Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko: Boss,“They Can’t Hurt You Now”

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, issues surrounding the privatization of various services within correctional settings have been revisited in the United States and internationally. Almost without question, the motivation for implementing privatization of various services within a correctional setting (if not the entirety of an institution, for example) is by nature fiscal. The area of corrections has been the subject of much debate and growth regarding privatization. Yet the newest dawn of the private prison has left many questions unanswered. The answers will likelybe found through litigation on the federal level, and most of the questions will likely deal with issues of liability and culpability. This article focuses on the recent Supreme Court case ofCorrectional Services Corporation v. Malesko (2001). This case addressed the use of afederal civil rights remedy, a Bivens action, against a private correctional facility. As such,the case opinion helps to settle some of the issues surrounding the liability of private correctional institutions as well as generate policy considerations significant to correctional management.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadinsky, H., & Winfree, L. T. (1992). Crime and justice: An introduction. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Benekos, P. J.,& Merlo, A. V. (1995). Three strikes and you’re out!: The politicalsentencing game. Federal Probation, 59(1), 3-9.

Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 338 (1971).

Board of Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Jill Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997).

Cikins, W. I. (1993). Partial privatization of prison operations: Let’s give it a chance. In G. W. Bowman, S. Hakim, & P. Seidenstat (Eds.), Privatizing correctional institutions. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Collins, M. G. (1997). Section 1983 litigation. St. Paul, MN: West.

Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 122 S. Ct. 515 (2001).

DiIulio, J. J. (1988). What’s wrong with private prisons. Public Interest,92, 66-83.

DiIulio, J. J. (1990). Duty to govern: A critical perspective on the private management of prisons and jails. In D. C. McDonald (Ed.), Private prisons and the public interest. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

10.

Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976).

11.

FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471 (1994).

12.

Gilbert, M. J. (1996). Private confinement and the role of government in a civil society. In L. Mays & T. Gray (Eds.), Privatization and the provision of correctional services: Context and consequences. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

13.

Kappeler, V. (1993). Critical issues in police civil liability. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

14.

Lanza-Kaduche, L., Parker, K. F.,& Thomas, C. W. (1999). Comparative recidivism analysis of releases from private and public prisons. Crime and Delinquency, 45(1), 28-47.

15.

Logan, C. H. (1990). Private prisons: Cons and pros. New York: Oxford University Press.

16.

Ogle, R. S. (1999). Prison privatization: An environmental catch-22. Justice Quarterly, 16(3), 579-600.

17.

Pratt, T. C.,& Maahs, J. (1999). Are private prisons more cost-effective than public prisons? Ameta-analysis of evaluation research studies. Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 358-371.

18.

Pratt, T. C.,& Winston, M. R. (1999). Search for the frugal grail: An empirical assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public vs. private correctional facilities. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 10(3), 447-471.

19.

President’s Commission on Privatization. (1988). Contracting out prisons. Privatization:Toward More Effective Government, pp. 146-159.

20.

Richardson v. McNight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997).

21.

Rothman, D. J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.

22.

Rothman, D. J. (1990). The discovery of the asylum. Boston: Little, Brown.

23.

Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998).

24.

Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194; 121 S. Ct. 2151 (2001).

25.

Sellin, T. (1967). A look at prison history. Federal Probation, 31(3), 18-23.

26.

Sullivan, H. J. (1986). Privatization of corrections and the constitutional rights of prisoners. Federal Probation, 53, 36-42.

27.

Thomas, C. W.,& Logan, C. H. (1993). The development, present status, and future potential of correctional privatization in America. In G. W. Bowman, S. Hakim, & P. Seidenstat (Eds.), Privatizing correctional institutions. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

28.

Wallace, D. H. (1994). The eighth amendment and prison deprivations: Historical revisions. Criminal Law Bulletin, 30, 5-29.

29.

Webster v. City of Houston, 735 F.2d 838 (1984).

30.

Zeigler, F. A.,& Del Carmen, R. V. (1996). Three strikes and you’re out: Vengeance as public policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Zimring, F. E. (1997). Lethal violence and the overreach of American imprisonment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.