An Exploration of Temporally Differentiated Associations Between Alcohol Outlets,Social Disorganization,and Assaults: A Multilevel Approach

Abstract

A substantial body of research consistently shows that the concentration of alcohol outlets is positively associated with violent crimes, such as assaults. While recent studies have incorporated both spatial and temporal dimensions of this relationship, particularly within-day variations, how this temporally differentiated association of alcohol outlets with violent crimes varies depending on the broader context, such as social disorganization, remains underexplored. This study addresses this research gap by investigating whether the relationship between alcohol outlets and assaults in New York City from 2017 to 2019 differs by time of the day, while accounting for neighborhood structures in terms of their independent and conditional associations with assaults. Data on assaults, alcohol outlets, and neighborhood characteristics were acquired from various open sources, resulting in a dataset with 37,259 census blocks embedded within 2,090 census tracts. Using the 2015 to 2019 American Time Use Survey report, this study divided the day into four periods—morning, daytime, evening, and night—and applied a series of multilevel negative binomial regressions to capture the geographically hierarchical structure between census blocks and census tracts. Findings reveal that on-premises alcohol outlets, grocery/convenience stores, liquor/wine stores, and social disorganization indicators are positively associated with assaults throughout the day. The only exception is racial heterogeneity at night. Furthermore, cross-level interaction analyses indicate that the significance of the interaction terms differs by the time of day, the type of alcohol outlets, and social disorganization indicators. Furthermore, the relationship between alcohol outlets and assaults is weaker in more disorganized neighborhoods. These results highlight the importance of considering crime opportunity, social disorganization, and temporal dynamics in understanding the relationship between alcohol outlets and crime. Limitations and implications for future research and policy are also discussed.

Keywords

alcohol outlet crime opportunity social disorganization assault multilevel analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

(2012, September 10). When can you safely ignore multicollinearity?. Statistical Horizons. https://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity/

Anselin

Cohen

Cook

Gorr

Tita

(2000). Spatial analyses of crime. Criminal Justice: Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, 4(2), 213–262.

Bernasco

Block

(2011). Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810384135

Bernasco

Ruiter

Block

(2017). Do street robbery location choices vary over time of day or day of week? A test in Chicago. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(2), 244–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816680681

Block

(1995). Space, place and crime: Hot spot areas and hot places of liquor-related crime. Crime Prevention Studies, 4, 145–183.

Boessen

Hipp

J. R.

(2015). Close-ups and the scale of ecology: Land uses and the geography of social context and crime. Criminology, 53(3), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12074

Boggess

L. N.

Hipp

J. R.

(2010). Violent crime, residential instability and mobility: Does the relationship differ in minority neighborhoods? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9093-7

Brantingham

(1995). Criminality of place. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02242925

Bursik

R. J.

Jr. Grasmick

H. G.

(1993). Economic deprivation and neighborhood crime rates, 1960–1980 symposium: Crime, class, and community—An emerging paradigm. Law & Society Review, 27(2), 263–284.

10.

Chamberlain

A. W.

Hipp

J. R.

(2015). It’s all relative: Concentrated disadvantage within and across neighborhoods and communities, and the consequences for neighborhood crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.08.004

11.

Cohen

Tita

(1999). Diffusion in homicide: Exploring a general method for detecting spatial diffusion processes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(4), 451–493.

12.

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

13.

Cunradi

C. B.

(2010). Neighborhoods, alcohol outlets and intimate partner violence: Addressing research gaps in explanatory mechanisms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7030799

14.

Deryol

Wilcox

Logan

Wooldredge

(2016). Crime places in context: An illustration of the multilevel nature of hot spot development. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9278-1

15.

Felson

(1987). Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Criminology, 25(4), 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1987.tb00825.x

16.

Fotheringham

A. S.

Wong

D. W. S.

(1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 23(7), 1025–1044. https://doi.org/10.1068/a231025

17.

Graham

Bernards

Osgood

D. W.

Wells

(2006). Bad nights or bad bars? Multi-level analysis of environmental predictors of aggression in late-night large-capacity bars and clubs. Addiction, 101(11), 1569–1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01608.x

18.

Groff

E. R.

Lockwood

(2014). Criminogenic facilities and crime across street segments in Philadelphia: Uncovering evidence about the spatial extent of facility influence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(3), 277–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427813512494

19.

Haberman

C. P.

Ratcliffe

J. H.

(2015). Testing for temporally differentiated relationships among potentially criminogenic places and census Block Street Robbery Counts. Criminology, 53(3), 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12076

20.

Haley

S. J.

Jardine

S. J.

Kelvin

E. A.

Herrmann

Maroko

A. R.

(2023). Neighborhood alcohol outlet density, historical redlining, and violent crime in NYC 2014–2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043212

21.

Heisig

J. P.

Schaeffer

(2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053

22.

Hipp

J. R.

(2007). Income inequality, race, and place: Does the distribution of race and class within neighborhoods affect crime rates?. Criminology, 45(3), 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00088.x

23.

Hipp

J. R.

Kim

Y.-A.

J. C.

(2021). Micro-scale, meso-scale, macro-scale, and temporal scale: Comparing the relative importance for robbery risk in New York City. Justice Quarterly, 38(5), 767–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1730423

24.

Jacobs

(1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.

25.

Jones

Manley

Johnston

Owen

(2018). Modeling residential segregation as unevenness and clustering: A multilevel modeling approach incorporating spatial dependence and tackling the MAUP. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(6), 1122–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318782703

26.

Jones

R. W.

Pridemore

W. A.

(2019). Toward an integrated multilevel theory of crime at place: Routine activities, social disorganization, and the law of crime concentration. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(3), 543–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-018-9397-6

27.

Kornhauser

R. R.

(1978). Social sources of delinquency: An appraisal of analytic models. University of Chicago Press.

28.

Krivo

L. J.

Peterson

R. D.

(1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75(2), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580416

29.

Kubrin

C. E.

(2000). Racial heterogeneity and crime: Measuring static and dynamic effects (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2029101). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2029101

30.

Kubrin

C. E.

Branic

Hipp

J. R.

(2022). (Re)conceptualizing neighborhood ecology in social disorganization theory: From a variable-centered approach to a neighborhood-centered approach. Crime & Delinquency, 68(11), 2008–2032. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211041527

31.

Livingston

(2011). A longitudinal analysis of alcohol outlet density and domestic violence. Addiction, 106(5), 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03333.x

32.

Livingston

Chikritzhs

Room

(2007). Changing the density of alcohol outlets to reduce alcohol-related problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26(5), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230701499191

33.

Madensen

T. D.

Eck

J. E.

(2008). Violence in bars: Exploring the impact of place manager decision-making. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2008.2

34.

Mize

(2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6, 81–117. https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a4

35.

New York City Mayor’s Public Engagement Unit. (2025). Rent Stabilization. City of New York. https://www.nyc.gov/site/mayorspeu/programs/rent-stabilization.page

36.

O’Brien

R. M.

(2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

37.

Osgood

D. W.

(2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43.

38.

Piza

E. L.

Welsh

B. C.

Farrington

D. P.

Thomas

A. L.

(2019). CCTV surveillance for crime prevention. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12419

39.

Pridemore

W. A.

Grubesic

T. H.

(2012). Community organization moderates the effect of alcohol outlet density on violence. The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 680–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01432.x

40.

Ratcliffe

J. H.

Taniguchi

Taylor

R. B.

(2009). The crime reduction effects of public CCTV Cameras: A multi-method spatial approach. Justice Quarterly, 26(4), 746–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902873852

41.

Rodrigues

Philibert

Hébert

(2024). Assessing the association between neighbourhood sociodemographic characteristics and adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 33(7), 2057–2074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02869-0

42.

Roncek

D. W.

Bell

(1981). Bars, blocks, and crimes. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.2190/R0G0-FRWY-100J-6KTB

43.

Roncek

D. W.

Maier

P. A.

(1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “Hot Spots”. Criminology, 29(4), 725–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01086.x

44.

Sampson

R. J.

Groves

W. B.

(1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068

45.

Schnell

Braga

A. A.

Piza

E. L.

(2017). The influence of community areas, neighborhood clusters, and street segments on the spatial variability of violent crime in Chicago. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9313-x

46.

Shaw

C. R.

McKay

H. D.

(1942). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. University of Chicago Press.

47.

Snijders

T. A.

Bosker

R. J.

(2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage.

48.

Snowden

A. J.

(2018). Alcohol availability and violence: A closer look at space and time. International Regional Science Review, 41(6), 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017617745666

49.

Snowden

A. J.

Freiburger

T. L.

(2015). Alcohol outlets, social disorganization, and robberies: Accounting for neighborhood characteristics and alcohol outlet types. Social Science Research, 51, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.011

50.

Tillyer

M. S.

Wilcox

Walter

R. J.

(2021). Crime generators in context: Examining ‘Place in Neighborhood’ propositions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37(2), 517–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09446-5

51.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). Advanced Search. https://data.census.gov/advanced

52.

Vélez

M. B.

(2001). The role of public social control in urban neighborhoods: A multilevel analysis of victimization risk. Criminology, 39(4), 837–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00942.x

53.

Weisburd

Groff

E. R.

Yang

S.-M.

(2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press.

54.

Welsh

B. C.

Farrington

D. P.

(2008). Effects of improved street lighting on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2008.13

55.

Wilcox

Tillyer

M. S.

(2017). Place and neighborhood context. In Weisburd

Eck

(Eds.), Unraveling the crime-place connection (Vol. 22, pp. 121–142). Routledge.

56.

Williams

S. A.

(2024). Decomposing neighbourhood (in)stability: The structural determinants of turnover and implications for neighbourhood crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 64(2), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azad034

57.

J. C.

(2019). Mixed land use and neighborhood crime. Social Science Research, 78, 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.010

58.

J. C.

(2022). Neighborhood effects on crime: The concentration of racial/ethnic groups and the heterogeneity among such groups. Crime & Delinquency, 70(11), 2958–2985. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221134592

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB