Abstract
Intimate partner violence is a widespread social problem with severe consequences for victims. While most research has focused on unidirectional violence, evidence shows that bidirectional violence (BV) is the most common form within intimate relationships. Its recognition, however, is often limited by gender stereotypes that portray women exclusively as victims and men as perpetrators. This study aimed to examine whether university students’ judgments about BV varied according to the proportion of violence, the type of violence, and the initiator of violence, using three immersive virtual reality (VR) scenarios. A total of 162 university students were randomly assigned to view one of the scenarios and subsequently completed a questionnaire. Results showed that physical violence was perceived as more severe than psychological violence, “female-dominated” violence was judged more severely than “male-dominated,” and women were judged more harshly when initiating conflict. No gender differences were found in judgments of responsibility, seriousness, or injury severity in the “male domination” scenario. These findings suggest that prevention and intervention strategies should move beyond gender-based assumptions, adopting inclusive approaches that address all victims’ experiences and challenge prevailing gender stereotypes.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
