A Case-by-Case Comparison of the Classification of Law Enforcement and Vital Statistics Data on Homicide

Abstract

This study uses data from the California Linked Homicide File as a basis for evaluating the validity and reliability of homicide data. Case-by-case comparisons of variables reported by both agencies indicate that agreement between law enforcement and vital statistics data is highest with classifying homicides and victim gender and race and lowest with classifying victim age, manslaughters, and police justifiable homicides. The findings from a multilevel analysis examining what types of cases are unable to be linked over the two data-collection systems reveal that homicides involving Hispanic victims, weapons other than handguns, and family members other than intimate partners and homicides involving felonies, other nonfelonies, and negligent manslaughters have a greater likelihood of not being matched across the agencies. Death investigation systems that use medical examiners also decrease matching. The need for qualitative research examining how classification decisions are made by police and medical examiners or coroners is discussed.

Keywords

homicide vital statistics Supplementary Homicide Reports deat certificates

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Best, J. (1990). Threatened children: Rhetoric and concern about child-victims. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Best, J. (1999). Random violence: How we talk about new crimes and new victims. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Best, J. (2001). Damned lies and statistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Best, J. , & Horiuchi, G. T. (1985). The razor blade in the apple: The social construction of urban legends. Social Problems, 32, 488-499.

Bryk, A. S. , & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

California Department of Health Services, Epidemiology and Prevention for Injury Control Branch, Violent Injury Surveillance Program . (2001). Linked homicide file, 1990-1991. Sacramento, CA: Author.

Cantor, D. , & Cohen, L. E. (1980). Comparing measures of homicide trends: Methodological and substantive differences in the vital statistics and Uniform Crime Report time series (1933-1975). Social Science Research, 9, 121-145.

Epidemiology Program Office . (2002). Death investigation system descriptions. Retrieved February 25, 2002, from http://www.cdc.gov/epo/dphsi/mecisp/california.htm

Hindelang, M. J. (1974). The Uniform Crime Reports revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 1-17.

10.

Jenkins, P. (1994). Using murder: The social construction of serial homicide. New York: Aldine.

11.

Keppel, R. D. , Weis, J. G. , & LaMoria, R. (1990). Improving the investigation of murder: The homicide information and tracking system (HITS)(National Institute of Justice Final Report No. #87-IJ-CX-0026). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

12.

Lapidus, G. D. , Gregorio, D. I. , & Hansen, H. (1990). Misclassification of childhood homicide on death certificates. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 213-214.

13.

Moyer, L. A. , Boyle, C. A. , & Pollock, D. A. (1989). Validity of death certificates for injury-related causes of death. American Journal of Epidemiology, 130, 1024-1032.

14.

Rand, M. R. (1993). The study of homicide caseflow: Creating a comprehensive homicide dataset. In Questions and answers in lethal and non-lethal violence: Proceedings of the Second Annual Workshop of the Homicide Research Working Group(pp. 103-118). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

15.

Raudenbush, S. , Bryk, A. , Cheong, Y. F. , & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

16.

Raudenbush, S. , Bryk, A. , & Congdon, R. (2001). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

17.

Riedel, M. (1998). Counting stranger homicides: A Case study of statistical prestidigitation. Homicide Studies, 2, 206-219.

18.

Riedel, M. (1999). Sources of homicide data: A review and comparison. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research(pp. 75-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

19.

Riedel, M. (2000). Research strategies for secondary data: A perspective for criminology and criminal justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

Rokaw, W. M. , Mercy, J. A. , & Smith, J. C. (1990). Comparing death certificate data with FBI crime reporting statistics on U.S. homicides. Public Health Reports, 105, 447-455.

21.

Sherman, L. W. , & Langworthy, R. H. (1979). Measuring homicide by police officers. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 546-560.

22.

Swigert, V. (1989). The discipline as data: Resolving the theoretical crisis in criminology. In S. F. Messner , M. D. Krohn , & A. Liska (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects(pp. 129-135). Albany: State University of New York Press.

23.

Van Court, J. , & Trent, R. B. (2004). Why didn't we get them all? Analyzing unlinked records in California's Linked Homicide File. Homicide Studies, 8, 311-321.

24.

Wiersema, B. , Loftin, C. , & McDowall, D. (2000). A comparison of Supplementary Homicide Reports and national vital statistics system homicides estimates for U.S. counties. Homicide Studies, 4, 317-340.