Evaluation of Functional Fit of Chemical Protective Gloves for Agricultural Workers

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional fit of commercially available protective gloves recommended to agricultural workers and to investigate the effect of polymer type, thickness of glove materials, and glove shape on such fit. The study was conducted in two parts. First the hand dimensions of the user population were estimated by conducting an anthropometric survey of 380 agricultural workers. This was followed by a fit evaluation of four test gloves by 38 farmers whose hand dimensions were representative of the user population. Fit was assessed by subjective evaluations of 15 specific hand dimensions for each glove and by conducting two standardized dexterity tests with participants bare-handed and wearing each of the four gloves.

Significant differences in fit were found among gloves differing in polymer type, thickness and shape. Thinner gloves made from flexible polymers gave the most acceptable fit. Major design and sizing problems were identified for each of the four gloves. Gloves that fit snugly and enabled participants to complete dexterity tests at a rate comparable to bare hands received the highest subjective fit ratings. To enable agricultural workers to achieve optimum performance while completing fine manipulative tasks, the fit of gloves, especially in the fingers, must be improved.

Keywords

dexterity chemical protective gloves pesticides functional fit

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott, I. (1984). Spray operator safety study. London: British Agrochemicals Association.

Bonsall, J.L. (1985). Measurement of occupational exposure to pesticides . In G. J. Turnbull , D. M. Sanderson & J. L. Bonsall (Eds.), Occupational hazards of pesticide use (pp. 51-66). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc.

Bradley, J.V. (1969a). Effects of gloves on control manipulation time . Human Factors, 11, 13-20.

Bradley, J.V. (1969b). Glove characteristics influencing control manipulability . Human Factors, 11, 21-36.

Courtney, A.J. (1984). Hand anthropometry of Hong Kong Chinese females compared to other ethnic groups. Ergonomics, 27, 1169-1180.

Davies, B.T. , Abada, A. , Benson, K. , Courtney, A. , & Minto, I. (1980). A comparison of hand anthropometry of females in three ethnic groups. Ergonomics, 23, 179-182.

Davis, J.E. , Stevens, E.R. , & Staiff, D.C. (1983). Potential exposure of apple thinners to azinphosmethyl and comparison of two methods for assessment of hand exposure. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 31, 631-638.

Denton, M.J. (1971). Fit, stretch, and comfort. In Textiles for Comfort, Third Shirley International Seminar, Manchester, England.

Garrett, J.W. (1971). The adult human hand: Some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations. Human Factors, 13, 117-131.

10.

Groth, H. , & Lyman, J. (1958). Effects of surface friction on skilled performance with bare and gloved hands. Journal of Applied Psychology , 42, 273-277.

11.

Lyman, J. (1957). The effects of equipment design on manual performance . In F. R. Fisher (Ed.), Protection and functioning of the hand, (pp. 86-102). Washington: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.

12.

Maibach, H.I. , Feldman, R. , Milby, T.H. , & Serat, W.F. (1971). Regional variation in percutaneous penetration in man. Archives of Contamination and Toxicology, 23, 208-211.

13.

McConville, J.T. (1986). Anthropometric fit testing and evaluation. In R. L. Barker & G. C. Coletta (Eds.). Performance of Protective Clothing , ASTM STP 900, (pp. 51-58). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

14.

Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Tests examiner's manual (1969 ). California: American Guidance Service, Inc.

15.

Moraski, R.V. , & Nielsen, A.P. (1985). Protective clothing and its significance to the pesticide user. In R. C. Honeycutt , G. Zweig , & N. N. Ragsdale (Eds.), Dermal exposure related to pesticide use: Discussion of risk assessment (pp. 429-444). Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.

16.

Nelson, G.O. , Jum, B.Y. , Carlson, G.J. , Wong, C.M. , & Johnson, J.S. (1981). Glove permeation by organic solvents. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 42, 217-225.

17.

Orlando, J.Y. (1979). Objectifying apparel design. Proceedings of the Association of College Professors of Textiles and Clothing, Western Region Annual Conference (pp. 127-132). Denver, Colorado .

18.

Pheasant, S. (1986). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and design . Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis .

19.

Robinette, K.M. (1986). Anthropometric methods for improving protection . In R. L. Barker & G. C. Coletta (Eds.). Performance of Protective Clothing, ASTM STP 900 (pp. 569-580). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

20.

Roebuck, J.A. , Kroemer, K.H.E. , & Thomson, W.G. (1975). Engineering anthropometry methods. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.

21.

Rucker, M. , Heffner, C. , & York, K. (1988). Protective gloves for agricultural application of pesticides: A needs assessment. In B. M. Reagan, D. Johnson & S. Dusaj (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Symposium on the Impact of Pesticides, Industrial and Consumer Chemicals on the Near Environment (pp. 255-256). Manhattan: Kansas State University.

22.

Sheridan, T.B. (1954). An experimental study of physical criteria for evaluating handcovering designs. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California.

23.

Sokal, R.R. , & Rohlf, F.J. (1981). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research (2nd ed.). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.

24.

Tremblay, J.F. (1989). Evaluation of functional fit and comfort of chemical protective gloves for agricultural workers. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Alberta: Edmonton.

25.

Tremblay, J.F. , Rigakis, K.B. , & Crown, E.M. (1992). Anthropometric analysis of fit problems in chemical protective gloves. In J. P. McBriarty & N.W. Henry (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing: Fourth volume, ASTM STP 1133 (pp. 634-650). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

26.

Tremblay-Lutter, J.F. , & Weihrer, S.J. (in press). Functional fit evaluation to determine optimal ease requirements in chemical protective gloves. In J. S. Johnson & S. Z. Mandorf (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing: Fifth volume, ASTM STP 1237. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

27.

Van Cott, H.P. (1972). Human engineering tests and evaluation. In H. P. Van Cott & R. G. Kinkade (Eds.). Human engineering guide to equipment design (pp. 701-728). Washington, D.C.: McGraw-Hill Co.

28.

Van Schoor, H. (1989). The design and evaluation of disposable protective coveralls for pesticide applicators in agriculture. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Alberta: Edmonton .

29.

Watkins, S.M. (1984). Clothing: The portable environment. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.