on the evaluation of sexual assault in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 24, 442-447.
6.
BouffardJ. (2000). Predicting type of sexual assault case closure from victim, suspect and case characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 527-542.
7.
BrownK. (2010). Forensic nursing in the emergency department. In RivielloR. (Ed.), Manual of Forensic Emergency Medicine: A Guide for Clinicians (pp. 4-9). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
8.
CampbellR. (2008, November). The psychological impact of rape victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Psychologist, 63, 813-828.
9.
CampbellR. (2006). Rape survivors’ experiences with the legal and medical systems: Do rape victim advocates make a difference?Violence Against Women, 12, 30-45.
10.
CampbellR. (2005). What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence & Victims, 20, 55-68.
11.
CampbellR. (2004, November). The effectiveness of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet, a National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Retrieved from http://www.vawnet.org
12.
CampbellR. (1998). The community response to rape: Victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 355-379.
13.
CampbellR.PattersonD.BybeeD.DworkinE. R. (2009). Predicting sexual assault prosecution outcomes: The role of medical forensic evidence collected by Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 712-727.
14.
CampbellR.PattersonD.AdamsA. E.DiegelR.CoatsS. (2008). A participatory evaluation project to measure SANE nursing practice and adult sexual assault patients’ psychological well-being. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 4, 19-28.
15.
CampbellR.TownsendS. M.LongS. M.KinnisonK. E.PulleyE. M.AdamesS. B.WascoS. M. (2006). Responding to sexual assault victims’ medical and emotional needs: A national study of the services provided by SANE programs. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 384-398.
16.
CampbellR.RajaS. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences in military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97-106.
17.
CampbellR.TownsendS. M.LongS. M.KinnisonK. E.PulleyE. M.AdamesS. B.WascoS. M. (2005). Organizational characteristics of sexual assault nurse examiner programs: Results from the national survey of SANE programs. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 1, 57-64.
18.
CampbellR.BybeeD. (1997). Emergency medical services for sexual assault victims: Detecting the cracks in service delivery. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 3, 75-101.
19.
CampbellR.PattersonD.LichtyL. F. (2005). The effectiveness of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 313-329.
20.
CampbellR.WascoS. M.AhrensC. E.SeflT.BarnesH. E. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239-1259.
21.
CampbellR.SeflT.BarnesH. E.AhrensC. E.WascoS. M.Zaragoza-DiesfeldY. (1999). Community services for rape survivors: Enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 847-858.
22.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). Current estimates of the number of people age 12+ seeking care at the ED following a sexual assault(Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System). Available from www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/
23.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). 20 leading causes of nonfatal violence-related injury, United States. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://webappa.cdc.gov/cgi-bin/broker.exe
24.
CianconeA.WilsonC.ColletteR.GersonL. W. (2000). Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs in the United States. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 35, 353-357.
25.
CrandallC.HelitzerD. (2003). Impact evaluation of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) program (NCJ 203276). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
26.
DiNittoD.MartinP. Y.NortonD.MaxwellM. (1986). After sexual assault: Who should examine sexual assault survivors?American Journal of Nursing, 86, 538-540.
27.
DuMontJ.WhiteD.McGregorM. J. (2009). Investigating the medical forensic examination from the perspectives of sexually assaulted women. Social Sciences & Medicine, 68, 774-780.
28.
DuMontJ.ParnisD. (2003). Forensic nursing in the context of sexual assault: Comparing the opinions and practices of nurse examiners and nurses. Applied Nursing Research, 16, 173-183.
29.
EdwardK.MacleodM. (1999). The reality and myth of rape: Implications for the criminal justice system. Expert Evidence, 7, 37-58.
EricksenJ.DudleyC.McIntoshG.RitchL.ShumayS.SimpsonM. (2002). Clients’ experiences with a specialized sexual assault service. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 28, 86-90.
32.
EstrichS. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
FlavinJ. (2001). Feminism for the mainstream criminologist: An invitation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 271-285.
34.
FrazierP. A.HaneyB. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607-628.
35.
FrohmannL. (1999). Sexual assault. In RubingtonE.WeinbergM. (Eds.), Deviance: The interactionist perspective (7/e) (pp.174 -186). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
36.
GirardinB. W. (2005). The Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner: A win-win solution. Topics in Emergency Medicine, 27(2), 124-131.
37.
GregoryJ.LeesS. (1994). In search of gender justice: Sexual assault and the criminal justice system. Feminist Review, 48, 80-93.
38.
HalliganS. L.MichaelT.ClarkD. M.EhlersA. (2003). Posttraumatic stress disorder following assault: The role of cognitive processing, trauma memory, and appraisals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 419-431.
KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S.RuggieroK.ConoscentiL. M.McCauleyJ. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rapes: A national study (NIJ 219181). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
41.
KonradiA. (2007). Taking the stand: Rape survivors and the prosecution of rapists. Westport, CT: Praeger.
42.
KonradiA.BurgerT. (2000). Having the last word: An examination of rape survivors’ participation in sentencing. Violence Against Women, 6, 351-395.
LafreeG. (1989). Rape and Criminal Justice: The social construction of sexual assault. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
45.
LarcombeW. (2002). The “ideal” victim v. successful rape complainants: Not what you might expect. Feminist Legal Studies, 10, 131-148.
46.
LedrayL. (1999). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) development & operation guide. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice.
47.
LedrayL. (2010). Expanding evidence collection time: Is it time to move beyond the 72-hour rule? How do we decide?Journal of Forensic Nursing, 6, 47-50.
48.
LedrayL.BarryL. (1998). SANE expert and factual testimony. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 24, 284-287.
49.
LedrayL.SimmelinkK. (1997). Efficacy of SANE evidence collection: A Minnesota study. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 23, 75-77.
50.
LittelK. (2001). Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANE) programs: Improving the community response to sexual assault victims. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime.
51.
LoganT. K.ColeJ.CapilloA. (2007). Differential characteristics of intimate partner, acquaintance, and stranger rape survivors examined by a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1066-1076.
52.
MadiganL.GambleN. (1991). The second rape: Society’s continued betrayal of the victim. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
53.
MagidD. J.HouryD.KoepsellT. D.ZillerA.SoulesM. R.JennyC. (2004). The epidemiology of female rape victims who seek immediate medical care: Temporal trends in the incidence of sexual assault and acquaintance rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(1), 3-12.
54.
MaierS. L. (2008). “I have heard horrible stories…” Rape victim advocates’ perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence Against Women, 14, 7, 786-808.
55.
MartinP. Y. (2005). Rape work. New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
MartinP. Y.DiNittoD. (1987). The sexual assault exam: Beyond the hospital emergency room. Women’s Health, 12, 5-28.
57.
MartinP. Y.PowellM. (1994). Accounting for the “second assault”: Legal organizations’ framing of rape victims. Law & Social Inquiry, 19(3/4), 853-890.
58.
MatoesianG. M. (1993). Reproducing rape domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
McGregorM. J.DuMontJ.MyhrT. L. (2002). Sexual assault forensic medical examination: Is evidence related to successful prosecution?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39, 639-647.
60.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis, 2/e. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
MonroeL. M.KinneyL. M.DafeamekporD. S.DantzlerJ.ReynoldsM. W. (2005). The experience of sexual assault: Findings from a statewide needs assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 767-776.
62.
Nugent-BorakoveM. E.FanflikP.TroutmanD.JohnsonN.BurgessA.O’ConnorA. L. (2006). Testing the efficacy of SANE/SART programs: Do They Make a Difference in Sexual Assault Arrest & Prosecution Outcomes?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/214252.pdf
63.
O’BrienC. (1996). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program coordinator. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 22, 532-533.
64.
ParnisD.DuMontJ.GombayB. (2005). Cooperation or co-optation? Assessing the methodological benefits and barriers involved in conducting qualitative research through medical institutional settings. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 686-697.
65.
PattersonD. (2011). The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(2), 328-347.
66.
PattersonD.GreesonM.CampbellR. (2009). Understanding rape survivors’ decisions not to seek help from formal social systems. Health & Social Work, 34, 127-136.
67.
PenningtonE. C.ZwemerF. L.KrebsD. (2010). Unique sexual assault examiner program utilizing mid-level providers. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(1), 95-98.
68.
PlichtaS. B.ClementsP. T.HousemanC. (2007). Why SANEs matter: Models of care for sexual violence victims in the emergency department. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 3(1), 15-23.
69.
RoviS.ShimoniN. (2002). Prophylaxis provided to sexual assault victims seen at U.S. emergency departments. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 57, 204-207.
70.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
SpeckP.AikenM. (1995). 20 years of community nursing service. Tennessee Nurse, 5-18.
SieversV.MurphyS.MillerJ. J. (2003). Sexual assault evidence collection more accurate when completed by Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners: Colorado’s experience. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 29, 511-514.
74.
StarzynskiL. L.UllmanS. E.FilipasH. H.TownsendS. M. (2005). Correlates of women’s sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 4, 417-432.
75.
StermacL.DunlapH.BainbridgeD. (2005). Sexual assault services delivered by SANEs. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 1(3), 124-128.
76.
StermacL. E.StirpeT. S. (2002). Efficacy of a 2-year-old Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner program in a Canadian hospital. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 28, 18-23.
77.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
78.
TaslitzA. (1999). Rape and the culture of the courtroom. New York, NY: New York University Press.
79.
TaylorW. K. (2002). Collecting evidence for sexual assault: The role of the sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 78(Suppl. 1), S91-S94.
80.
TemkinJ. (1996). Doctors, rape, and criminal justice. Howard Journal, 35, 1-20.
81.
UllmanS. E. (1996). Do social reactions to sexual assault victims vary by support providers?Violence and Victims, 11, 143-157.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime. (2004b). A national protocol for sexual assault medical forensic examinations: Adults/adolescents (NCJ206554). Washington, DC: Office on Violence Against Women.
84.
WoodellA. T.BowlingJ. M.MoraccoK. E.ReedM. L. (2007). Emergency contraception for sexual assault victims in North Carolina emergency departments. North Carolina Medical Journal, 68, 399-403.
