Research and Theory Trends in Historic Dress and Textiles Research

Abstract

Historic dress and textiles (HDT) has been a prominent research subject during the 20^th century but has not been examined via a focused journal analysis. Thus, HDT research and theory trends were explored by analyzing 306 articles published in Clothing and Textiles Research Journal (CTRJ) from 1982-2006 and Dress from 1975-2006. A content analysis approach was adopted to examine the following: quantity of HDT articles, single-multiple authorship, author affiliation, funding sources, research topic (including geography and time period), research method, and use of theory. The topics studied most often in CTRJ were apparel construction/production and research issues (19.5% each), and in Dress, social/psychological aspects of dress (18.3%). Most research articles (87.0%) used qualitative data to address research questions. The most frequently used research method in both journals was the social/cultural history-based approach. The majority of research articles (86%) did not articulate a specific or “named” theory. The findings yield valuable insights into the body of HDT research published within two key journals of the clothing and textiles field, including areas of strength related to topics of study and the suggestion that an open dialogue regarding theory development be continued.

Keywords

historic dress historic textiles CTRJ dress research trends journal analysis theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arthur

L. B.

(1997). Cultural authentication refined: The case of the Hawaiian holoku. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15, 129–139.

Baumgarten

(1996). Dressing for pregnancy: A maternity gown of 1780–1795. Dress, 23, 16–24.

Bornat

(1998). Oral history as a social movement: Reminiscence and older people. In Perks

Thomson

(Eds.), The oral history reader (pp. 189–205). London, England: Routledge.

Chowdhary

Meacham

(1983–1984). Changing focus of clothing and textiles within home economics: An analysis of two professional journals. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 2, 15–18.

Costume Society of America. (2004). Dress. Retrieved from http://www.costumesocietyamerica.com/dress.htm

Costume Society of America. (2006). CSA membership directory. Minster, OH: Post.

Cunningham

(1981). The theoretical bases of William Hogarth’s depiction of dress. Dress, 7, 52–68.

Cunningham

(1984). Eighteenth century nightgowns: The gentleman’s robe in art and fashion. Dress, 10, 2–11.

Damhorst

M. L.

(1991). Relation of clothing and textiles research to scientific inquiry in social cognition. In Kaiser

S. B.

Damhorst

M. L.

(Eds.), Critical linkages in clothing and textiles subject matter: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 191–202). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.

10.

Eicher

J. B.

Erekosima

T. V.

(1980). Distinguishing non-western from western dress: The concept of cultural authentication [Abstract]. In Tortora

(Chair) (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1980 national meeting of the Association of College Professors of Clothing and Textiles (pp. 83–84). Burke, VA: Association of College Professors of Clothing and Textiles.

11.

Farrell-Beck

(1998). Distinguished scholar lecture. Research in history: A humanities approach to inquiry. In Owens

N. J.

(Ed.), Proceedings from the Fifty-fifth Annual Conference of the International Textile and Apparel Association (pp. 4–8). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.

12.

Farrell-Beck

Haviland

Harding

(1986). Sewing techniques in women’s outerwear, 1800-1869. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 4, 20–29.

13.

Gunn

(1991). A case for the historical method in clothing and textiles research. In Kaiser

S. B.

Damhorst

M. L.

(Eds.), Critical linkages in clothing and textiles subject matter: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 139–149). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.

14.

Hillestad

(1980). The underlying structure of appearance. Dress, 6, 117–125.

15.

Hogarth

(1997). The analysis of beauty. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1753).

16.

Holsti

O. R.

(1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and the humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

17.

Hutton

S. S.

(1984). State of the art: Clothing as a form of human behavior. Home Economics Research Journal, 12, 340–353.

18.

Hutton

S. S.

(1991). Concept clarification in textiles and clothing: A continuing agenda. In Kaiser

S. B.

Damhorst

M. L.

(Eds.), Critical linkages in clothing and textiles subject matter: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 49–54). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.

19.

International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. (n.d.). Studies in Conservation. Retrieved from http://www.iiconservation.org/publications/sic/sic.php

20.

Johnson

K. K. P.

Yoo

J. J.

Kim

Lennon

S. J.

(2008). Dress and human behavior: A review and critique. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 26, 3–22.

21.

Kaiser

S. B.

Nagasawa

R. H.

Hutton

S. S.

(1995). Construction of an SI theory of fashion: Part I. Ambivalence and change. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 172–183.

22.

Kang

B. W.

(2009). Research and theory trends in clothing and textiles, 2000-2007 (Unpublished master’s thesis). Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

23.

Lennon

S. J.

Burns

L. D.

(2000). Diversity of research in textiles, clothing, and human behavior: The relationship between what we know and how we know. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18, 213–226.

24.

Lennon

S. J.

Johnson

K. P.

Park

J. H.

(2001). Research trends in clothing and textiles: An analysis of three journals, 1980-1999. Family and Consumer Science Research Journal, 30, 117–139.

25.

Oliver

Mahoney

(1991). The Clothing and Textiles Research Journal: An empirical examination. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9, 22–27.

26.

Paoletti

J. B.

(1982). Content analysis: Its application to the study of the history of costume. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 1, 14–17.

27.

Paoletti

J. B.

(1984). Does the costume and textile historian have a place in the future? Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 2, 33–36.

28.

Pedersen

E. L.

(2007). Theory is everywhere: A discourse on theory. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 25, 106–128.

29.

Pedersen

E. L.

Buckland

S. S.

Bates

(2008–2009). Theory and dress scholarship: A discussion on developing and applying theory. Dress, 35, 71–85.

30.

Prown

J. D.

(1982). Mind in matter: An introduction to material culture theory and method. Winterthur Portfolio, 17, 1–19.

31.

Richards

(1983). The rise and fall of it all: The hemlines and hiplines of the 1920s. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 2, 42–48.

32.

Sage Publications Online. (2006). Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. Retrieved from http://ctr.sagepub.com/

33.

Sibley

L. R.

Jakes

K. A.

(1989). Etowah textile remains and cultural context: A model for inference. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7, 37–45.

34.

Simmel

(1904). Fashion. International Quarterly, 10, 130–150.

35.

Skjelver

M. R.

(1971). The historical method for research in home economics. Journal of Home Economics, 63, 107–112.

36.

Taylor

(2002). The study of dress history. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.

37.

Turnbaugh

S. P.

(1979). The seriation of fashion. Home Economics Research Journal, 7, 241–248.

38.

Victoria and Albert Museum. (n.d.). Conservation Journal Online. Retrieved from http://www.vam.ac.uk/res_cons/conservation/journal/

39.

Wray

K. B.

(2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69, 150–168.