“I Did Not Want to Make a Bigger Deal Out of It than It Was”: A Mixed-Method Study on the Help-Seeking Behavior of Victims of Image-Based Sexual Harassment and Abuse
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2025
“I Did Not Want to Make a Bigger Deal Out of It than It Was”: A Mixed-Method Study on the Help-Seeking Behavior of Victims of Image-Based Sexual Harassment and Abuse
Experiencing image-based sexual harassment and abuse (IBSHA), or the sending of unsolicited nude or sexual images and the nonconsensual taking, sharing, or threats to share nude or sexual images, may have severe consequences for victims’ well-being. While seeking help may be beneficial, not every victim seeks help. Little research has been conducted on IBSHA victims’ help-seeking behavior. Therefore, the present mixed-method study examined the help-seeking behavior of IBSHA victims, particularly the barriers and facilitators to seeking help. The study used data from an online survey (N = 163) and interviews (N = 6) among 12-to-25-year-old victims. The quantitative data indicated that the majority of victims disclosed the incident (72.8%), but only a third received help (34.4%). Help-seekers reported greater experienced barriers to help-seeking, when compared to non-help-seekers. The experienced barriers positively predicted victims’ reported help-seeking behavior. From the qualitative data, four types of barriers were identified: (a) individual barriers (e.g., feelings of shame), (b) practical barriers (e.g., affordability of help), (c) interpersonal barriers (e.g., fear of negative reactions from one’s social environment), and (d) sociocultural barriers (e.g., normalization of IBSHA). Moreover, two types of facilitators were identified: (a) individual facilitators (e.g., the impact of victimization) and (b) interpersonal facilitators (e.g., social support). This suggests victims experience multiple barriers, which altogether can influence their help-seeking behavior. As a help-seeking trajectory is complex and unique to the individual, victims may encounter multiple new hurdles along the way. This may explain why help-seekers reported more barriers. The findings and corresponding implications highlight the importance of providing education on IBSHA and help-seeking on various levels in society.
AborisadeR. A. (2022). Image-based sexual abuse in a culturally conservative Nigerian society: Female victims’ narratives of psychosocial costs. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00536-3
2.
AdlerR. A.Chenoa CooperS. (2022). “When a tornado hits your life:” Exploring cyber sexual abuse survivors’ perspectives on recovery. Journal of Counseling Sexology & Sexual Wellness: Research, Practice, and Education, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.34296/04011067
3.
AustinP. C.SteyerbergE. W. (2017). Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 26(2), 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280214558972
4.
BachM. H.Beck HansenN.AhrensC.NielsenC. R.WalsheC.HansenM. (2021). Underserved survivors of sexual assault: A systematic scoping review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), 1895516. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1895516
5.
BatesS. (2017). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565
6.
BuddeJ.WitzC.BöhmM. (2022). Sexual boundary violations via digital media among students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 755752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755752
7.
CampbellJ. K.PoageS. M.GodleyS.RothmanE. F. (2022). Social anxiety as a consequence of non-consensually disseminated sexually explicit media victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP7268–NP7288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520967150
8.
CampbellR.GreesonM. R.Fehler-CabralG.KennedyA. C. (2015). Pathways to help: Adolescent sexual assault victims’ disclosure and help-seeking experiences. Violence Against Women, 21(7), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215584071
9.
CenseM.RedertA. (2022). Wat bepaalt de impact van online seksueel geweld? Verkennend onderzoek onder slachtoffers en hulpverleners. Rutgers Expertisecentrum seksualiteit.
de GraafH.van den BorneM.NikkelenS.TwiskD.MeijerS. (2017). Seks onder je 25e. Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2017. Rutgers and Soa Aids Nederland.
12.
DeLovehH. L.CattaneoL. B. (2017). Deciding where to turn: A qualitative investigation of college students’ helpseeking decisions after sexual assault. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1–2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12125
13.
DiTullioM. C.SullivanM. M. (2019). A feminist-informed narrative approach: Treating clients who have experienced image-based sexual abuse. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 31(2–3), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2019.1598619
14.
DodgeA. (2019). Nudes are forever: Judicial interpretations of digital technology’s impact on “Revenge Porn.”Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 34(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2019.4
15.
DodgeA.LockhartE. (2022). “Young people just resolve it in their own group”: Young people’s perspectives on responses to non-consensual intimate image distribution. Youth Justice, 22(3), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254211030570
16.
DouglassC. H.WrightC. J.DavisA. C.LimM. S. (2020). Non-consensual sharing of personal sexually explicit imagery among young people in Australia: Results from an online survey. Sexual Health, 17(2), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19147
17.
EdwardsK. M.MauerV. A.HuffM.Farquhar-LeicesterA.SuttonT. E.UllmanS. E. (2023). Disclosure of sexual assault among sexual and gender minorities: A systematic literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1608–1623. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211073842
18.
ErentzenC.Salerno-FerraroA. C.SchullerR. A. (2023). What guy wouldn’t want it? Male victimization experiences with female-perpetrated stranger sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 79(4), 1345–1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12559
FlynnA.PowellA.ScottA. J.CamaE. (2022). Deepfakes and digitally altered imagery abuse: A cross-country exploration of an emerging form of image-based sexual abuse. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(6), 1341–1358. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab111
22.
HenryN.FlynnA.PowellA. (2018). Policing image-based sexual abuse: Stakeholder perspectives. Police Practice and Research, 19(6), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2018.1507892
23.
HenryN.GaveyN.McGlynnC.RackleyE. (2023). “Devastating, like it broke me”: Responding to image-based sexual abuse in Aotearoa New Zealand. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 23(5), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221097276
24.
HenryN.McGlynnC.FlynnA.JohnsonK.PowellA.ScottA. J. (2020). Image-based sexual abuse: A study on the causes and consequences of non-consensual nude or sexual imagery. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351135153
25.
HenryN.VasilS.FlynnA.KellardK.MortreuxC. (2022). Technology-facilitated domestic violence against immigrant and refugee women: A qualitative study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP12634–NP12660. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211001465
26.
HuberA. R. (2023a). “A shadow of me old self”: The impact of image-based sexual abuse in a digital society. International Review of Victimology, 29(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580211063659
27.
HuberA. R. (2023b). Image-based sexual abuse: Legislative and policing responses. Criminology & Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221146141
28.
Hunehäll BerndtssonK. (2022). “Something you just don’t talk about”: An analysis of teenage boys’ experiences of non-consensual sexting in lower secondary school. Journal of Men’s Studies, 30(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265211042794
29.
Irvine-CollinsE.MooreE.CaoK.CurleyM.AblazaC.HeardE. (2023). Promoting compassionate responses to disclosures of sexual violence in university settings: Exploring the impact of a social marketing campaign. Violence Against Women, 29(9), 1832–1852. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221134822
30.
JørgensenC. R.WeckesserA.TurnerJ.WadeA. (2019). Young people’s views on sexting education and support needs: Findings and recommendations from a UK-based study. Sex Education, 19(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1475283
31.
KarasavvaV.ForthA. (2022). Personality, attitudinal, and demographic predictors of non-consensual dissemination of intimate images. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP19265–NP19289. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211043586
32.
KarasavvaV.SwanekJ.SmodisA.ForthA. (2023). From myth to reality: Sexual image abuse myth acceptance, the Dark Tetrad, and non-consensual intimate image dissemination proclivity. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 29(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2032430
33.
KellyL. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Polity Press.
34.
LiangB.GoodmanL.Tummala-NarraP.WeintraubS. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6
35.
LundeC.JolebyM. (2022). Being under pressure to sext: Adolescents’ experiences, reactions, and counter-strategies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(1), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12797
36.
MandauM. B. H. (2021). “Snaps”, “screenshots”, and self-blame: A qualitative study of image-based sexual abuse victimization among adolescent Danish girls. Journal of Children and Media, 15(3), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1848892
37.
McGlynnC.JohnsonK.RackleyE.HenryN.GaveyN.FlynnA.PowellA. (2021). “It’s torture for the soul”: The harms of image-based sexual abuse. Social & Legal Studies, 30(4), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920947791
MishnaF.MilneE.CookC.SlaneA.RingroseJ. (2023). Unsolicited sexts and unwanted requests for sexts: Reflecting on the online sexual harassment of youth. Youth & Society, 55(4), 630–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211058226
40.
NaezerM. (2018). Sexy adventures: An ethnography of youth, sexuality and social media. [Dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen]. Radboud University.
41.
NhassH. (2019). Niet jouw schuld!Kennisplatform Integratie & Samenleving.
42.
NollJ. G.HaagA C.ShenkC. E.WrightM. F.BarnesJ. E.KohramM.MalgaroliM.FoleyD. J.KourilM.BonannoG.A. (2022). An observational study of Internet behaviours for adolescent females following sexual abuse. Nature Human Behavior, 6, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01187-5
43.
O’MalleyR. L. (2023). Short-term and long-term impacts of financial sextortion on victim’s mental well-being. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(13–14), 8563–8592. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231156416
44.
OjedaM.Del ReyR. (2022). Lines of action for sexting prevention and intervention: A systematic review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 1659–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02089-3
45.
OliverV.FlickerS. (2023). Declining nudes: Canadian teachers’ responses to including sexting in the sexual health and human development curriculum. Sex Education, 24(3), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2023.2204223
46.
PallantJ. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
47.
PatelU.RoeschR. (2022). The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(2), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020958057
48.
PijlmanV.EichelsheimV.PembertonA.de WaardtM. (2023). “Sometimes it seems easier to push it away”: A study into the barriers to help-seeking for victims of sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(11–12), 7530–7555. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221147064
49.
PowellA.HenryN. (2014). Blurred lines? Responding to “sexting” and gender-based violence among young people. Children Australia, 39(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2014.9
PowellA.HenryN.FlynnA.ScottA. J. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: The extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian residents. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.009
52.
RackleyE.McGlynnC.JohnsonK.HenryN.GaveyN.FlynnA.PowellA. (2021). Seeking justice and redress for victim-survivors of image-based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies, 29, 293–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-021-09460-8
53.
RingroseJ.MilneB.MishnaF.RegehrK.SlaneA. (2022). Young people’s experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 93, 102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615
54.
RingroseJ.RegehrK.WhiteheadS. (2021). Teen girls’ experiences negotiating the ubiquitous dick pic: Sexual double standards and the normalization of image based sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 85(9), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01236-3
55.
SaldanaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
56.
SchaferS. (1968). The victim and his criminal: A study in functional responsibility. Random House.
57.
SciaccaB.MazzoneA.LoftssonM.O’Higgins NormanJ.FoodyM. (2023). Nonconsensual dissemination of sexual images among adolescents: Associations with depression and self-esteem. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(15–16), 9438–9464. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231165777
58.
SciaccaB.MazzoneA.NormanJ. O. H.FoodyM. (2021). Blame and responsibility in the context of youth produced sexual imagery: The role of teacher empathy and rape myth acceptance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103354
59.
SitV. (2018). The development and psychometric evaluation of the sexual assault help-seeking barriers scale [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
60.
Statistics Netherlands. (2023). Prevalence monitor for domestic violence and sexually inappropriate behavior (PHGSG). https://longreads.cbs.nl/phgsg-2022/
61.
StonerJ. E.CramerR. J. (2019). Sexual violence victimization among college females: A systematic review of rates, barriers, and facilitators of health service utilization on campus. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(4), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017721245
62.
UhlsY. T.EllisonN. B.SubrahmanyamK. (2017). Benefits and costs of social media in adolescence. Pediatrics, 140(Suppl 2), S67–S70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758E
63.
van MansomM.SchweglerV. (2021). Eigen schuld, dikke bult: een verkennend onderzoek naar financiële afpersing met naaktbeelden onder jongens. Expertisebureau Online Kindermisbruik.
64.
WalkerH. E.FreudJ. S.EllisR. A.FraineS. M.WilsonL. C. (2019). The prevalence of sexual revictimization: A meta-analytic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017692364
65.
WalshW. A.TenerD. (2022). “If you don’t send me five other pictures I am going to post the photo online”: A qualitative analysis of experiences of survivors of sextortion. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2022.2067093
WoodlockD.HarrisB. (2023). Digital abuse of women with disabilities. In HarrisB.WoodlockD. (Eds.), Technology and domestic and family violence (pp. 103–116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429316098
68.
ZviL. (2022). The double standard toward female and male victims of non-consensual dissemination of intimate images. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP20146–NP20167. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211050109
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
