Creating Standardized Metrics and Benchmarking for Health,Absence and Productivity Management Programs: The EMPAQ Initiative

Abstract

Prudent feedback from employer surveys has indicated that standardized metrics and integrated decision-support tools are essential for identifying opportunities to improve programs and reinforce a culture of health and productivity. This article reports on an innovative, nationally standardized metric and benchmarking initiative that provides employers with practical workplace tools and solutions to evaluate the effectiveness of their company’s health, absence and productivity management programs, including workers’ compensation, family and medical leave, disability, incidental absence, employee assistance programs and group health. The initiative, titled EMPAQ (Employer Measures of Productivity, Absence and Quality), was created in 2001 by the National Business Group on Health’s Council on Employee Health and Productivity (CEHP). EMPAQ was successfully launched and implemented by many major companies nationwide in 2003. EMPAQ data collection, analysis and reporting are performed through a partnership with the University of Michigan Health Management Research Center (UM-HMRC). To date, more than 1,600 employers from 21 U.S. industry sectors have submitted more than 30,000 standardized data sets, including industry-level detail and demographic data, for benefit program benchmarking and analysis. The development of EMPAQ standardized metrics has helped employers bring data to life and served as an industry-wide tool for change in how benefit programs are designed, delivered and measured.

Keywords

standardized metrics benefit program performance benchmarking program evaluation EMPAQ

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Informational references to the Business Group, including its Council and Institute entities, positions on national economic and health issues, EMPAQ program statistics and its program and educational components, were obtained from www.businessgrouphealth.org, www.empaq.org, EMPAQ benchmarking reports and Business Group staff.

Kessler, R.C. , & Stang, P.E. (2006). Health and work productivity: Making the business case for quality health care. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 17.

Hann, L.W. ( 2009). Reigning in returns. Leader’s Edge. Available at http://www.leadersedgemagazine.com/archive/June-2009/feature_C.htm

Stevens, M. ( 2003). Maximum EMPAQ. Human Resources Executive.Available at http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/story.jsp?storyId=4222159&query=EMPAQ

Kerr. M. ( 2006). Measure for measure. Risk & Insurance , June, 32-34. Also available at http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/story.jsp?storyId=5669763&query=EMPAQ

Hall, R. ( 2007). Calculating the cost of absence. Risk & Insurance, October 15, 64-66.

Stattner, K. ( 2008). Total absence management: A solution for managing the cost of absence by investing in employee health . Position paper. Hewitt Associates . Available at http://www.hewittassociates.com/_MetaBasicCMAssetCache_/Assets/Articles/2008/Hewitt_positionpaper_TotalAbsenceMgmt_1008.pdf

Developed by the Business Group/EMPAQ for publication with SHRM Online’s Compensation & Benefits Focus Area article, Short-term disability plan design: Effects on employee behavior and outcomes, April 23, 2007. Available at www.shrm.org

Loeppke, R. , et al. (2007). Health and productivity as a business strategy . Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49, 712-721.

10.

EMPAQ® Workshop (2009): Why EMPAQ? Why Now? 23rd National Conference on Health, Productivity, and Human Capital, October 13, 2009, Philadelphia, PA.

11.

Edington, D. ( 2009). Zero trends: Health as a serious economic strategy. Ann Arbor: Health Management Research Center, University of Michigan, 9-14.

12.

National Business Group on Health (2009). EMPAQ® Executive Summary of Annual Summary Research Report for 2008 Program Data. Released October 2009