Controversial issues prevalent in today’s ready-to-wear apparel industry include the right of workers to join unions, the proliferation of sweatshops and sweatshop conditions, and design piracy. The idea of forming codes of conduct to establish criteria of ethical business practices is not new to the apparel industry. Indeed, the women’s dress manufacturing industry discussed and debated codes of fair competition under the New Deal Policies of the National Recovery Act (NRA) of 1933 to 1935. Primary sources for this study included governmental hearings in the establishment of the NRA Dress Code, The New York Times, Women’s Wear Daily, and the Journal of the Patent Office Society. The history of the NRA codes implemented in the U.S. women’s ready-to-wear apparel industry provides an important case study highlighting the difficulties and complexities of creating and achieving industry-wide standard practices through self-regulation. The failure of the NRA demonstrates that even with the joint cooperation of industry, labor, and consumer groups and the backing of the force of law, codes of fair competition proved impossible to enforce.
Amendment to code of fair competition for the dress manufacturing industry . (1934, October 31). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
Ballinger, J. ( 2009). Finding an anti-sweatshop strategy that works. Dissent, 56, 5-8.
3.
Barbash, J. ( 1968). The ILGWU as an organization in the age of Dubinsky. Labor History, 9, 98-115.
4.
Barber, B., & Lobel, L. ( 1952). Fashion in women’s clothes and the American social system. Social Forces, 31, 124-131.
5.
Brand, D.R. ( 1988). Corporatism and the rule of the law: A study of the National Recovery Administration. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.
Burns, L.D., & Bryant, N.O. ( 2002). The business of fashion. New York, NY: Fairchild.
7.
Business to fight for continued NRA. (1935, May 16). The New York Times, p. 42.
8.
Call, C.W. ( 1933, November 13). All factors cooperated in writing of dress code. Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2.
9.
Call, C.W. ( 1935a, May 31). Industry moves to erect trade practice fortifications . Women’s Wear Daily, p. 9.
10.
Call, C.W. ( 1935b, June 7). Speaking well of the dead applies to dress code rules. Women’s Wear Daily, p. 9.
11.
Cates, D. ( 1934). A current appraisal of the National Recovery Administration . Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 172, 130-138.
12.
Clark, J.M., Davis, W.H., Harrison, G.M., & Mead, G.H. ( 1937). The National Recovery Administration: Report of the president’s committee of industrial analysis. Washington, DC: Committee of Industrial Analysis.
13.
Code-making authority in NIRA void. (1935, May 27). Women’s Wear Daily, pp. 1, 19.
14.
Codes a bulwart against chiseling. (1935, May 17). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2.
15.
Codes to be heard affect 5,000,000. (1933, August 18). The New York Times, p. 2.
16.
Connery, R.H. ( 1938). The administration of an N.R.A. code. Chicago, IL: Public Administration Service.
17.
Crawford, M.D.C. ( 1933, October 19). ‘‘Big dad wolf ‘‘style piracy’’ has little to fear in apparel codes. ’’. Women’s Wear Daily, 1, 16.
18.
Darrow denounces extension of NRA. (1935, March 21). The New York Times, p. 9.
19.
Dearing, C.L., Homan, P.T., Lorwin, L., & Lyon, L.S. ( 1934). The abc of the NRA. Washington, DC : Brookings Institute.
20.
Drake, L., & Glaser, C. ( 1942). Trends in the New York clothing industry. New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration.
21.
Dress association move to regulate fair trade rules. (1935, June 6). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2. Dress code called bar to monopoly. (1933, July 21). The New York Times, p. 21.
22.
Dress code put forward as a ‘‘peace treaty.’’ ( 1933, August 23). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 9.
23.
Dress trade’s growth brings union problem. (1932, May 2). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 13.
24.
Dubinsky, D. ( 1933). Dubinsky says code will aid enforcement. Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2.
25.
Dubinsky, D., & Raskin, A.H. ( 1977). David Dubinsky: A life with labor. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
26.
Eisner, M. ( 1969). Politics, legislation, and the ILGWU. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 28, 301-314.
27.
Farrell-Beck, J., & Parsons, J. ( 2007). Twentieth century dress in the U.S. New York, NY: Fairchild.
28.
Fenning, K. ( 1934). N.R.A. codes. Journal of the Patent Office Society, 16, pp.189-203.
29.
Fight dress code rule. (1935, May 15). The New York Times, p. 39.
30.
First of bills to rehabilitate NRA is ready. ( 1935, May 31). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 13.
31.
Fitzpatrick, L. ( 2009, July 24). A brief history of the minimum wage. Time. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1912435,00.html
32.
Five hundred in city facing penalties of NRA. (1933, October 19). The New York Times, p. 1.
33.
For organization of dress industry. (1933, May 27). The New York Times, p. 26.
34.
Four thousand dressmakers sign. (1935, April 13). The New York Times, p. 28.
35.
Fraser, S. ( 1991). Labor will rule. New York, NY: The Free Press.
36.
Galambos, L. ( 1966). Competition and cooperation: The emergence of a national trade association. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
37.
Garment industry warned of strikes. (1935, May 28). The New York Times, p. 17.
38.
Garment leaders draft code today. (1933, July 5). The New York Times, p. 10.
39.
Garment workers vote for a strike. (1933, July 14). The New York Times, p. 10.
40.
General Johnson ends garment lockout. (1934, April 22). The New York Times, p. 28.
41.
Gill, W.A. ( 1935, July). Evidence study no. 9 of the dress manufacturing industry. Washington, DC: Office of National Recovery Administration.
42.
Greater code flexibility advocated. (1935, January 30). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 5.
43.
Hawley, E. ( 1966). The new deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Hearing on the code of fair practices and competition by the women’s dress manufacturing industry. (1933, August 23, November 25). Washington, DC: National Industrial Recovery Administration.
45.
Hearing on the dress manufacturing industry: Amendment proposal. ( 1934, December 13). Washington, DC: National Industrial Recovery Administration.
46.
Hearing on the dress manufacturing industry: Modification proposal. (1934, March 26). Washington, DC: National Industrial Recovery Administration.
47.
Howard explains. (1933, November 1). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 12.
48.
Industry moves to erect trade practice fortifications. (1935 , May 31). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 9.
49.
Industry must regulate self under the NRA. (1933, December 7). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2.
50.
Industries speed NRA substitutes. (1935, June 1). The New York Times, p. 8.
51.
Jacobs, M. ( 1999). Democracy’s third estate: New deal politics and the construction of a consuming public. International Labor and Working Class History, 55, 27-51.
52.
Johnson aide asks speeding of codes. (1933, June 29). The New York Times, p. 8.
53.
Johnson, H. ( 1935). The blue eagle from egg to earth. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
54.
Johnson says recovery rests with the industry. (1933, June 25). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 1.
55.
Justices Cardozo and Stone stress codes assume too wide a scope. ( 1935, May 28). Women’s Wear Daily, pp. 10, 26.
56.
Kolchin, M. ( 1933, November 13). Says trading down justifies code. Women’s Wear Daily, p. 12.
57.
Kunz, G.I., & Garner, M.B. ( 2007). Going global. New York, NY: Fairchild.
58.
Labor label drive for nation opened. (1935, November 19). The New York Times, p. 41.
59.
Larson, S. ( 1963). Union impact on price in the dress industry (Unpublished master’s thesis). City College, New York.
60.
Lasher, A.W. ( 1933, November 13). National Dress Manufacturers’ Association views code as declaration of independence from unfair competition. Women’s Wear Daily, p. 1.
61.
Leach, W. ( 1993). Land of desire: Merchants, power, and the rise of a new American culture. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
62.
Leveling of inequalities is predicted. (1933, November 13). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 10.
63.
Littrell, M.A., & Dickson, M.A. ( 1999). Social responsibility in the global market: Fair trade of cultural products. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
64.
Lyon, L.S., Homan, P.T., Lorwin, L.L., Terborgh, G., Dearing, C., & Marshall, L.C. (1935). The National Recovery Administration . Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
65.
Marcketti, S.B., & Parsons, J.L. ( 2006). Design piracy and self regulation: The Fashion Originators’ Guild of America: 1932-1941. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 214-228.
66.
McKellar, S. ( 2002). Seals of approval: Consumer representation in 1930s’ America. Journal of Design History, 15, 1-14.
67.
Meiklejohn, H.E. ( 1938). Dresses. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
68.
Miss Perkins sews first NRA label. (1934, January 23). The New York Times, p. 20. National recovery code assessments. (1935). The Yale Law Journal, 44, 849-868.
69.
NRA begins to get voluntary trade codes. (1935, June 18). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2.
70.
NRA remnants in commerce, labor depts. (1935, December 24). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2.
71.
Parmet, D.P. ( 2005). The master of Seventh Avenue: David Dubinsky and the American labor movement. New York: New York University Press.
72.
Peace parleys on in dress lockout. (1934, April 21). The New York Times, p. 11.
73.
Plan organization of dress industry. (1933, June 20). The New York Times, p. 35.
74.
Popular price group to gird against curbs. (1935, March 15). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 1.
75.
Questions and answers on present NRA status. (1935, May 28). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 5.
76.
Reemployment drive insignia made known. (1933, July 25). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 1.
77.
Rentner, M. ( 1933). Curb on unfair practices will aid artistry. Women’s Wear Daily, p. 6.
78.
Rentner urges exemption of designers. (1933, December 15). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 11.
79.
Richards, F.S. ( 1951). The ready-to-wear industry 1900-1950. New York, NY: Fairchild.
80.
Richberg would extend NRA 2 years. (1935, March 7). Women’s Wear Daily, pp. 1, 2.
81.
Romasco, A.U. ( 1983). The politics of recovery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
82.
Roosevelt gets cloak code in 10 days. (1933, July 21). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 1.
83.
Says lack of records makes big dress code handicap. (1935, February 1). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 15. Says NRA realized ideals. (1934, September 22). The New York Times, p. 16.
84.
Seventy strikers seized at a 5th Av. Hotel (1933, October 8). The New York Times, p. 26.
85.
Sixty thousand quit today in garment shops. (1933, August 16). The New York Times, p. 3.
86.
Stolberg, B. ( 1944). Tailor’s progress: The story of a famous union and the men who made it. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
87.
Strikes are voted in garment trades. (1933, July 12). The New York Times, p. 8.
88.
Tan, C.L. ( 2007, October 27). Copy protection for fall fashion. The Wall Street Journal, W1.
89.
Taylor, N. ( 2008). American-made, the enduring legacy of the WPA: When FDR put the nation to work. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
90.
Tepere, L. ( 1937). The woman’s garment industry, an economic analysis . New York, NY: Educational Department of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union.
91.
Text of code for dress manufacturing industry as approved by the president . (1933, November 1). Women’s Wear Daily , p. 12.
92.
Text of Percy S. Straus’s warning on codes. (1933, July 21). The New York Times, p. 8.
93.
The National Dress Manufacturers’ Association. (1935, May 29). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 15. The New York Times. (1935 February 21). p. 2.
94.
To seek clothing code (1933, June 8). The New York Times, p. 37.
95.
Trowbridge, S. ( 1936, March). Some aspects of the women’s apparel industry . Washington, DC: Office of National Recovery Administration.
96.
Ulrich, P.V. ( 1995). ‘‘Look for the label’’-The International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union label campaign, 1959-1975. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 49-56.
97.
Unions seek Wal-Mart probe over election law. (2008, April 14). The Washington Post, p. A3.
98.
Urges aid to young designer. (1933, October 12). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 2.
99.
Vance, C.M., & Paik, Y. ( 2006). Managing a global workforce. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
100.
Voluntary NRA or change considered. (1935, May 29). Women’s Wear Daily, pp. 1, 26.
101.
Whalen reports strikes abating (1933, October 6). The New York Times, p. 26.
102.
Wilson, W. ( 1962). How the chamber of commerce viewed the NRA: A re-examination . Mid America, 42, 95-108.
103.
Wolfe, J.H., & Dickson, M. ( 2002). Apparel manufacturer and retailer efforts to reduce child labor: An ethics of virtue perspective on codes of conduct. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 20, 183-195.
104.
Wolman, L. ( 1935). Wages and hour under the codes of fair competition. National Bureau of Economic Research, 54, 1-9.
105.
Zahn, P. ( 1933, November 13). Code held dawn of new era. Women’s Wear Daily, p. 6.
106.
Zahn predicts more efforts on promotion. (1933 November 13). Women’s Wear Daily, p. 12.
107.
Zelomek, A.W. ( 1935, June 7). Apprehension over NRA. Women’s Wear Daily, p, 11.
