“I Am from the Ghetto,I Am Black,I Live in the Slum and They Think: Why Bother with Her?” – Racism in Seeking Help Experiences for Domestic Violence in Brazil
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2025
“I Am from the Ghetto,I Am Black,I Live in the Slum and They Think: Why Bother with Her?” – Racism in Seeking Help Experiences for Domestic Violence in Brazil
Despite the majority of Brazilians identifying as black, racial disparities are significant. Black women encounter disproportionate difficulties, with greater rates of homicide, unemployment, and poverty. After the Maria da Penha Law (2006), which is regarded as one of the most comprehensive laws to address domestic violence, there has been a notable increase in femicide among black women and a decrease in cases among white women. This paper aims to analyze the differences between white and black survivors of domestic violence in terms of the access and support they received from the violence against women multi agency network in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. To this end, in-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted with nine white and nine black women who were seeking help in the justice system in June of 2018. The IDI were analyzed under critical path and structural racism theories, in order to understand how inequality markers such as race might affect the institutional response to the survivor’s help seeking. The results indicated that black women received less information and support while seeking institutional help, as they faced more obstacles compared to white women. Among the interviewees critical paths, the access to the services was denied by providers 13 times for black women in contrast with 1 access denial for white women—also considering cases that discontinued the needed assistance due to institutional violence. The observed obstacles lived by black women in the multiagency network not only resulted in the path for these women toward support being longer but in many cases being repeated unsuccessfully multiple times. This study concludes that thus all women face obstacles while seeking help in formal institutions, black women may face greater barriers in this path due to how structural racism is reproduced in the services that should guarantee rights.
AlmeidaS. (2018). O que é racismo estrutural? [What is structural racism?]. Letramento.
2.
BardinL. (2000). Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis]. Edições 70.
3.
ButchartA.Garcia-MorenoC.MiktonC. (2010). Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: Global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety, and acceptability. World Health Organization.
ChoH. (2012). Racial differences in the prevalence of intimate partner violence against women and associated factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511416469
9.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
CrenshawK. (2002). Background paper for the expert meeting on the gender-related aspects of race discrimination. Estudos Feministas, 10(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2002000100011
12.
d’OliveiraA. F. P. L.SchraiberL. B.HanadaH.DurandJ. (2009). Comprehensive health (care) services to women in gender violence situation: An alternative to primary health care. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 14(4), 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232009000400011
13.
DavisA. Y. (1983). Women, race & class. Vintage Books.
14.
Garcia-MorenoC.JansenH. A.EllsbergM.HeiseL.WattsC. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8
GoesE. F.NascimentoE. R. (2013). Black and white women and the accessibility to preventive health services: An analysis of inequalities. Saúde em Debate, 37(99), 571–579.
17.
GonzalesL. L. (1984). Racismo e sexismo na cultura brasileira. Revista Ciências Sociais Hoje, 2(1), 223–244.
18.
GuimarãesA. S. A. (2009). Racismo e antirracismo no Brasil [Racism and anti-racism in Brazil]. Editora 34.
19.
HooksB. (1982). Ain’t I a woman—Black women and feminism. Pluto Press.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2023). Censo Demográfico 2022: Identificação étnico-racial da população, por sexo e idade [Demographic census 2022: Ethnic-racial identification of the population, by sex and age]. Author.
KalckmannS.SantoC. G.BatistaL. E.CruzV. M. (2007). Institutional racism: A challenge to equity in the National Health System (SUS)?. Saúde & Sociedade, 16(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902007000200014
24.
KilombaG. (2010). Plantation memories: Episodes of everyday racism. Unrast Verlag.
LealM. C.GamaS. G. M.CunhaC. B. (2005). Racial, sociodemographic, and prenatal and childbirth care inequalities in Brazil, 1999-2001. Revista de Saúde Pública, 39(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102005000100013
28.
MeneghelS. N.BairrosF.MuellerB.MonteiroD.OliveiraL. P.CollaziolM. E. (2011). Critical trajectories of female victims of gender violence: Discourse analysis of women and staff professionals in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 27(4), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000400013
29.
PasinatoW. (2011). Avanços e obstáculos na implementação da Lei 11.340/2006. In CamposC. H. (Ed.), Lei Maria da Penha: comentada em uma perspectiva jurídico-feminista (pp. 119–142). Lumen Juris.
30.
PasinatoW. (2015). Access to justice and domestic violence against women: The perception of legal operators and the limits to the application of the Maria da Penha Law. Revista Direito GV, 11(2), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-2432201518
RibeiroD. (2017). O que é lugar de fala? [What is a place of speech?]. Letramento.
33.
SaffiotiH. (2002). Violência contra a mulher e violência doméstica. In BruschiniC.UnberhaumS. G. (Eds.), Gênero, democracia e sociedade brasileira (pp. 321–338). Fundação Carlos Chagas/Editora 34.
SantosC. M. (2010). From women’s police stations to the Maria da Penha Law: The state’s absorption/translation of women’s demands. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 89(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.3759
36.
SchraiberL. B. (2012). Healthcare needs, public policies and gender: The perspective of professional practices. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 17(10), 2635–2644. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012001000013
37.
SchraiberL. B.d’OliveiraA. F. P. L.CoutoM. T. (2009). Violence and health: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical contributions from studies on violence against women. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 25(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001400003
38.
SchraiberL. B.d’OliveiraA. F. P. L.HanadaH.KissL. (2012). Assistance to women in situations of violence—The plot ofthe services to the intersectorial network. Athenea Digital, 12(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v12n3.1110
SignorelliM. C.de SouzaF. G.Pinheiro JuniorR. V. B.ValenteJ.AndreoniS.de RezendeL. F. M.SanchezZ. V. D. M. (2023). Panorama of intimate partner violence against women in Brazil and its association with self-perception of health: Findings from a National Representative Survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(13–14), 8453–8475. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231155141
SilveiraR. S.NardiH. C. (2014). Gender, race and ethnicity intersectionality and Maria da Penha’s law. Psicologia & Sociedade, 26(spe), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822014000500003
44.
SouzaN. S. (1983). Tornar-se negro. Graal.
45.
StukerP. (2023). Renúncias à representação criminal no âmbito da Lei Maria da Penha: práticas policiais e ações das mulheres em situação de violência. Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, 16(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4322/dilemas.v16.n.3.55821
46.
VillelaW. V.ViannaL. A. C.LimaL. F. P.SalaD. C. P.VieiraT. F.VieiraM. L.OliveiraE. M. (2011). Ambiguity and contradictions in the assistance provided for women who suffer violence. Saúde e Sociedade, 20(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000100014
