In Furman v. Georgia, Justice Marshall hypothesized that informed individuals would not support the death penalty. To test this hypothesis, survey results from 730 students at a Michigan university were used. Students read one of three essays; one focusing on death penalty deterrence research, another on the chances of sentencing an innocent person to death, and the third on the general reasons for punishing offenders (i.e., the control essay). The innocence essay resulted in a small but statistically significant reduction of support. There was no statistically significant reduction in support for the death penalty among the deterrence and control essay groups. The findings are discussed and recommendations for future research are made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amsterdam, A. -1982-. Capital punishment. In H. Bedau -Ed.-, The death penalty in America -3rd ed., pp. 346-358-. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Archer, D., Gartner, R., & Beittel, M. -1983-. Homicide and the death penalty: A cross-national test of the deterrence hypothesis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 991-1013.
3.
Bailey, W. -1974-. Murder and the death penalty. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 65, 416-423.
4.
Bailey, W. -1977-. Imprisonment v. the death penalty as a deterrent to murder. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 239-260.
5.
Bailey, W. -1978a-. An analysis of the deterrent effect of the death penalty in North Carolina. North Carolina Central Law Review, 10, 29-52.
6.
Bailey, W. -1978b-. Deterrence and the death penalty for murders in Utah: A time series analysis. Journal of Contemporary Law, 5, 1-20.
7.
Bailey, W. -1979a-. Deterrence and the death penalty for murder in Oregon. Willamette Law Review, 16, 67-85.
8.
Bailey, W. -1979b-. The deterrent effect of the death penalty for murder in California. Southern California Law Review, 52, 743-764.
9.
Bailey, W. -1979c-. The deterrent effect of the death penalty for murder in Ohio: A time series analysis. Cleveland State Law Review, 28, 51-81.
10.
Bailey, W. -1980-. Deterrence and the celerity of the death penalty: A neglected question in deterrence research. Social Forces, 58, 1308-1331.
11.
Bailey, W. -1983-. Disaggregation in deterrence and death penalty research: The case of murder in Chicago. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 827-858.
12.
Bailey, W. -1990-. Murder, capital punishment, and television: Execution publicity and homicide rates. American Sociological Review, 55, 628-633.
13.
Bailey, W. -1991-. Punishment and deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
Bailey, W., & Peterson, R. -1989-. Murder and capital punishment: A monthly time series analysis of execution publicity. American Sociological Review, 54, 722-743.
15.
Bohm, R. -1987-. American death penalty attitudes: A critical examination of recent evidence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 380-396.
16.
Bohm, R. -1989-. The effects of classroom instruction and discussion on death penalty opinions: A teaching note. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 123-131.
17.
Bohm, R. -1998-. American death penalty opinion: Past, present, and future. In J. Acker, R. Bohm, & C. Lanier -Eds.-, America's experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction -pp. 25-46-. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
18.
Bohm, R. -1999-. Deathquest: An introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
19.
Bohm, R., Clark, L., & Aveni, A. -1990-. The influence of knowledge for death penalty opinions: An experimental test. Justice Quarterly, 7, 175-188.
20.
Bohm, R., Clark, L., & Aveni, A. -1991-. Knowledge and death penalty opinion: A test of the Marshall hypotheses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 360-387.
21.
Bohm, R., Vogel, R., & Maisto, A. -1993-. Knowledge and death penalty opinion: A panel study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 29-45.
22.
Bowers, W. -1984-. Legal homicides: Death as punishment in America, 1864-1982. Boston: Northwestern University Press.
23.
Bowers, W., & Pierce, G. -1980-. Deterrence or brutalization: What is the effect of executions? Crime and Delinquency, 26, 453-459.
24.
Clarke, A., & Lambert, E. -2000-. Executing the innocent: The next step in the Marshall hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
Decker, S., & Kohfeld, C. -1984-. A deterrence study of the death penalty in Illinois, 1933-1980. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 367-377.
26.
Decker, S., & Kohfeld, C. -1986-. The deterrent effect of capital punishment in Florida: A time series analysis. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 1, 422-437.
27.
Decker, S., & Kohfeld, C. -1987-. An empirical analysis of the effect of the death penalty in Missouri. Journal of Crime and Justice, 10, 23-46.
28.
Decker, S., & Kohfeld, C. -1988-. Capital punishment and executions in the Lone Star State: A deterrence study. Criminal Justice Research Bulletin, 3, 1-6.
29.
Decker, S., & Kohfeld, C. -1990-. The deterrent effect of capital punishment in the five most active execution states: A time series analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 15, 173-191.
30.
Durham, A., Elrod, H., & Kinkade, P. -1996-. Public support for the death penalty: Beyond Gallup. Justice Quarterly, 13, 705-736.
31.
Ellsworth, P., & Gross, S. -1994-. Hardening of the attitudes: Americans' views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-52.
32.
Ellsworth, P., & Ross, L. -1983-. Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 116-169.
33.
Firment, K., & Geiselman, E. -1997-. University students' attitudes and perceptions of the death penalty. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 15, 65-89.
34.
Fox, J., Radelet, M., & Bonsteel, J. -1991-. Death penalty opinion in the post-Furman years. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 28, 499-528.
35.
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 -1972-.
36.
Green, S., Salkind, N., & Akey, T. -1997-. Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
Gross, S. -1996-. The risks of death: Why erroneous convictions are common in capital cases. Buffalo Law Review, 44, 469-500.
38.
Hagan, F. -1997-. Research methods in criminal justice and criminology -4th ed.-. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
Knorr, S. -1979-. Deterrence and the death penalty: A temporal cross-sectional approach. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 235-254.
40.
Lempert, R. -1981-. Desert and deterrence: An assessment of the moral bases of the case for capital punishment. Michigan Law Review, 79, 1177-1231.
41.
Lempert, R. -1983-. The effect of executions on homicides. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 88-115.
42.
Lotz, R., & Regoli, R. -1980-. Public support for the death penalty. Criminal Justice Review, 5, 55-56.
43.
McGarrell, E., & Sandys, M. -1996-. The misperception of public opinion toward capital punishment. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 500-513.
44.
Paternoster, R. -1991-. Capital punishment in America. New York: Lexington.
45.
Radelet, M., & Akers, R. -1996-. Deterrence and the death penalty: The views of the experts. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87, 1-16.
46.
Radelet, M., Bedau, H., & Putman, C. -1992-. In spite of innocence: Erroneous convictions in capital cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
47.
Radelet, M., Lofquist, L., & Bedau, H. -1996-. Prisoners released from death rows since 1970 because of doubts about their guilt. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 13, 907-966.
48.
Sandys, M. -1995-. Attitudinal change among students in a capital punishment class: It may be possible. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 37-55.
49.
Sandys, M., & McGarrell, E. -1995-. Attitudes toward capital punishment: Preference for the death penalty or mere acceptance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 191-213.
50.
Sarat, A., & Vidmar, N. -1976-. Public opinion, the death penalty, and the Eighth Amendment: Testing the Marshall hypothesis. Wisconsin Law Review, 17, 171-206.
51.
Tyler, T., & Weber, R. -1982-. Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime or symbolic attitude? Law and Society Review, 17, 21-45.
52.
Vidmar, N., & Dittenhoffer, T. -1981-. Informed public opinion and death penalty attitudes. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 23, 43-56.
53.
Waldo, G. -1981-. The death penalty and deterrence: A review of recent research. In Barak-Glantz & C. Huff -Eds.-, The Mad, the bad, and the different: Essays in honor of Simon Dinitz -pp. 169-178-. Lexington, MA: Heath.
54.
Weinstock, D., & Schwartz, G. -1998-. Executing the innocent: Preventing the ultimate injustice. Criminal Law Bulletin, 34, 328-347.
55.
Whitehead, J., & Blankenship, M. -2000-. The gender gap in capital punishment attitudes: An analysis of support and opposition. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 1-13.
56.
Whitehead, J., Blankenship, M., & Wright, J. -1999-. Elite versus citizen attitudes on capital punishment: Incongruity between the public and policy makers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 249-258.
57.
Wright, H., Bohm, R., & Jamieson, K. -1995-. A comparison of uniformed and informed death penalty opinions: A replication and expansion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 57-87.
58.
Zeisel, H., & Gallup, A. -1989-. Death penalty sentiment in the United States. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 285-296.
