Abstract
Child abuse has been present in Mexico but there have been few studies that analyze its effects in adults. There are no Mexican validated scales that measure the relationship between abuse experienced in childhood and its effects into adulthood. The purpose of this study is to develop a past child abuse and neglect scale to measure these phenomena in adults and also to analyze the relationship the effects have with other psychological variables (e.g., anxiety, depression, self-esteem, partner-violence, personality, and fatalism). There were 763 participants from Juarez City, located on the northern border of Mexico. All participants were above the age of 18 years. The scale was developed, and its psychometric properties were analyzed. A first analysis consisted of analyzing the factor structure of the scale items with an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and then a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to corroborate the factor structure. The resulting factors were guilt, relationship with parents, strong physical abuse, sexual abuse, mild physical and verbal abuse, and basic care. The internal reliabilities for all factors in both analyses were between Cronbach’s alpha values of .77 and .92. Correlations of these factors with psychological variables were analyzed, and several statistically significant correlations were found. The scale has a good factor structure that correctly reflects the indicators of child abuse and neglect with good internal reliability values. The analysis showed that the prevalence rates of child abuse and neglect in Juarez were higher than those reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) in other locations worldwide. Actions by governments, universities, and civil associations should take place to reduce these rates, especially because of their long-term physical, emotional, and psychological consequences.
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale that measures experiences and effects of past child abuse and neglect in an adult population on the northern border of Mexico—an area that has experienced an increase in social violence since 2008. The study also analyzed the prevalence of past child abuse and neglect (CAN) in adults from Northern Mexico.
Measuring past CAN in adults is important because it has been shown that adults who report having experienced abuse and neglect in childhood tend to have a greater risk for drug abuse, alcohol abuse, depression, suicide attempts, obesity, high risky sexual behaviors, and unintended pregnancies, as well as physical problems such as an increased probability of developing cancer, heart disease, chronic lung disease, and even death (e.g., Archer et al., 2017; Díaz-Olavarrieta et al., 2001; Felitti et al., 1998; Norman et al., 2012; World Health Organization, 2017), and these risks increased with experiences of multiple types of maltreatment (Archer et al., 2017).
Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics
The World Health Organization (WHO, 2017) reports that one in four adults was physically abused as children. According to this report (WHO, 2017), individuals between the ages of 18 and 24, when asked if they had experienced abuse and neglect before they were 18, reported the following: 23% reported physical abuse, 36% reported emotional abuse, 16% reported physical neglect, and 18% of girls and 8% of boys reported sexual abuse. In a study with a Mexican sample of 1,150 adults, 10.7% reported physical abuse during childhood, and 5% reported sexual abuse (Díaz-Olavarrieta et al., 2001). Rates in Mexico were lower than the rates in the rest of the world.
CAN are an enormous problem in Mexico. A recent study from the Senate of the Mexican Republic (2019) reported that among the 33 nations that are part of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Mexico ranks highest in physical violence, sexual abuse, and homicides committed against children 14 years or younger. According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF, 2019a), there are 39.2 million children and adolescents ages 17 years or younger in Mexico; and 63%, between the ages of 1 and 14, who have reportedly suffered some type of violence. In the same group, six out of 10 children suffered from violent disciplinary methods at home (UNICEF, 2019a). The methods used to discipline children include psychological aggression, and physical punishments like beatings or being hit with objects (UNICEF, 2019b). In children and adolescents between the ages of 10 and 17, eight out of 10 incidents of aggression occurred either at school, on the streets, or at home (UNICEF, 2019a). In terms of homicide rates involving children in Mexico, 10,547 deaths were reported between 2010 and 2017 (UNICEF, 2019a). In children ages 5 years or under, 5.1% did not receive adequate care because they either stayed home by themselves or were under the care of other children who were age 10 or younger (UNICEF, 2019b). CAN in Mexico needs to be addressed by health professionals by not only identifying those adults who are still affected by it, but also by actions focused on prevention—detecting and identifying children at risk, and providing them the necessary care to be safe.
Child Abuse and Neglect
The framework to be used for the construction of the CAN scale will be the one proposed by the American Psychological Association (APA, n.d.), which uses the Child Abuse and Prevention Treatment Act to define CAN as, Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation, or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk of serious harm.
Child abuse is divided into four categories that include physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, and neglect (Ajilian et al., 2014; WHO, 2002). Physical abuse occurs when there is an intentional use of physical force against children, such as hitting or kicking (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2019). Sexual abuse occurs when children are forced or pressured to engage in sexual acts (contact), such as fondling or penetration, or other non-contact sexual activities, such as exhibitionism or sexual invitations (Anderson et al., 1993; CDC, 2019). Both contact and non-contact sexual abuse have been shown to be related to mental health problems (e.g., reporting lower levels of health-related quality of life; Landolt et al., 2016). Emotional abuse occurs when children’s emotional well-being or self-worth are harmed by behaviors such as shaming or rejection (CDC, 2019). Neglect happens when children’s basic physical and emotional needs are not met, such as not having adequate food to eat or not having appropriate clothing (CDC, 2019).
Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect
The CDC and Kaiser Permanente conducted the Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) study with two waves of data collection (1995 and 1997) to analyze how childhood abuse and neglect related to health and well-being later in life (Felitti et al., 1998). Anda and Brown (2010) summarize the main findings of the ACE studies mentioning that CAN increase the risk of developing cardiovascular disease, cancer, and asthma; they also increase the likelihood of smoking, heavy drinking, binge drinking, obesity, marijuana use, and high perceived risk of HIV. CAN were also found to be related to sleep disturbances, frequent mental distress, anxiety, hopelessness, disruptions in work or activity due to mental health, and treatment for mental health conditions. They were also found, among other things, to result in poor health, life dissatisfaction, poor health-related quality of life, separation or divorce, and physical disability.
Measure in a City Affected by Social Violence, Juarez
Juarez, a Mexican city located on the northern border next to the United States, has been affected greatly by social violence due to a war among drug cartels. The city of Juarez is one of the places that drug cartels use to transport drugs into the United States, thus, there is a strategic importance in having control of the city. In 2008, violence in Juarez increased dramatically, making it the most violent city in the world from 2008 to 2010 because of the high rate of homicides (Quinones, 2016). After 2010, the homicide rates started to decline, but a great deal of social violence remains due to the drug cartels’ activities. Some studies have analyzed the effect that social violence has had on the mental health of the people of Juarez (e.g., Quiñones et al., 2013), but there are no studies that analyze the relationship between past CAN and mental health in adults.
Developing a Child Abuse and Neglect Scale for Adults to Measure Its Prevalence
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a CAN scale in a Mexican population, specifically among those who reside along its northern border. A CAN scale will help to evaluate the problem and to analyze its relationship with other types of violence and psychological constructs.
Method
Participants
Participants were recruited from Juarez City, located on the northern border of Mexico. There were two different convenience samples, one of them was used for the EFA, and the second sample was used for the CFA and correlations with other constructs (see Table 1). The first sample consisted of 300 participants recruited from the Autonomous University of Juarez City. It was a convenience sample, where participants were approached at different locations on the campus and were invited to voluntarily participate in the study. Participants were 83.3% females and 16.7% males, with a mean age of 21.40 (SD = 5.13) years. Regarding marital status, 79.9% were single and 18.0% were married or living with a romantic partner.
Demographic Information by Sample.
Note. EFA = Exploratory Factor Analysis; CFA = Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
For the second convenience sample, participants were approached in different neighborhoods of the city, and were invited to participate voluntarily in the study. The neighborhoods were selected from different parts of the city but were not chosen randomly. The sample was chosen to be diverse and without any exclusion criteria except for participants being 18 years or older. There were 463 participants in the second sample with a mean age of 29.73 (SD = 12.36) years, with 53.8% females and 46.2% males. Their reported marital status was 61.5% married or living with a romantic partner and 37.6% single. The educational level of participants was reported as 8% elementary or less, 20.0% middle school, 36.3% high school, 32.1% bachelor’s degree, and 3.6% master’s degree.
Materials
Participants were asked about their sociodemographic information: age, gender, marital status, and educational level.
The Child Abuse and Neglect Scale (CANeS) was developed for this study. The scale was initially composed of 52 items using a 5-point Likert-type scale (Not true, rarely true, sometimes true, often true, and very often true). Participants were asked to answer according to what they had experienced as children. The factors of the scale are guilt, relationship with parents, strong physical abuse, sexual abuse, mild physical and verbal abuse, and basic care. The sexual abuse factor includes items from contact (e.g., someone touched me sexually) and non-contact (e.g., someone made me see their genitals) sexual abuse as both have been shown to be related to poorer mental health (Landolt et al., 2016). Cronbach’s alpha values range from .77 to .92.
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Spitzer et al., 1994) measures depression with nine items based in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994). The scale has a 4-point Likert-type response format that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Internal reliability for the scale is good with α = .81.
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) is a 10-item scale with a 6-point Likert-type response (totally disagree to totally agree). The Cronbach’s alpha value for its internal reliability is .79.
The Violence Scale (Valdez-Santiago et al., 2006) measures partner-violence, and it is composed of 26 items with four response options (never to many times). The scale is composed of four factors: psychological, sexual, mild physical, and strong physical. The internal reliability for the total scale is α = .99.
The Multidimensional Fatalism Scale (MFS; Esparza et al., 2015) is composed of 30 items with a Likert-type response format of five options (strongly disagree to strongly agree). The scale has five factors: fatalism, pessimism, internality, luck, and divine control. The internal reliability Cronbach’s alpha values for the factors range from .76 to .82.
The Adult’s Manifest Anxiety Scale (Reynolds et al., 2003) is a 36-item scale with “yes” and “no” response options. The scale is composed of three anxiety-related factors: restlessness, physiological anxiety, and social worries and stress. The internal reliabilities of the factors have Cronbach’s alpha values that range from .71 to .91.
The Overall Personality Assessment Scale (OPERAS; Vigil-Colet et al., 2013) measures personality, and it is based on the Big-Five model of personality. It consists of 40 items with a 5-point Likert-type response format ranging from totally disagree to totally agree. The scale has five factors: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, openness to experience, and autonomy. This scale has good psychometric properties.
Procedure
The development of the scale was based on Muñiz and Fonseca-Pedrero’s (2019) guidelines to developing a scale. The first step was to explain, in a general framework, the reason for the development of this scale, as explained earlier. The second step was to define the measured variable and base the items on the chosen definition. For the third step, specifications, the characteristics of the items and scale, such as type, number, length, content, and distribution of the items, were determined. Items were written in the fourth step based on the chosen theory and revised by experts in the field. The editing of the scale was the fifth step where the appearance of the scale, including the grammar, orthography, and presentation, were revised for the scale to look professional to participants. In the sixth step, the pilot study, the scale was administered to participants, and the content of the items was qualitatively evaluated to assess any difficulty in comprehending the words or phrases used. For the seventh step, additional measures were selected to evaluate concurrent validity to measure how this scale associates with other related constructs. The measures used were the variables with a previously demonstrated relationship to CAN, including anxiety, depression, self-esteem, partner-violence, personality, and fatalism, as described earlier. In the eighth step, test application, the sample was defined according to the characteristics of the target population. In this study, the first sample, used for the EFA, was a convenience sample of university students. In the second sample, used in the CFA, a convenience sample from the general population was chosen to participate. The ninth step consisted of analyzing the psychometric properties of the scale. In our study, we analyzed the factor structure of the scale with an EFA within the first sample. Once the factor structure was defined, it was cross-validated with a different sample from the general population. Internal reliability indices were calculated in both samples. The CANeS was correlated with other variables to assess its concurrent validity and relationship with other constructs in the nomological net (Cronbach & Meehl, 1955). For the 10th step, the final version of the scale was used to measure the prevalence of CAN in both samples of the study. This study was submitted and approved by the ethics committee of the institution before its execution.
Results
Definition of the Measured Variable
CAN were previously defined and include the following dimensions: physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, and neglect (APA, n.d.). The content of the items was planned to reflect these four dimensions.
Specifications
The scale was planned as a paper and pencil test because there is not enough infrastructure in Mexico to administer the scale with electronic devices. Also, the scale plan was to have few items per dimension (five), so that it could be applied concurrently with other measures and avoid participant fatigue. Items were redacted with simple and common language so that most people could understand the scale correctly. Finally, the scale was designed to have a 5-point Likert-type response, from not at all true to very often true.
Writing the Items
Based on the definition and model of CAN used in this study, items were written for each of the factors by three researchers, each of whom worked independently. Each researcher also had experience in violence research, one at the doctoral level and two as doctoral students. Although the objective for this part of the study was to develop a brief CAN scale, the goal was to write more than five items per factor to select the best five items after the EFA. In total, 52 items were used for the first analyses of the long scale.
Editing of the Scale
The first long scale, with the 52 items, was redacted with instructions, items, and response options in a professional format. The items were proofread and double-checked to detect any grammatical or orthographical errors.
Pilot Study
The edited scale was given to a focus group of five students, ages 19 to 28 years, two men and three women, to evaluate the items of the scale qualitatively. They were asked if they understood the instructions, response options and items, and to mention any problems they saw with the scale. All participants understood the items, instructions, and response options, and they had no suggested changes.
Test Application
The target population were adult residents of Juarez, 18 or more years of age. For the EFA, university students were recruited as a convenience sample. According to MacCallum et al. (1999), the power analyses to calculate the sample size of a factor analysis should be dependent on communalities, the number of factors, and the number of items per factor. MacCallum et al. (1999) indicate that “if results show a relatively small number of factors and moderate to high communalities, then the investigator can be confident that the obtained factors represent a close match to population factors, even with moderate to small sample sizes” (p. 97). In this study, items loaded to expected factors, and communalities were acceptable. A sample of less than 300 was acceptable for the EFA. We expected this scale to be valid in all adults from Juarez, so we used the CFA to corroborate the factor structure using a new sample. The second sample, for the CFA and correlational analyses, was taken from the general population of Juarez to cross-validate the facture structure of the scale. Participants were approached in different neighborhoods of the city by university research assistants. It was a convenience sample as the neighborhoods were chosen from all areas of the city and, once they were chosen, research assistants would evaluate those who opened their doors and agreed to participate. First, people were invited to participate and were then given the informed consent statement that explained their rights. Next, the research assistants explained the purpose of the study and answered any questions. Participation for this study was entirely voluntary, and the participants were not given any credit or incentive in exchange for their responses.
Psychometric Properties
Exploratory Factor Analysis
The first step was to perform an EFA with the 52 items of the scale, using the unweighted least squares method with a promax rotation. This led to an initial solution of nine factors, but after analyzing the factor loadings, it was decided to explore other solutions with different numbers of factors. A six-factor structure solution was the best fit for the items (see Table 2). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index was .88 and the Bartlett’s sphericity test was statistically significant (p < .01), indicating normal distribution and adequate sample size for the EFA (Snedecor & Cochran, 1989). Items were excluded if the highest factor loading was less than .30 or if the difference between the two items with the highest factor loadings was less than .10, which meant the item had shared factor loadings.
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Child Abuse and Neglect Scale.
Note. Highest loadings are in bold; h2 = communalities; the items were developed and applied in Spanish, and were only translated to English for this table.
The six-factor structure included 46 items with unique factor loadings ranging from .35 to .99 (see Table 2). Six items were excluded because of shared factor loadings (items 20, 25, 26, 27, 36, 52). The first factor explained 34.21% of the total variance of the scale, and it was composed of eight items (items 28 to 35). According to the theme of these items, this factor was named “guilt.” The second factor explained 10.36% of the total variance, and it consisted of 10 items (items 38, and 43 to 51). The theme for these items was “relationship with parents.” The third factor explained 7.02% of the total variance, and it included eight items (items 15 to 19, 21, 22, 39). The theme for these items was “strong physical abuse.” The fourth factor explained 5.67% of the total variance, and it consisted of nine items (items 1 to 9). This factor was named “sexual abuse” according to the content of its items. The fifth factor explained 3.82% of the total variance, and it was composed of seven items (items 10 to 14, 23, 24). The theme of the items was “mild physical and verbal abuse.” The sixth factor explained 3.22% of the total variance, and it consisted of four items (items 37, 40, 41, 42). The theme for these items was “basic care.”
Internal reliabilities for large scale
The Cronbach’s alpha index was used to calculate the internal reliabilities. The factor of “guilt” obtained an internal reliability of α = .92; the factor of “relationship with parents,” α = .92; the factor of “strong physical abuse,” α = .91; the factor of “sexual abuse,” α = .90; the factor of “mild physical and verbal abuse,” α = .87; and the factor of “basic care,” α = .78.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
The best five items per factor were selected, except for the “basic care” factor, which only had four items, according to the highest factor loadings and the content of the items. The items selected for each factor are shown in Table 3. To cross-validate the six-factor structure of the scale, a CFA was used with the 29 chosen items. To calculate the model using a structural equation model, the variance of an item per factor had to be constrained to one (Byrne, 2009). To evaluate the model fit of the CFA, the following cutoff points per index were used to describe a good model fit (Hu & Bentler, 1999): Goodness of Fit (GFI) ≥ 0.90, Normed Fit Index (NFI) ≥ 0.90, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) ≥ 0.90, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) ≤ .06, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) ≤ .08. The resulting indices were: GFI = 0.90, NFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = .05, and SRMR = .06 and χ2(357) = 753.56 (p < .01). All fit indices were acceptable except for the χ2. In our analysis, the χ2 value was statistically significant, indicating a poor model fit, but it is important to note that this index is sensitive to large sample sizes, and it is almost always expected to be statistically significant even if the model shows a good fit (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002). Factor loadings for the items are reported in Table 3.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Child Abuse and Neglect Scale.
Internal reliabilities for short scale
The internal reliabilities for each of the factors were “guilt,” α = .85; “relationship with parents,” α = .87; “strong physical abuse,” α = .77; “sexual abuse,” α = .91; “mild physical and verbal abuse,” α = .83; and “basic care,” α = .82.
Correlations among the CANeS factors
The factors of the scale were correlated among each other. All correlations among factors were statistically significant (see Table 4), ranging from r = .23 to r = .81.
Correlations Among the Factors of the Child Abuse and Neglect Scale.
p < .01.
Selection of Other Measures
To evaluate concurrent validity, the six factors of the CANeS were correlated with scales that measure anxiety, depression, self-esteem, partner-violence, personality (big-five), fatalism, pessimism, internal locus of control, belief in good luck, and divine control (see Table 5). All the statistically significant correlations are small, ranging from r = .11 to r = .23.
Correlations Among the Factors of the Child Abuse and Neglect Scale and Other Related Constructs.
p < .05. **p < .01.
Final Version of the Scale and Prevalence
The final version of the scale was used to calculate the prevalence of CAN in both samples, a total of 763 participants, with each of the items of the CANeS (see Table 6). The factors with the greatest frequencies in their items were guilt, relationship with parents, and mild physical and verbal abuse. The following are examples of these higher frequencies: One of the most important findings is that 20.2% of the sample reported “being touched sexually by someone” in their childhood. Also, 11.8% of the sample reported that “someone made them perform a sexual act, like sexual intercourse or oral sex.” In the mild physical and verbal abuse scale, item 13, “being beaten with objects like belts or boards,” was reported by 35.9% of the sample, and items 23 (humiliated with words like dumb) and 24 (being told hurtful things), had values of 32.5% and 33.7%, respectively. In the relationship with parents, item 43 (my parents did not hug and kiss me) was reported by 25.3% of the sample.
Prevalence Per Item of the Child Abuse and Neglect Scale in the Total Sample.
Discussion
The factor structure of the CANeS was validated in a Northern Mexican sample, and it can be used to assess the prevalence of CAN in Mexican adults. The scale is composed of six factors (see Table 3) that measure the different types of CAN (CDC, 2019), and all of their internal reliabilities were good, with Cronbach’s alpha values greater than .70 (Kline, 2000). The factor structure was cross-validated with a CFA using a different sample that yielded appropriate goodness of fit indices (Hu & Bentler, 1999). The scale was designed to have few items per factor, which makes it practical to use in research and clinical settings without taking too much participant time.
In terms of diversity, this study includes a population that has not been studied in terms of CAN, and it adds new information about this construct from a specific Northern Mexican population to the scientific literature. Even though several U.S. studies sampled the Mexican American population, very few studies have been done in Mexico on this topic. Our findings add diversity to the knowledge of prevalence rates of CAN and also to the relationship between CAN and mental health–related behaviors. But there is a need to study these prevalence rates and relationships in other Mexican populations from several northern, central, and southern parts of Mexico to evaluate any possible differences or similarities. In terms of the diversity in the results, in our sample, the factor structure of the scale was similar to those in other countries, and the prevalence rates were also similar to those of other populations around the world.
The factors of the CANeS have statistically significant correlations with other constructs (see Table 5). The factor of strong physical abuse from the partner-violence scale had several moderate and strong positive correlations with the CANeS factors (Cohen, 1992), specifically with the strong physical abuse and the basic care factors. There is evidence in other studies indicating that people that are victims of child abuse tend to repeat the violent pattern in their partner relationships (e.g., Herrero et al., 2018; Kelmendi et al., 2019). The big-five personality scale had several statistically significant correlations even though most of them were small, and only one was moderate (Cohen, 1992). The personality factor with the highest correlations with the CANeS was the emotional stability factor, where people with higher CANeS scores tend to have lower emotional stability scores. The relationship between emotional stability and child abuse has been reported elsewhere (Lee & Song, 2017). Even though we found some small correlations between the CANeS and extraversion and openness to new experiences, other studies have also found statistically significant relationships among them (Pos et al., 2016; Yöyen, 2017). The anxiety scale had statistically significant correlations only with the mild physical and verbal abuse CANeS factor, and they were small (Cohen, 1992). Our findings partially support other studies where there have been stronger relationships between these constructs (Cantón-Cortés et al., 2019; Rehan et al., 2017).
Depression, self-esteem, and the fatalism scale factors had several statistically significant correlations with the CANeS factors but all of them were small (Cohen, 1992). There is evidence that child abuse is related to depression in adulthood (Negele et al., 2015), and it is suggested that child abuse may lead to depression due to a change in the brain structure (Opel et al., 2019). The relationship between child abuse and self-esteem has been observed in adolescents and young adults (Karakuş, 2012; Mwakanyamale & Yizhen, 2019) but not in older adults (Sachs-Ericsson et al., 2010). These are similar to our findings in which we found statistically significant (though small) correlations between child abuse and depression in adults, likely due to the fact that our sample is not as young as in other studies. No previous quantitative studies were found that analyze the relationship between fatalism and CAN. Our study indicates statistically significant correlations between them, but all of them are small.
Drug-related social violence has been part of Mexico since President Felipe Calderon declared war on its drug cartels in 2008, creating confusion and resulting in open warfare between drug cartels to obtain control of different cities around the country. Before 2008, the cartel that had control over the city of Juarez was known as the Juarez cartel. But as a result of this warfare, the Sinaloa cartel came and took control over the city’s drug-related activities. The fight is still ongoing in the city but the Sinaloa cartel is now more prevalent and in control of most of the city. These conflicts resulted in Juarez being ranked as the most violent city in the world from 2008 to 2010 (Quinones, 2016), which had significant consequences on the mental health of its inhabitants (Quiñones et al., 2013). In a recent study by the Citizens’ Council for Public Security and Criminal Justice (Linthicum, 2019), Juarez is ranked as the fifth most violent city in the world according to its homicide rate (86 homicides per 100,000 people). This culture of violence can affect other types of violence, such as CAN, and for this reason, it was important to measure prevalence in the people from Juarez.
According to the calculated prevalence rates in Juarez (Table 6), for sexual abuse, the rates were a little bit higher (item 1, 20.2%) than those reported by the WHO (2017), where 18% of girls and 8% of boys reported sexual abuse. We analyzed the prevalence rates for these two items by gender in this study, and the values were very similar. The physical abuse rate in the world was 23% (WHO, 2017) while in the Juarez sample, the rate was 35.9% (item 13). The WHO (2017) reports that 36% of people in the world have experienced emotional abuse, and in our sample, the rates were similar with 33.7% (item 24) and 32.5% (item 23). Finally, the rate in the world for physical neglect was 16% (WHO, 2017), while in Juarez, there were several items with higher prevalence rates such as item 43 (25.3%). The sample from Juarez indicates higher percentages in most of the CAN indicators than those reported by the WHO (2017), suggesting that mental health and other professionals need to attend to this situation of violence during childhood. Most of the efforts from government and civil associations focus on social violence, a more visible problem, and little is done to intervene with the less visible issues of family violence. But according to this study, issues of family violence are very present in Juarez. The implication for future study (and action) is that the issues of CAN must be identified, helped, and strengthened, and children in need must be protected. These are not issues that can be addressed easily. But without identification and early intervention, they will cause future problems in society that will persist until there is work done to promote a culture of peace in and for the nation’s families. The Mexican government created the National System of Integral Protection of Girls, Boys and Adolescents (NSIPGBA) to generate and carry out public policies to protect children and adolescents’ human rights in all levels of government. One the duties of the NSIPGBA is to celebrate agreements of coordination, collaboration, and concert with public and private, national and international bodies, including universities and civil associations. This study will help to promote their rights to a life free from violence and personal integrity, by creating policies that promote channels that can be easily accessed by all children and adolescents when in danger.
Further research should focus on validating the CANeS in other Mexican populations to corroborate its reliability and validity. Once the scale is validated in other places, CAN prevalence rates can be calculated in the entire country to promote national public policies to protect children and adolescents. Finally, the relation between the CANeS and other health-related constructs should be analyzed in future studies as in the ACE studies. Other health-related constructs could include cardiovascular disease, cancer, asthma, drug use and abuse, risk behaviors, distress, hopelessness, and disruptions in work, among others.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
