The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina saw a sharp spike in gun-violence, which necessarily re-focused criminological research on the persistent question of how best to prevent gun-related violence. However, a Critical Review published by a National Academy of Science Research Council strongly suggests that previous research evaluating gun-policy outcomes may be unacceptably flawed methodologically, casting serious doubt upon the validity of the results. The research here presented adjusts for those flaws to revise our current knowledge of the effects two of the most common gun-interventions— the Brady Law and “right to carry” Laws—may exert on gun homicide rates and total homicide rates. The Brady Law is found exert a slight but statistically significant effect on both outcomes whereas “right to carry” laws fail to exert statistically significant deterrent effects on either outcome, and both results provisionally contradict earlier gun-policy outcome research, much as the academy report critically suggests.
Almgren, G., Guest, A., Immerwahr, G., & Spittel, M. (1998). Joblessness, family disruption, and violent death in Chicago, 1979—1990. Social Forces, 76(4), 1465—1494.
2.
Cao, L., Adams, A., & Jensen, D. (1997). A test of the black subculture of violence thesis: A research note. Criminology, 35(2), 367—379.
3.
Census of Business and Retail Trade (1987).
4.
Census of Business and Retail Trade (1992).
5.
Census of Business and Retail Trade (1997).
6.
Census of Business and Retail Trade (2002).
7.
Cook, P.J., & Ludwig, J. (2003). Evaluating gun policy: E fects on crime and violence . Washington DC: Brunswick Institution .
8.
Covington, J. (1999). African American communities and violent crime: The construction of race differences. Sociological Focus, 32(1), 7—24.
9.
Crutchfield, R.D. (1989). Stratification and violent crime. Social Forces, 68(2), 489—512.
10.
DeZee, M.R. (1983). Gun control legislation: Impact and ideology. Law and Policy Quarterly, 5, 367—379.
11.
Donahue, J.J. (2003). The impact of right to carry laws. In P. J. Cook & J. Ludwig (Eds.). Evaluating gun policy: E fects on crime and violence (pp. 287—341). Washington DC: Brunswick Institution.
12.
Duggan, M. (2001). More guns, more crime. Journal of Political Economy, 109 (4), 1086—1114.
13.
Florida (1996). Concealed weapons/firearms license statistical report for period 10/01/87-10/31/96 . Tallahassee: Florida Department of State, Division of Licensing.
14.
Grant, D., Sherman, I., & Martinez, R. (1997). Crime and restructuring of the U.S. economy. Social Forces, 75(3), 769—798.
15.
Jacobs, J.B. (2002). Can gun control work?New York : Oxford: University Press.
16.
Kleck, G. (1991). Point blank: Guns and violence in America. New York: Aldine De Gruyter .
17.
Kleck, G. (1997). Targeting guns: Firearms and their control. New York: Aldine De Gruyter .
18.
Lott, J., & Mustard, B.M. (1997). Crime, deterrence, and right to carry concealed handguns. Journal of legalStudies, 26, 1—68.
19.
Lott, J. (2000). More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun control laws. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Ludwig, J. (2005). Better Gun Enforcement, Less Crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(4), 677—716.
21.
Ludwig, J., & Cook, P.J. (2000). Homicide and suicide rates associated with the implementation of the Brady handgun violence prevention act. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 284, 585—591.
22.
Maltz, M.D., & Targonski, J. (2002). A note on the use of county-level UCR data. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 18(2), 297—318.
23.
Moody, C.E. (2001). Testing for the effect of concealed weapons laws: Specification errors and robustness. Journal of Law and Economics , 44(3), 799—813.
24.
Murray, D.R. (1975). Handguns, gun-control laws and firearm violence . Social Problems, 23, 81—92.
25.
O'Brien, K. (2006). In New Orleans, hopes fade for end to iolence . The Boston Globe, 06/01/2006.
26.
Parker, R.N. (1995). Alcohol & homicide: A deadly combination of two American traditions. Albany, New York: State University Press.
27.
Pernanen, K. (1991). Alcohol in human violence. New York: Guilford Press.
28.
Piquero, A.R. (2005). Reliable gun policy and rational policy decisions: Does gun research fit the bill?Criminology & Public Policy , 4(4), 779—798.
29.
Seitz, S.T. (1972). Firearms, homicides and gun control effectiveness . Law and Society Review, 6, 595—614.
30.
Uniform CrimeReports (1990). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
31.
Uniform CrimeReports (1991). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
32.
Uniform CrimeReports (1992). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
33.
Uniform CrimeReports (1993). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
34.
Uniform CrimeReports (1994). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
35.
Uniform CrimeReports (1995). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
36.
Uniform CrimeReports (1996). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
37.
Uniform CrimeReports (1997). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
38.
Uniform CrimeReports (1998). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
39.
Uniform CrimeReports (1999). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
40.
Uniform CrimeReports (2000). U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC.
41.
Wellford, C. (2005). Special issue on gun policy. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(4), 673—676.
42.
Wellford, Pepper & Petrie ( 2005). Firearms and violence: A critical review. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
43.
Yaffee, R. (2000). TimesSeries analysis and forecasting. San Diego: Academic Press.
44.
Zimring, F. (2000). Crime is not the problem: Lethal violence in America . New York: Oxford University Press .
