This study examines the effects of indirect training provided by apparel design and product development courses on spatial visualization skills. Spatial visualization skills are measured by using the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test, a domain-specific measure of spatial visualization, and the Paper Folding Test, a general measure of spatial visualization. In a pretestposttest comparison group design, 128 students completed the two tests at the beginning and end of semester courses. Test scores indicate student improvement on both tests of spatial visualization during the course of a semester. Students in Beginning Clothing Construction improved significantly more on the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test than students in Flat Pattern and Computer Aided Design. Students in Computer Aided Design improved significantly more on the Paper Folding Test than students in Beginning Clothing Construction and Flat Pattern. Results support the viability of indirect training provided in these courses as a means to improve spatial visualization skills.
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327-344.
2.
Braukmann, J., & Pedras, M. (1993). A comparison of two methods of teaching visualization skills to college students. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 30(2), 65-80.
3.
Caldwell, L., & Workman, J. (2000). Apparel Spatial Visualization Test and Form Board Test [Abstract]. In ITAA Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.itaaonline.org/index2.html
4.
Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University.
5.
Ekstrom, R., French, J., Harman, H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
6.
Fredette, B. (1995). What is the relationship between artistic performance and visual proficiency? In D. G. Beauchamp, R. A. Braden, & R. E. Griffin (Eds.), Imagery and visual literacy: Selected readings from the annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (pp. 394-401). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED380099)
7.
Gaskill, L. (1992). Toward a model of retail product development: A case study analysis. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(4), 17-24.
8.
Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
9.
Humphreys, L., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 250-261.
10.
Kosslyn, S. (1981). The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory. Psychological Review, 88(1), 46-66.
11.
Kyllonen, P., Lohman, D., & Snow, R. (1984). Effects of aptitudes, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 130-145.
12.
Lajoie, S. (1986). Individual differences in spatial ability: A computerized tutor for orthographic projection tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California.
13.
Lamb, J., & Kallal, M. (1992). A conceptual framework for apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 42-47.
14.
Linn, M., & Petersen, A. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
15.
Lohman, D., Pellegrino, J., Alderton, D., & Regian, J. (1987). Dimensions and components of individual differences in spatial abilities. In S. Irvine & S. Newstead (Eds.), Intelligence and cognition: Contemporary frames of reference (pp. 253-312). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
16.
Lord, T. (1987). Spatial teaching. The Science Teacher, 54(2), 32-34.
17.
Mack, T. (1994). The effect of training in computeraided design on the spatial visualization ability of selected gifted adolescents. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 31(2), 28-43.
18.
McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities. New York: Praeger.
19.
Newcombe, N., Bandura, M., & Taylor, D. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9(3), 377-386.
20.
Orzada, B. T., & Kallal, M. J. (2001). Relationship of spatial visualization skills to style of processing preferences. In R. E. Griffin, V. S. Williams, & J. Lee (Eds.), Exploring the visual future: Art, design, science, & technology: Selected readings of the International Visual Literacy Association (pp. 363-367). Available from International Visual Literacy Association Web site: http://www.ivla.org
21.
Pike, G. (2001). Assessment measures. Assessment Update, 13(4), 14-15.
22.
Salthouse, T., Babcock, R.Mitchell, D., Palmon, R. & Skovronek, E. (1990). Sources of individual differences in spatial visualization ability. Intelligence, 14, 187-230.
23.
Salthouse, T., & Mitchell, D. (1990). Effects of age and naturally occurring experience on spatial visualization performance. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 845-854.
24.
Smith, M. (1964). Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. London: University of London Press.
25.
Tartre, L. (1990). Spatial skills, gender, and mathematics. In E. Fennema & G. C. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and gender (pp. 27-59). New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270.
27.
Workman, J., Caldwell, L., & Kallal, M. (1999). Development of a test to measure spatial abilities associated with apparel design and product development. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(3), 128-133.
28.
Workman, J., & Lee, S. (2004). A cross-cultural comparison of the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test and Paper Folding Test. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(1/2), 22-30.
29.
Workman, J., & Zhang, L. (1999). Relationship between general and apparel spatial visualization. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(4), 169-175.
