Research exploring the effects of an offender’s age on unwarranted sentencing disparity has produced conflicting and inconclusive results. Some studies concluded that age was inversely correlated with sentencing severity, whereas others found a positive association. Still others found no significant impact of age on sentencing differentials or that age had a curvilinear effect. Given these inconsistencies, the present research uses meta-analytic methodology to assess empirical findings from a body of sentencing studies. In particular, this research focuses on the imposition of sentence length. Findings from this meta-analysis reveal that the age of the offender has no effect on the length of the prison term and that the strength of the association between the two variables is extremely weak. The homogeneity analysis indicates that variability in effect sizes across contrasts is not due simply to sampling error. A number of moderators related to sample and analytic characteristics account for the differences in effect sizes.
Albonetti, C.A. ( 1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion . Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2.
*Albonetti, C.A. ( 1998). The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white-collar offense under the federal sentencing guidelines. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 1, 3-48.
3.
*Auerhahn, K. ( 2007). Just another crime? Examining disparity in homicide sentencing . Sociological Quarterly, 48, 277-313.
4.
Baier, C.J., & Wright, B.R.E. (2001). "If you love me, keep my commandments": A meta-analysis of the effect of religion on crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 38, 3-21.
5.
*Benson, M.L., & Walker, E. ( 1988). Sentencing the white-collar offender. American Sociological Review, 53, 294-302.
6.
Box, C., & Hale, S. ( 1985). Unemployment, imprisonment and prison overcrowding. Contemporary Crises, 9, 209-228.
7.
Bridges, G.S., & Steen, S. ( 1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 64, 554-570.
8.
*Britt, C.L. ( 2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions . Justice Quarterly, 17, 707-732.
9.
*Bushway, S.D., & Piehl, A.M. ( 2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35, 733-764.
10.
*Bushway, S.D., & Piehl, A.M. ( 2007). Social science research and the legal threat to presumptive sentencing guidelines. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 461-482.
11.
Champion, D.J. ( 1987). Elderly felons and sentencing severity: Interregional variations in leniency and sentencing trends. Criminal Justice Review, 12, 7-14.
12.
*Chiricos, T.G., & Bales, W.D. ( 1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment . Criminology, 29, 701-724.
13.
*Chiricos, T.G., & Waldo, G.P. ( 1975). Socioeconomic status and criminal sentencing: An empirical assessment of a conflict proposition. American Sociological Review, 40, 753-772.
14.
Cohen J. ( 1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin , 112, 155-159.
15.
Cooper, H.M. ( 1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
*Crow, M.S., & Bales, W. ( 2006). Sentencing guidelines and focus concerns: The effect of sentencing policy as a practical constraint on sentencing decisions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 285-304.
17.
*Croyle, J.L. ( 1983). Measuring and explaining disparities in felony sentences: Courtroom work group factors and race, sex, and socioeconomic influences on sentence severity. Political Behavior, 5, 135-153. *Curran, D.A. ( 1983). Judicial discretion and defendant’s sex. Criminology, 21, 41-58.
18.
*Curry, T.R., Lee, G., & Rodriguez, S.F. (2004). Does victim gender increase sentence severity? Further examinations of gender dynamics and sentencing outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 319-343.
19.
Daly, K., & Bordt, R.L. ( 1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 141-175.
20.
Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in felony cases: Comparisons among White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994-1011.
21.
*Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1229.
22.
*Everett, R.S., & Wojtkiewicz, R.A. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 189-211.
23.
*Farnworth, M., & Horan, P.M. ( 1980). Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes. Social Science Research, 9, 381-399.
24.
Feinberg, G., & McGriff, M.D. ( 1989). Defendant’s advanced age as a prepotent status in criminal case disposition and sanction. In S. Chaneles & C. Burnett (Eds.), Older offenders: Current trends (pp. 87-124). New York: Haworth.
25.
Frost, N.A. ( 2006). The punitive state: Crime, punishment, and imprisonment across the United States. New York: LFB.
26.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C.E. ( 1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
27.
*Hanke, P.J. ( 1995). Sentencing disparities by race of offender and victim: Women homicide offenders in Alabama, 1929-1985. Sociological Spectrum, 15, 277-297.
28.
*Hartley, R.D., Maddan, S., & Walker, J.T. ( 2006). Sentencing practices under the Arkansas sentencing guideline structure. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 493-506.
29.
Hawkins, D. ( 1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 1, 207-230.
30.
Hebert, C.G. ( 1997). Sentencing outcomes of Black, Hispanic, and White males convicted under federal sentencing guides. Criminal Justice Review, 22, 133-156.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. ( 1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
33.
*Helms, R., & Jacobs, D. ( 2002). The political context of sentencing: An analysis of community and individual determinants. Social Forces, 81, 577-604.
34.
Hofer, P.J. ( 2007). United States v. Booker as a natural experiment: Using empirical research to inform the federal sentencing policy debate. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 433-460.
35.
*Holmes, M.D., Hosch, H.M., Daudistel, H.C., Perez, D.A., & Graves, J.B. ( 1996). Ethnicity, legal resources, and felony dispositions in two southwestern jurisdictions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 11-30.
36.
*Huang, W.S.W., Finn, M.A., Ruback, B.R., & Friedmann, R.R. (1996). Individual and contextual influences on sentence lengths: Examining political conservatism. The Prison Journal, 76, 398-419.
37.
*Iles, G.D. ( 2006). America’s forgotten paradise: An assessment of sentencing decisions and outcomes in the United States Virgin Islands (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Omaha, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 2329.
38.
*Johnson, B.D. ( 2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259-298.
39.
Kant, I. ( 1965). The metaphysical elements of justice. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
40.
*Kautt, P.M. ( 2000). Separating and estimating the effects of the federal sentencing guidelines and the federal mandatory "minimums": Isolating the sources of racial disparity (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Omaha, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 2048.
41.
*Kautt, P.M., & Spohn, C. ( 2002). Crack-ing down on Black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders’ race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19, 1-35.
42.
*Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L.L. ( 2001). Have federal sentencing guidelines reduced severity? An examination of one circuit. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 17, 111-144.
43.
*Klein, S., Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. ( 1990). Race and imprisonment decisions in California. Science, 247, 812-816.
44.
Kramer, J.H., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 357-376.
45.
Kramer, J.H., & Ulmer, J.T. ( 1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 81-106.
46.
*Kruttschnitt, C. ( 1980-81). Social status and sentences of female offenders. Law & Society Review, 15, 247-265.
47.
*Landes, W. ( 1974). Legality and reality: Some evidence on criminal procedure . Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 287-337.
48.
Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. ( 1993). The efficacy of psychological, education, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist , 48, 1181-1209.
49.
Loftin, C., Heumann, M., & McDowall, D. ( 1983). Mandatory sentencing and firearms violence: Evaluating an alternative to gun control. Law & Society Review, 17, 287-318.
50.
*Miethe, T.D., & Moore, C.A. ( 1985). Socioeconomic disparities under determinate sentencing systems: A comparison of pre-guideline and post-guideline practices in Minnesota . Criminology, 23, 337-363.
51.
Mitchell, O. ( 2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Research, 21, 439-466.
52.
Morris, H. ( 1968). Persons and punishment. Monist, 52, 475-501.
53.
Murphy, J.G., & Coleman, J.L. ( 1990). Philosophy of law: An introduction to jurisprudence. Boulder, CO: Westview.
54.
*Mustard, D.B. ( 2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285-314.
55.
*Myers, M.A. ( 1988). Social background and the sentencing behavior of judges . Criminology, 26, 649-675.
56.
*Myers, M.A. ( 1989). Symbolic policy and the sentencing of drug offenders . Law & Society Review, 23, 295-316.
57.
*Myers, M.A., & Talarico, S.M. (1986). The social contexts of racial discrimination in sentencing. Social Problems, 33, 236-251.
58.
Myers, M.A., & Talarico, S.M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York: Springer.
59.
*Nagel, I.H., & Hagan, J. ( 1982). The sentencing of white-collar criminals in federal courts: A socio-legal exploration of disparity. Michigan Law Review , 80, 1427-1465.
60.
Nobiling, T., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (1998). A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459-485.
61.
*Pasko, L. ( 2002). Villain or victim: Regional variation and ethnic disparity in federal drug offense sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 307-328.
62.
*Peterson, R.D., & Hagan, J. ( 1984). Changing perceptions of race: Towards an account of anomalous findings of sentencing research. American Sociological Review , 49, 56-70.
63.
Pratt, T.C. ( 1998). Race and sentencing: A meta-analysis of conflicting empirical research results. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 513-523.
64.
Rosenthal, R. ( 1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65.
*Simon, L.M.J. ( 1996). The effect of the victim-offender relationship on the sentence length of violent offenders. Journal of Crime and Justice, 19, 129-148.
66.
*Sloan, J.J., & Miller, J.L. ( 1990). Just deserts, the severity of punishment and judicial sentencing decisions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 4, 19-38.
67.
*Smith, B.L., & Damphousse, K.R. (1996). Punishing political offenders: The effect of political motive on federal sentencing decisions. Criminology, 34, 289-322.
68.
Spitzer, S. ( 1975). Toward a Marxist theory of deviance. Social Problems, 22, 638-651.
69.
*Spohn, C. ( 1990). The sentencing decisions of Black and White judges: Expected and unexpected similarities. Law & Society Review, 24, 1197-1216.
70.
Spohn, C. ( 2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In J. Horney (Vol. Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Vol. 3. Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 427-501). Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program, National Institution of Justice.
71.
Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. ( 2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
72.
*Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2000). When does race matter? An examination of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity . Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 2, 3-37.
73.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. ( 2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
74.
Spohn, C., & Sample, L.L. (in press). The dangerous drug offender in federal court: Intersections of race, ethnicity, and culpability. Crime and Delinquency .
75.
*Spohn, C., & Spears, J.W. ( 1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly , 13, 649-679.
76.
*Spohn, C., & Spears, J.W. ( 2003). Sentencing of drug offenders in three cities: Does race/ethnicity make a difference? In D. F. Hawkins, S. L. Myers, Jr., & R. N. Stone (Eds.), Crime control and social justice: The delicate balance (pp. 197-231). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
77.
*Steen, S., Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435-468.
78.
Steffensmeier, D., & Britt, C.L. ( 2001). Judges’ race and judicial decision making: Do Black judges sentence differently? Social Science Quarterly, 82, 749-764.
79.
*Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review , 65, 705-729.
80.
*Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2001). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic-Black- White comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-178.
81.
*Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sentencing: Sentences for male and female White, Black, and Hispanic defendants . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
82.
Steffensmeier, D., & Hebert, C.G. ( 1999). Women and men policymakers: Does the judge’s gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants? Social Forces , 77, 1163-1196.
83.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J.H., & Streifel, C. ( 1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology , 31, 411-446.
84.
*Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J.H., & Ulmer, J.T. ( 1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12, 583-602.
85.
*Steffensmeier, D., & Motivans, M. ( 2000). Older men and older women in the arms of criminal law: Offending patterns and sentencing outcomes. Journal of Gerontology , 55B, S141-S151.
86.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J.T., & Kramer, J.H. ( 1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
87.
Sweeney, L.T., & Haney, C. ( 1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 179-195.
88.
Turner, G.S., & Champion, D.J. (1989). The elderly offender and sentencing leniency. In S. Chaneles & C. Burnett (Eds.), Older offenders: Current trends (pp. 125-140). New York: Haworth .
89.
Ulmer, J.T. ( 2000). The rules have changed-so proceed with caution: A comment on Engen and Gainey’s method for modeling sentencing outcomes under guidelines. Criminology, 38, 1231-1243.
90.
*Ulmer, J.T., & Bradley, M.S. ( 2006). Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenses . Criminology, 44, 631-670.
91.
*Ulmer, J.T., & Johnson, B.D. ( 2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
92.
*Ulmer, J.T., & Kramer, J.H. ( 1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology , 34, 383-408.
93.
United States Sentencing Commission (2007). Guidelines manual. Washington, DC: Author.
94.
Wellford, C.F. ( 2007). Sentencing research for sentencing reform. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 399-402.
95.
*Wheeler, S., Weisburd, D., & Bode, N. ( 1982). Sentencing the white-collar offender: Rhetoric and reality . American Sociological Review, 47, 641-659.
96.
Wilbanks, W. ( 1988). Are elderly felons treated more leniently by the criminal justice system? International Journal of Aging and Human Development , 26, 275-288.
97.
*Williams, M.R. ( 1999). Gender and sentencing: An analysis of indicators. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 10, 471-490.
98.
*Wilmot, K.A., & Spohn, C. ( 2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real-offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 324-343.
99.
Wilson, D.B. ( 2001). Meta-analytic methods for criminology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 71-89.
100.
*Wooldredge, J.D. ( 1998). Analytic rigor in studies of disparities in criminal case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 155-179.
101.
*Wooldredge, J.D. ( 2007). Neighborhood effects on felony sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 238-263.
102.
*Wooldredge, J.D., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2004). Bilevel disparities in court dispositions for intimate assault. Criminology, 42, 417-456.
103.
*Wu, J., & Spohn, C. (in press). Inter-district disparity in sentencing in three U.S. district courts. Crime and Delinquency.
104.
*Zatz, M.S. ( 1984). Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing: A new dimension to an old controversy. Criminology, 22, 147-171.
