Three-dimensional body scanning technology was used to analyze fit of women's pants and to measure garment ease at various locations. Special test pants constructed with adjustable Velcro sections were used to provide custom fit for each study participant. Twenty-four subjects, ages 35 to 55, represented three body shape groups (straight, medium, curvy) determined by the hip-to-waist circumferences ratio, and four size groups covering Misses size range 4 to 16. Scans of a subject wearing minimal clothing and of the same subject wearing the test pant, adjusted by the researchers for best fit in a standing position, were compared. The differences between the pant and body scans (ease) were determined for circumference, slice area, surface area, and volume measurements at various locations and analyzed for size and shape dependence. Decrease in percent ease differences with increasing size was observed for several variables; no clear dependence on shape was found. Size dependences were used to propose a way of pattern grading with grade intervals variable by size and body location.
Air Force Research Laboratory. (2002). The Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR) Project. Retrieved June 5, 2003, from http://www.hec.afrl.af.mil/HECP/Card4.shtml.
2.
Ashdown, S., Loker, S., & Adelson, C. (2003). Use of body scan data to design sizing systems based on target markets (No. S01-CR01 National Textile Center). Retrieved December 10, 2004, from http://www.ntcresearch.org/pdf-rpts/AnRp03/S01-CR01-A3.pdf.
3.
Ashdown, S., Loker, S., Schoenfelder, K., & Lyman-Clarke, L. (2004). Using 3D scans for fit analysis. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management , 4(1). Retrieved March 1, 2005, from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue1/articles/Loker/Loker_full_103_04.pdf.
4.
ASTM International. (1995). Standard table of body measurements for female misses figure type, size 2-20 (D5585-95). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
5.
Brooks Brothers. (n.d.). Digital tailoring. Retrieved March, 1, 2005, from http://www.brooksbrothers.com/digitaltailor.tem.
6.
Brown, P., & Rice, J. (1998). Sizing and fit: The keys to competitive advantage . In Ready-to-wear apparel analysis (pp. 131-156). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
7.
Brunsman, M.A., Daanen, H.A.M., & Robinette, K.M. (1997, May). Optimal postures and positioning for human body scanning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Recent Advances in 3-D Digital Imaging , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
8.
Bye, E., & DeLong, M.R. (1994). A visual sensory evaluation of the results of two pattern grading methods. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(4), 1-7.
9.
C&A. (n.d.). A new dimension. Retrieved March, 1, 2005, from http://www.c-and-a.com/aboutUs/company/trend/ .
10.
Cauley, J., & Maehren, B. (Eds.). (1989). Sewing pants that fit. Minnetonka, MN: Cy DeCrosse.
11.
Connell, L.J., Ulrich, P., Knox, A., Hutton, G., Woronka, D., & Ashdown, S. (2003). Body scan analysis for fit models based on body shape and posture analysis. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://www.ntcresearch.org/pdf-rpts/AnRp03/S01-AC27-A3.pdf .
12.
Department of National Defence and Canadian Forces. (2002, November 19). BOSS XXI Body Scanning System. Retrieved March, 1, 2005, from http://www.forces.gc.ca/admmat/dglepm/badgesinsignia/body_scanning_e.htm .
13.
Erwin, M.D. (1949). Clothing for moderns. New York : Macmillan.
14.
InnovMetric Software Inc. (2002). PolyWorks v7.2 [Computer software]. Quebec, Canada: InnovMetric Software, Inc.
15.
Kang, T.J., & Kim, S.M. (2000). Optimized garment pattern generalization based on three-dimensional anthropometric measurement. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 12(4), 240-254.
16.
Kirk, W., & Ibrahim, S.M. (1966). Fundamental relationship of fabric extensibility to anthropometric requirements and garment performance. Textile Research Journal, January, 37-47.
17.
Koblyakova, E. B. (Ed.). (1974). Razmernaya tipologijya naseleniya stran - chlenov SEV (Typology of sizes of the population in the member countries of COMECON). Moskva , USSR: Legkaya industriya.
18.
Koblyakova, E. B. (Ed.). (1980). Osnovi konstruirovaniya odejdi (Basics of clothing construction). Moskva, USSR: Legkaya industriya.
19.
Leichty, E.G., Pottberg, D.N., & Rasband, J.A. (1992). Fitting and pattern alteration: A multi-method approach. New York: Fairchild Fashion & Merchandising Group.
20.
May-Plumlee, T., Eischen, J., & Bruner, D. (2004). 3D Virtual draping with fabric mechanics and body scan data (No. F02-NS08 National Textile Center). Retrieved January 15, 2005, from http://www.ntcresearch.org/pdf-rpts/AnRp04/F02-NS08-A4.pdf .
21.
Morton, L.A. (1999). Three dimensional full body scanning ready to make perfect fit. Dimensions, January/February, 1999. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from http://www.dla.mil/dimensions/janfeb99/3d.htm.
22.
Optitex. (n.d.). 3D runway. Retrieved March 10, 2006, from http://www.optitex.com/en/Products/3D_Runway .
23.
Paal, B. (1997). Creating efficient apparel sizing systems: An optimization approach. Unpublished Master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
24.
Petrova, A., Ashdown, S.P., Loker, S., & Schoenfelder, K. (2003, November). Anthropometric analysis of the seated body with respect to fit of apparel. Paper presented at the International Textile and Apparel Association , Savannah, GA.
25.
Salusso Deonier, C.J. (1983). A method for classifying adult female body form variation in relation to the U.S. standard for apparel sizing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
26.
Simmons, K., Istook, C.L., & Devarajan, P. (2004). Female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel. Part I: Describing female shapes. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 4(1). Retrieved January 25, 2005, from http://www.tx.ncsu.edu/jtatm/volume4issue1/articles/Istook/Istook_full_105_04.pdf.
27.
Textile Clothing Technology Corporation. (n.d.). 3D body measurement software system. Retrieved March 8, 2006 , from http://www.tc2.com/products/body_software.html .
28.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1970). Body measurements for the sizing of women's patterns and apparel (Voluntary Product Standard PS 42-70). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
29.
Vitronic. (n.d.). Complete body scanning. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from http://www.vitronic.de/en/bodyscannen/complete-body-scanning/#c194.
30.
Voellinger, J.G. (1998). Incorporating three-dimensional body scan data into apparel pattern development: Exploring a new methodology. Unpublished Master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
31.
Watkins, S. (1995). Clothing. The portable environment (2nd ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
32.
Winks, J.M. (1997). Clothing sizes. International standardization . Manchester, UK: The Textile Institute .
33.
Xu, B., Huang, Y., Yu, W., & Chen, T. (2002). Body scanning and modeling for custom fit garments. Journal ofTextile and Apparel, Technology and Management , 2(2), 1-11.
34.
Yu, W. (2004). Objective evaluation of clothing fit. In J. Fan, W. Yu & L. Hunter (Eds.), Clothing appearance and fit: Science and technology (pp. 72-88). Cambridge , UK: Woodland Publishing Limited.
