A Cross-cultural Comparison of The Apparel Spatial Visualization Test and Paper Folding Test

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of culture and training on performance of spatial tasks by administering the Paper Folding Test and Apparel Spatial Visualization Test to students from two cultures at the beginning and end of semester classes in apparel design, analyzing the correlation between the two tests, and collecting information on strategies used by students to select answers to test items on the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test. Participants consisted of 133 university students in Korea and the United States. Five U.S. and five Korean students participated in the retrospective interviews. In a pre-test/post-test comparison group design, participants completed the Paper Folding Test and Apparel Spatial Visualization Test at the beginning and end of semester classes in flat pattern, tailoring, and beginning construction. The Paper Folding Test and Apparel Spatial Visualization Test were significantly correlated indicating that the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test measures approximately the same spatial ability as the Paper Folding Test - spatial visualization - but specific to the intended domain. T-tests revealed Korean, compared to U.S., students had higher pre-test scores on the Paper Folding Test but not on the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test. A paired t-test showed that, overall, students improved significantly on both the Paper Folding Test and Apparel Spatial Visualization Test as a result of training received in their classes; improvement scores of Korean and U.S. students were not significantly different. Retrospective interviews uncovered seven strategies used by both U.S. and Korean students to solve problems on the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test: stimulus analysis, extraction of landmarks, matching, elimination, checking, relying on expectations based on prior knowledge, and guessing.

Keywords

spatial abilities apparel design cross-cultural

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A. (1954). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.

Aneroid, V. (1989). Use of 3D graphics to improve visualization skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 51(2), 25-29.

Baron, J. (1978). Intelligence and general strategies. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 403-450). New York: Academic Press.

Braukmann, J. , & Pedras, M. (1993). A comparison of two methods of teaching visualization skills to college students. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 30(2), 65-80.

Childers, T. , Houston, M. , & Heckler, S. (1985). Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 125-134.

Davis, M. (1996). Visual design in dress (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

DeLong, M. (1998). The way we look: Dress and aesthetics (2nd ed.). New York: Fairchild.

Ekstrom, R. , French, J. , Harman, H. , & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.

Fredette, B. (1995). What is the relationship between artistic performance and visual proficiency? In Imagery and visual literacy: Selected readings from the annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (26th, Tempe, Arizona, October 12-16, 1994, pp. 1-9). (ERIC Doument Reproduction Service No. ED 380099)

10.

Greenfield, P. (1997). Culture as process: Empirical methods for cultural psychology. In J. Berry , Y. Poortinga , & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology Vol. 1: Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 301-346). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

11.

Han, S. , & Ahn, C. (1994). Collectivism and individualism in Korea. In G. Yoon & S. Choi (Eds.), Psychology of the Korean people: Collectivism and individualism (pp. 301-316). Seoul, Korea: Dong-A Publishing & Printing Co.

12.

Hershkowitz, R. , & Markovits, Z. (1992, May). Conquer mathematics concepts by developing visual thinking. Arithmetic Teacher, 38-41.

13.

Hudson, W. (1960). Pictorial depth perception in sub-cultural groups in Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 183-208.

14.

Lajoie, S. (1986). Individual differences in spatial ability: A computerized tutor for orthographic projection tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Stanford.

15.

Linn, M. , & Petersen, A. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.

16.

Lord, T. (1987). Spatial teaching. Science Teacher, 54(2), 32-34.

17.

Mack, T. (1994). The effect of training in computer-aided design on the spatial visualization ability of selected gifted adolescents. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 31(2), 28-43.

18.

Mayes, J. (1982). Hemisphere function and spatial ability: An exploratory study of sex and cultural differences. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 65-80.

19.

McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities. New York: Praeger.

20.

Miller, R. (1973). Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials. Psychological Bulletin, 80(2), 135-150.

21.

Newcombe, N. , Bandura, M. , & Taylor, D. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9(3), 377-386.

22.

Orzada, B. T. , & Kallal, M. J. (1998). Students’ spatial visualization abilities and style of processing preferences [Abstract]. In N. J. Owens (Ed.), ITAA Proceedings (p. 68-68). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.

23.

Orzada, B. T. , & Kallal, M. J. (2001). Relationship of spatial visualization skills to style of processing preferences. In R. E. Griffin , V. S. Williams , & J. Lee (Eds.), Exploring the visual future: Art, design, science, & technology: Selected readings of the International Visual Literacy Association, pp. 363-367.

24.

Robinson, J. O. (1972). The psychology of visual illusion. London: Hutchinson & Co. Publishers, Ltd.

25.

Rock, I. , Wheeler, D. , & Tudor, L. (1989). Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? Cognitive Psychology, 21, 185-210.

26.

Salthouse, T. , Babcock, R. , Mitchell, D. , Palmon, R. , & Skovronek, E. (1990). Sources of individual differences in spatial visualization ability. Intelligence, 14, 187-230.

27.

Salthouse, T. , & Mitchell, D. (1990). Effects of age and naturally occurring experience on spatial visualization performance. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 845-854.

28.

Schwarz, P. (1961). Adapting tests to the cultural setting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(4), 673-686.

29.

Schwitzgebel, R. (1962). The performance of Dutch and Zulu adults on selected perceptual tasks. Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 73-77.

30.

Serpell, R. (1979). How specific are perceptual skills? A cross-cultural study of pattern reproduction. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 365-380.

31.

Signorella, M. , Krupa, M. , Jamison, W. , & Lyons, N. (1986). A short version of a spatial activity questionnaire. Sex Roles, 14(9/10), 475-479.

32.

Snow, R. (1980). Aptitude processes. In R. Snow , P. Federico , & W. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. 1. Cognitive process analyses of aptitude (pp. 27-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

33.

Solano-Flores, G. , & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 553-573.

34.

Tartre, L. (1990). Spatial skills, gender, and mathematics. In E. Fennema & G. C. Leder (Eds), Mathematics and Gender (pp. 27-59). New York: Teachers College Press.

35.

Vicente, K. , Hayes, B. , & Williges, R. (1987). Assaying and isolating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. Human Factors, 29, 349-359.

36.

Voyer, D. , Voyer, S. , & Bryden, M. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270.

37.

Workman, J. (1999). Apparel spatial visualization test and paper folding test [Abstract]. In N. J. Owens (Ed.), ITAA Proceedings (p. 83-83). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.

38.

Workman, J. , Caldwell, L. , & Kallal, M. (1999). Development of a test to measure spatial abilities associated with apparel design and product development. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(3), 128-133.

39.

Workman, J. , & Zhang, L. (1999). Relationship of general and apparel spatial visualization ability. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(4), 169-175.