Abstract
Traditional long-term executive incentive plans (LTIPs) too often fail in volatile markets because they rely on fixed, absolute targets that are susceptible to overconfidence bias and unpredictable external economic shifts. These impacts result in erratic payouts, alternating between windfall gains and demotivating zeros, that fail to align executive incentives with genuine performance. This article employs Trane Technologies as an illustrative case, drawing on publicly disclosed financial data from 2015 through 2024, to demonstrate a more resilient alternative: the Indexed LTIP. By adding operating metrics such as revenue growth and EBITDA against industry peers and utilizing a percentile ranking system, the approach offers boards and compensation committees a stress-tested methodology to reduce payout volatility and improve long-term alignment with shareholder interests.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
