This study examined the relative acceptability of dating violence. Using an experimental design, subjects read descriptions of dating violence that varied according to the seriousness of the relationship, the sex of the perpetrator, and the setting in which the violence took place. Subjects were more tolerant of violent behavior when the depicted relationship was serious and when the perpetrator was female. Relationship status affected not only acceptability but also the appropriateness of various actions that might be taken following the episode, particularly those that would alter or end the relationship. Violent behavior by a male was judged to be less acceptable, more injurious, and more criminal. In addition, relative to female victims, male victims were seen as needing less recourse or redress. Male and female subjects presented essentially similar histories of dating violence (both victimization and perpetration), and previous experience did not affect responses to the dating scenarios.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arias, I. , & Johnson, P. (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 298-307.
2.
Arias, I. , Samios, M., & O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 82-90.
3.
Bernard, M. L. , & Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as a model for love relationships.Family Relations, 32, 283-286.
4.
Billingham, R. E. , & Sack, A. R. (1986). Courtship violence and the interactive status of the relationship.Journal of Adolescent Research, 3, 315-325.
5.
Burke, P. J. , Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Gender identity, self-esteem and physical and sexual abuse in dating relationships. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships (pp. 72-93). New York: Praeger.
6.
Carlson, B. E. (1987). Dating violence: A research review and comparison with spouse abuse.Social Casework, 68, 16-23.
7.
Cate, R. M. , Henton, J. M., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., & Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social-psychological perspective.Journal of Family Issues, 3, 79-90.
8.
Clayton, R. R. (1979). The family, marriage, and social change.Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
9.
Durst, M. (1987). Perceived peer abuse among college students: A research note.NASPA [National Association of Student Personnel Administrators] Journal, 24, 42-47.
10.
Fernstermaker, S. (1989). Acquaintance rape on campus: Attributions of crime. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships (pp. 257-271). New York: Praeger.
11.
Gelles, R. J. (1972). The violent home.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Gelles, R. J. , & Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In W. R. Burr, I. F. Nye, & I. L. Reis (Eds.), Contemporary views about the family (Vol. 1, pp. 549-581). New York: Free Press.
13.
Harris, M. B. (1991). Effects of sex of aggressor, sex of target, and relationship on evaluations of physical aggression.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 174-186.
14.
Henton, J. , Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., & Christopher, S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships.Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467-482.
15.
Hilton, N. Z. (1989). When is an assault not an assault? The Canadian public's attitudes toward wife and stranger assault.Journal of Family Violence, 4, 323-337.
16.
Jorgenson, S. R. (1986). Marriage and the family: Development and change.New York: Macmillan.
17.
Kanin, E. (1957). Male aggression in dating-courtship relations.American Journal of Sociology, 6, 179-204.
18.
Kirkpatrick, C. , & Kanin, E. (1959). Male aggression on a university campus.American Sociological Review, 22, 52-58.
19.
Lane, K. , & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex.Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45-49.
20.
Laner, M. R. (1983). Courtship abuse and aggression: Contextual aspects.Sociological Spectrum, 3, 69-83.
21.
Laner, M. R. , & Thompson, J. (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples.Deviant Behavior, 3, 229-244.
22.
Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students.Family Relations, 30, 97-102.
23.
Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization.Family Relations, 35, 383-388.
24.
Makepeace, J. M. (1989). In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships (pp. 94-107). New York: Praeger.
25.
Matthews, W. J. (1984). Violence in college couples.College Student Journal, 18, 150-158.
26.
Roscoe, B. (1985). Courtship violence: Acceptable forms and situations.College Student Journal, 19, 389-393.
27.
Roscoe, B. , & Benaske, N. (1985). Courtship violence experienced by abused wives: Similarities in patterns of abuse.Family Relations, 34, 419-424.
28.
Saunders, D. G. , & Size, P. B. (1986). Attitudes about woman abuse among police officers, victims and victim advocates.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 25-42.
29.
Stark, R. , & McEvoy, J. (1970). Middle class violence.Psychology Today, 4, 52-65.
30.
Stets, J. E. , & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships.Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 237-246.
31.
Stets, J. E. , & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Patterns of physical and sexual abuse for men and women in dating relationships: A descriptive analysis.Journal of Family Violence, 4, 63-76.
32.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scales.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-86.
33.
Sugarman, D. B. , & Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships (pp. 3-32). New York: Praeger.
34.
Tetreault, P. A. , & Barnett, M. A. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353-358.
