Why Do Working Women Experience More Violence Than Non-Working Women in India? A Decomposition Analysis Using Nationally Representative Survey Data

Abstract

In India, multiple studies highlight that the prevalence and odds of intimate partner violence (IPV) is higher among working women than non-working women. Such evidence, though counterintutive, dismantles the notion that women’s employment substantially reduces IPV or acts as a protective factor. To explore this anomaly, our study utilizes data from the National Family Health Survey (2019-21) and quantitatively examines the factors of IPV in relation with women’s employment status in the Indian context. In the first step, a logistic regression model has been deployed to analyse the factors of IPV among women in India. This analysis is followed by Fairlie Decomposition to investigate the factors that contribute to higher IPV prevalence among working women in India. The decomposition model explained 49% of the gap in IPV across working status of women. Men’s controlling behavior (−32.3%) and alcohol consumption (−32.3%), which are significant risk factors of IPV, collectively contributed about 65% in this explained gap in IPV, reducing the IPV gap between working and non-working women. Other significant contributors were women’s justification of IPV (−14.17%), women’s education (−11.08%), household wealth (−8.05%), religion (−17.92%), region (−3.52%), number of children (−3.89%), and internet use (−2.39%) reducing the gap whereas residence (3.57%) and caste category (2.62%) contributed to widening the gap. The current study finds an explanation for the uncharacteristic role of employment in relation to IPV, exposing men’s characteristics such as controlling behavior and alcoholism as the main drivers of IPV across working and non-working women overriding the preventive effects of employment. Policies related to violence against women are recommended to shift and gear their focus on targeted interventions with men to address the perpetration behavior alongside women’s education, social categories, residence, etc., to prevent IPV among women in India.

Keywords

working women intimate partner violence Fairlie decomposition spousal violence men’s role in IPV logistic regression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

K. L.

(1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 655. https://doi.org/10.2307/353952

Atkinson

M. P.

Greenstein

T. N.

Lang

M. M.

(2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00206.x

Bhattacharyya

Bedi

A. S.

Chhachhi

(2011). Marital violence and women’s employment and property status: Evidence from North Indian villages. World Development, 39(9), 1676–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.001

Blinder

A. S.

(1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. The Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/144855

Chandra

Srivastava

Mukherjee

Singh

Patel

J. K.

(2023a). Men’s childhood exposure to parental violence and their indulgence in IPV: An empirical analysis of wife-beating justification as a moderator variable. Victims & Offenders, 19, 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2218358

Chandra

Srivastava

Singh

Mukherjee

Patel

J. K.

(2023b). Locating perpetrators of violence against women in India: An analysis of married men’s characteristics associated with intimate partner violence. PLoS One, 18(8), e0289596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289596

Cools

Kotsadam

(2017). Resources and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 95, 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.027

Dalal

(2011). Does economic empowerment protect women from intimate partner violence? Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 3(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v3i1.76

Dalal

Yasmin

Dahlqvist

Klein

G. O.

(2022). Do electronic and economic empowerment protect women from intimate partner violence (IPV) in India? BMC Women’s Health, 22(1), 510. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02110-4

10.

Dhanaraj

Mahambare

(2022). Male Backlash and female guilt: Women’s employment and intimate partner violence in urban India. Feminist Economics, 28(1), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1986226

11.

Dildar

(2021). Is economic empowerment a protective factor against intimate partner violence? Evidence from Turkey. The European Journal of Development Research, 33(6), 1695–1728. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00311-x

12.

Eggers Del Campo

Steinert

J. I

. (2022). The effect of female economic empowerment interventions on the risk of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(3), 810–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020976088

13.

Eswaran

Malhotra

(2011). Domestic violence and women’s autonomy in developing countries: Theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’économique, 44(4), 1222–1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01673.x

14.

Fairlie

R. W.

(2006). An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition Technique to Logit and Probit Models (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1917). https://ssrn.com/abstract=497302.

15.

Hautzinger

(2003). Researching men’s violence: personal reflections on ethnographic data. Men and Masculinities, 6(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03253139

16.

Heise

L. L.

(2013). Determinants of partner violence in low and middle-income countries: Exploring variation in individual and population-level risk [PhD thesis. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine].

17.

International Institute for Population Sciences & ICF. (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India. IIPS.

18.

Jewkes

(2002). Intimate partner violence: Causes and prevention. The Lancet, 359(9315), 1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08357-5

19.

Macmillan

Gartner

(1999). When she brings home the Bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(4), 947. https://doi.org/10.2307/354015

20.

Muthengi

Gitau

Austrian

(2016). Is working risky or protective for married adolescent girls in urban slums in Kenya? Understanding the association between working status, savings and intimate-partner violence. PLoS One, 11(5), e0155988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155988

21.

Oaxaca

(1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981

22.

Sahoo

Raju

(2007). Domestic violence in India: Evidences and implications for working women. Social Change, 37(4), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/004908570703700407

23.

Sardinha

Maheu-Giroux

Stöckl

Meyer

S. R.

García-Moreno

(2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. The Lancet, 399(10327), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7

24.

Srivastava

Sharma

Khanna

(2014). Domestic violence in working and nonworking women. Indian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-1505.262255

25.

StataCorp. (2019). Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC.

26.

Stöckl

Hassan

Ranganathan

M. M.

Hatcher

(2021). Economic empowerment and intimate partner violence: A secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional Demographic Health Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Women’s Health, 21(1), 241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01363-9

27.

UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Women’s Economic Empowerment. (2016). Leave no one behind: A call to action for gender equality and women’s economic empowerment. UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Women’s Economic Empowerment. https://www.empowerwomen.org/en/resources/documents/2016/09/leave-no-one-behind?

28.

Villarreal

(2007). Women’s employment status, coercive control, and intimate partner violence in Mexico. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00374.x

29.

Vyas

Watts

(2009). How does economic empowerment affect women’s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. Journal of International Development, 21(5), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1500

30.

Wathen

C. N.

MacGregor

J. C. D.

MacQuarrie

B. J.

(2018). Relationships among intimate partner violence, work, and health. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(14), 2268–2290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515624236

31.

World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. World Health Organization.

32.

Zafar

Zia

Amir-ud-Din

(2022). Troubling trade-offs between women’s work and intimate partner violence: Evidence from 19 developing countries. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16180–NP16205. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211021961.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB