This paper proposes an interdisciplinary, conceptual framework for the study of clothing behavior, based upon a synthesis of major concepts from cognitive social psychology and symbolic interactionism. Cognitive theorists regard clothes as cues that may be selected by perceivers to understand observed persons. A symbolic interactionist approach places more emphasis on the role of dress in social communication, with consideration for both wearers' and perceivers' viewpoints. The two conceptual approaches are not mutually exclusive, and they share common concerns for perceivers' evaluations of other persons and situations. A contextual social-psychological study of clothing would allow researchers, using multi-methodological approaches, to test hypotheses that consider social and cognitive dimensions of dress in interpersonal situations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R.P.; Aronson, E.; McGuire, W.J.; Newcomb, T.M.; Rosenberg, M.J.; and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1968). Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally .
2.
Arkin, R.M., and Duval, S. (1975). Focus of attention and causal attributions of actors and observers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 11, 427-438.
3.
Ashmore, R.D., and DelBoca, F.K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping . In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior (pp. 1-35). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method . Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
5.
Conner, B.H.; Peters, K.; and Nagasawa, R.H. (1975). Person and costume: Effects on the formation of first impressions. Home Economics Research Journal, 4, 32-41.
6.
Creekmore, A.M. (1963). Clothing behaviors and their relation to general values and basic needs. (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, No. 63-6292.
7.
Creekmore, A.M. (1971). Methods of Measuring Clothing Variables. East Lansing: Michigan State University .
8.
Eiser, J.R. (1980). Cognitive Social Psychology. London: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
10.
Forsyth, D.R. (1980). The functions of attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 184-189.
11.
Giles, H., and Chavasse, W. (1975). Communication length as a function of dress style and social status. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 961-962.
12.
Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. (1964). Awareness contexts and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 29, 669-679.
13.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public. New York : Harper & Row.
14.
Gordon, L.V. (1975). The Measurement of Interpersonal Values. Chicago: Science Research Assoc., Inc.
15.
Greenberg, M.S.; Saxe, L.; and Bar-Tal, D. (1978). Perceived stability of trait labels. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 59-62.
16.
Gurel, L.M., and Deemer, E.M. (1975). Construct validity of Creekmore's clothing questionnaire . Home Economics Research Journal, 4, 42-47.
17.
Gurel, L.M., and Gurel, L. (1979). Clothing interest: Conceptualization and measurement . Home Economics Research Journal, 7, 274-282.
18.
Hamid, P.N. (1968). Style of dress as a perceptual cue in impression formation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 904-906.
19.
Hamid, P.N. (1972). Some effects of dress cues on observational accuracy, a perceptual estimate, and impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 279-289.
20.
Hamilton, D.L. (1981). Stereotyping and intergroup behavior: Some thoughts on the cognitive approach. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior (pp. 83-114). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
21.
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
Horn, M.J., and Gurel, L.M. (1981). The Second Skin: An Interdisciplinary Study of Clothing. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, Co.
23.
House, J.S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40, 161-177.
24.
Johnson, B.H.; Nagasawa, R.H.; and Peters, K. (1977). Clothing style differences: Their effect on the impression of sociability. Home Economics Research Journal , 6, 58-63.
25.
Jones, E.E., and Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
26.
Jones, E.E., and Nisbett, R.E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones , D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior . New York: General Learning Press .
27.
Kaigler-Evans, K., and Damhorst, M.L. (1978). Impression formation: Use of descriptors of personal traits. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 903-906.
28.
Kelley, H.H., and Michela, J.L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review ofPsychology, 31, 457-501.
29.
Kerr, B.A., and Dell, D.M. (1976). Perceived interviewer expertness and attractiveness: Effects of interviewer behavior and attire and interview setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 553-556.
30.
Knox, L.A., and Mancuso, J.C. (1981). Incongruities in self-presentations and judgments about people. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 843-852.
31.
Lapitsky, M., and Smith, C.M. (1981). Impact of clothing on impressions of personal characteristics and writing ability. Home Economics Research Journal, 9, 327-335.
32.
Lewis, J.D. (1981). G. H. Mead's contact theory of reality: The manipulatory phase of the act in the constitution of mundane, scientific, aesthetic, and evaluative objects. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 129-141.
33.
Livesley, W.J., and Bromley, D.B. (1973). Person Perception in Childhood and Adolescence . London: John Wiley & Sons .
34.
Manz, W., and Lueck, H.E. (1968). Influence of wearing glasses on personality ratings: Cross-cultural validation of an old experiment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 27, 704.
35.
McArthur, L.Z., and Post, D.L. (1977). Figural emphasis and person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 520-535.
36.
McCall, G. (1976). Communication and negotiated identity. Communication, 2, 173-184.
37.
McCall, G.J., and Simmons, J.L. (1966). Identities and Interactions. New York: Free Press.
38.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
39.
Miller, D.L. (1981). The meaning of role-taking. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 167-175.
40.
Morrione, T.J., and Farberman, H.A. (1981a). Conversation with Herbert Blumer: I. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 113-128.
41.
Morrione, T.J., and Farberman, H.A. (1981b). Conversation with Herbert Blumer: II. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 273-295.
42.
Nisbett, R.E.; Caputo, C.; Legant, P.; and Marecek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154-164.
43.
Perry, M.O.; Schutz, H.G.; and Rucker, M.H. (1983). Clothing interest, self-actualization, and demographic variables. Home Economics Research Journal, 11, 280-288.
44.
Pettigrew, T.F. (1981). Extending the stereotype concept. In D.L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior (pp. 303-331). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
45.
Pryor, J.B., and Kriss, M. (1977). The cognitive dynamics of salience in the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 49-55.
46.
Quin, C.O.; Robinson, I.E.; and Balkwell, J.W. (1980). A synthesis of two social psychologies. Symbolic Interaction, 3, 59-88.
47.
Rosenfeld, L.B., and Plax, T.G. (1977). Clothing as communication. Journal of Communication, 27, 24-31.
48.
Rucker, M.H.; Harrison, A.; and Vanderlip, N. (1982). Personalization of cover letters in mail surveys: The effects of similarity and consistency of cues on response rates. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association , Sacramento, Calif.
Sharma, R.S. (1980). Clothing behavior, personality, and values: A correlational study. Psychological Studies, 25, 137-142.
51.
Sherohman, J. (1977). Conceptual and methodological issues in the study of role-taking accuracy. Symbolic Interaction, 1, 121-131.
52.
Snyder, M.L.; Stephen, W.G.; and Rosenfeld, D. (1976). Egotism and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 435-441.
53.
Solomon, S. (1978). Measuring dispositional and situational attributions . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 589-594.
54.
Stewart, R.L. (1981). What George Mead should have said: Exploration of a problem of interpretation. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 157-166.
55.
Stone, G. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. Rose (Ed.), Human Behavior and Social Processes . Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
56.
Stone, G.P. (1977). Personal acts. Symbolic Interaction , 1, 2-19.
57.
Straus, R.A. (1981). The theoretical frame of symbolic interactionism: A contextualist, social science. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 261-272.
58.
Stryker, S. (1977). Developments in two social psychologies: Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 2, 145-160.
59.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version . Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings .
60.
Tagiuri, R. (1969). Person perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
61.
Taylor, S. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc .
62.
Thomas, W.I. (1923). The Unadjusted Girl. Boston : Little, Brown & Co.
63.
Wegner, D.M., and Vallacher, R.R. (1977). Implicit Psychology: An Introduction to Social Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
