Asset Forfeiture and Police Priorities: The Impact of Program Design on Law Enforcement Activities

Abstract

This article examines the use of asset forfeiture by law enforcement units within the greater Cincinnati area, using the results of a survey distributed among state and local government law enforcement agencies. The analysis reveals what kinds of assets are confiscated, what kind of legal authority is used to accomplish asset forfeiture, and which individuals are involved in the decisions to confiscate assets and to select a particular kind of legal authority under which the forfeiture will be authorized. The data indicate that the use of asset forfeiture does not have a substantial impact on the policing priorities of local agencies. The sampled jurisdictions tend to use either a criminal forfeiture statute as the legal authority for the seizure or a court-imposed settlement to confiscate assets. By using the criminal court process, jurisdictions avoid sharing the value of the assets.

Keywords

asset forfeiture policing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benson, B. , & Rasmussen, D. (1998). The context of drug policy: An economic interpretation. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(3), 681-700.

Benson, B. , Rasmussen, D. , & Sollars, D. (1995). Police bureaucrats, their incentives, and the war on drugs. Public Choice, 83, 21-45.

Blumenson, E. , & Nilsen, E. (1998). “Policing for profit”: The drug war’s hidden economic agenda. University of Chicago Law Review, 65(1), 35-114.

Hyde, H. (1995). Forfeiting our property rights. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.

Jensen, E. , & Gerber, J. (1996). The civil forfeiture of assets and the war on drugs: Expanding criminal sanctions while reducing due process protection. Crime and Delinquency, 42(3), 421-434.

Levy, L. (1996). A license to steal. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Mast, B. D. , Benson, B. , & Rasmussen, D. (2000). Entrepreneurial police and drug enforcement policy. Public Choice, 104, 285-308.

Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

Niskanen, W. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 617-643.

10.

Rainbolt, G. , & Reif, A. F. (1997). Crime, property, and justice: The ethics of civil forfeiture. Public Affairs Quarterly, 11(1), 39-55.

11.

Worrall, J. L. (2001). Addicted to the drug war: The role of civil asset forfeiture as a budgetary necessity in contemporary law enforcement. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(3), 171-187.