Eight nonwoven fabrics were made into experimental protective pants and worn into two types of low crop fields. Barrier properties (water penetration resistance, oil repellency, and air permeability) were measured for control fabrics and fabrics taken from pants worn in the field Results indicate that while loss of breaking strenth due to abrasion was minimal, effects of field wear on barrier properties were significant. Water penetration resistance and oil repellency were reduced and air permeability was increased for most specimens after wear in at least one of the fields. Fluorochemical finishes used on three of the fabrics were less effective after wear. The study suggests that performance of protective clothing may not be adequately assessed by testing fabrics prior to wear.
American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC). (1988). Technical Manual of the AATCC. Research Triangle Park, NC: Author.
2.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1988). 1988 Annual Book of ASTM Standards (Vol. 07.01). Eaton, MD: Author.
3.
Batista. G.C., Stamper, H.H., Nigg, H.N., & Knapp, J.L. (1985). Dislodgeable residues of carbophenothion in Florida citrus: Implications for safe worker reentry. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 35, 213-221.
4.
Cloud, R.M., Boethel, D.J., & Buco, S.M. (1988). Protective clothing for crop consultants: Field studies in Louisiana. In S. Z. Mandorf, R. Sager, & A. P. Nielsen (Eds.), Performance of Protective Clothing ASTM STP 989 (pp. 597-604). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials .
5.
Finley, E.L., Graves, J.B., Summers, T.A., Schilling, P.E., & Morris, H.F. (June, 1977). Some Facts about Methyl Parathion Contamination of Clothing in Cotton Fields and its Removal by Home Laundering (Circular No. 104). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
6.
Finley, E.L. & Rogillio, J.R.B. (1969). DDT and methyl parathion residues found in cotton and cotton-polyester fabrics worn in cotton fields . Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology , 12, 268-274.
7.
Hackathorn, D.R., & Eberhart, D.C. (1985). Data-base proposal for use in predicting mixer-loader-applicator exposure. In R. Honeycutt, G. Zweig, & N. Ragsdale (Eds.), Dermal Exposure Related To Pesticide Use ACS #273 (pp. 341-355). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
8.
Hobbs, N.E., Oakland, B.G., & Hurwitz, M.D. (1986). Effects of barrier finishes on aerosol spray penetration and comfort of woven and disposable nonwoven fabrics for protective clothing . In R. L. Barker & G. C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance of Protective Clothing ASTM STP 900 (pp. 151-161). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
9.
Honeycutt, R., Zweig, G., & Ragsdale, N. (1985). (Eds.), Dermal Exposure Related To Pesticide Use ACS # 273. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
10.
Leonas, K.K. & DeJonge, J.O. (1986). Effect of functional finish barriers on pesticide penetration. In R. L. Barker & G. C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance of Protective Clothing ASTM STP 900 (pp. 177-186). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
11.
Leonas, K.K., Easter, E. & DeJonge, J.O. (1989). Effect of fabric characteristics on pesticide penetration through selected apparel fabrics. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 43, 231-238.
12.
Nielsen, A.P. & Moraski, R.V. (1986). Protective clothing and the agricultural worker . In R. L. Barker & G. C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance of Protective Clothing ASTM STP #900 (pp. 95-102). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
13.
Nigg, H.N., Stamper, J.H., & Queen, R.M. (1984). The development and use of a universal model to predict tree crop harvester pesticide exposure. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 45, 182-186.
14.
Nuessle, A.C. (1971). Soil and stain resistance. In Mark, Wooding, & Atlas (Eds.), Chemical Aftertreatment of Textiles (pp. 465-505). New York: Wiley Interscience.
15.
Orlando, J., Branson, D., Ayres, G., & Leavitt, R. (1981). The penetration of formulated guthion spray through selected fabrics. Journal of Environmental Science and Health , B16(5), 617-628.
16.
Siewierski, M. (Ed.), (1984). Determination and Assessment of Pesticide Exposure. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
17.
Tordoir, W. F. & van Heemstra-Lequin, E. A. H. (Eds.) (1980). Field Worker Exposure During Pesticide Application. New York : Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
18.
Wadsworth, L.C., Easter, E.P. & Lin, Y.Q. (1988). A study of nonwoven fabrics in providing repellency and barrier performance. Symposium Proceedings: The First International Symposium on the Impact of Pesticides, Industrial and Consumer Chemicals on the Near Environment (pp. 137-153).
19.
Waldron, A.C. (1985). Minimizing pesticide exposure risk for the mixer-loader, applicator, and field worker. In R. Honeycutt , G. Zweig, and N. Ragsdale (Eds.). Dermal Exposure Related To Pesticide Use ACS #273 (pp. 413-425).
20.
Wolfe, H.R., Durham, W.F., & Armstrong, J.F. (1967). Exposure of workers to pesticides. Archives of Environmental Health, 14, 622-633.
