The theoretical shortcomings of indeterminate sentencing have been well documented, but less attention has been paid to the theoretical flaws of determinate sentencing. If both sentencing models are premised on faulty theory, is either preferable in practice? This essay examines this question from the perspective of one of the most pressing issues facing policymakers today: limiting the growth of prison populations. Using data from Florida, a determinate sentencing state, and New York, an indeterminate sentencing state, the essay discusses the political and economic issues underlying the growth of prison and parole officials' sentencing discretion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, F.1964The Borderline Of Criminal Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Allen, F.1981The Decline Of The Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy And Social Purpose. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3.
Alschuler, A.1978Sentencing reform and prosecutorial power. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 126:550-77.
4.
American Friends Service Committee1971Struggle For Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
5.
American Law Institute1962Official Draft of the Model Penal Code. Comments on Section 6.06Philadelphia: American Law Institute.
6.
Association of Paroling Authorities International 1992 Unpublished Study.
7.
Austin, J.1993Reforming Florida's Unjust, Costly And Ineffective Sentencing LawsSan Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
8.
Bales, W. and L. Dees1992Mandatory minimum sentencing in Florida: Past trends and future implicationsCrime And Delinquency.38:309-329.
9.
Bogan, K.1990Constructing felony sentencing guidelines in an already crowded state: Oregon breaks new ground. Crime And Delinquency. 36:467-87.
10.
Bottomley, K.1990Parole in transition: A comparative study of origins, development, and prospects for the 1990s In Michael Tonry and Norval Morris (eds.) Crime And Justice: A Review Of Research . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Casper, J., D. Brereton, and D. Neal1982The Implementation Of The California Determinate Sentencing Law. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Clear, T., J. Hewitt, and R. Regoli1978Discretion and the determinate sentence: Its distribution, control, and effect on time servedCrime And Delinquency . 24:428-445.
13.
Coughlin, T.1993Opening Statement Before A Joint Session Of The Senate Committee On Finance And Assembly Ways And Means. Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
14.
Davis, K.C.1969Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary InquiryUrbana: University of Illinois Press. Economic and Demographic Research Division Joint Legislative Management Committee
15.
1992An Empirical Examination Of The Application Of Florida's Habitual Offender StatuteTallahassee: Economic and Demographic Research Division Joint Legislative Management Committee .
Florida Criminal Justice Estimating Conference1994Final Report Of The Criminal Justice Estimating ConferenceTallahassee: Florida Criminal Justice Estimating Conference.
18.
Florida Department of Corrections1993aInformation Manual. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Corrections.
19.
Florida Department of Corrections1993bCorrections As A Business: Making Public Dollars Go Further . Tallahassee: Florida Department of Corrections.
20.
Florida Department of Corrections1994Telephone Information Service. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Corrections.
21.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission1983Florida Parole And Probation Commission Annual Report, 1982-83Tallahassee: Florida Parole and Probation Commission.
22.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission1984Florida Parole And Probation Commission Annual Report, 1983-84 . Tallahassee: Florida Parole and Probation Commission.
23.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission1989Florida Parole And Probation Commission Annual Report, 1988-89Tallahassee: Florida Parole and Probation Commission.
24.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission1993Rules Of The Florida Parole Commission. Tallahassee: Florida Parole Commission.
25.
Florida Parole and Probation CommissionUndated Aggravating And Mitigating Factors. Tallahassee : Florida Parole Commission.
26.
Frankel, M.1972Criminal Sentences: Law Without Order. New York: Hill and Wang.
27.
Frase, R.1994Sentencing guidelines "alive and well."Overcrowded Times.5:1-14.
28.
Friedman, L.1993Crime And Punishment In American History. New York: BasicBooks.
29.
Griset, P.1991Determinate Sentencing: The Promise And The Reality Of Retributive Justice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
30.
Griset, P.1994Determinate sentencing and the high cost of overblown rhetoric: The New York experience. Crime And Delinquency . 40: 532-548.
31.
Griswold, D. and M. Wiatrowski1983The emergence of determinate sentencingFederal Probation. 47:28-35.
32.
Griswold, D.1985Florida's sentencing guidelines: Progression or regression?Federal Probation. 49:25-32.
33.
Griswold, D.1987Deviation from sentencing guidelines: The issue of unwarranted disparity. Journal Of Criminal Justice. 15:317-329.
34.
Griswold, D.1989Florida's sentencing guidelines: Six years laterFederal Probation. 53:46-50.
35.
Handberg, R. and N.G. Holton1985The Impact Of Florida's Sentencing Guidelines On The Processing And Disposition Of Criminal Cases. Orlando : Mimeographed.
36.
Handberg, R. and N.G. Holton1993Reforming Florida's Sentencing Guidelines: Balancing Equity, Justice, And Public Safety. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendell-Hunt .
37.
Irwin, J. and J. Austin1994It's About Time: America's Imprisonment Binge. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
38.
McGarrell, E.1985Changes In New York's Juvenile Corrections System. Rockefeller Institute Working Papers, No. 22Albany: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
39.
Morris, N.1974The Future Of Imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
New York State Department of Correctional Services1992aEarned Eligibility Program Statistical Report July 1987 Through September 1992Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
41.
New York State Department of Correctional Services1992bThe Comprehensive Alcohol And Substance Abuse Treatment Program As Of October 1992Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
42.
New York State Department of Correctional Services1992cTemporary Release Program: 1992 Annual ReportAlbany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
43.
New York State Department of Correctional Services1992dDay Reporting Program Profile. Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
44.
New York State Department of Correctional Services1993aThe Comprehensive Alcohol And Substance Abuse Treatment ProgramAlbany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
45.
New York State Department of Correctional Services1993bAbsconders And Parolees From Work Release: January-June 1993Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
46.
New York State Department of Correctional Services and Division of Parole1993The Fifth Annual Shock Legislative Report. Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services and Division of Parole.
47.
New York State Department of Correctional Services and Division of Parole1994The Sixth Annual Shock Legislative Report. Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services and Division of Parole.
48.
New York State Division of the Budget1994Internal DocumentAlbany: New York State Division of the Budget.
49.
New York Temporary Commission on Revision of the Penal Law and Criminal Code1964Commission Staff Notes . Brooklyn: Edward Thompson Co .
50.
Pelgrin, W.1993Commentary On Section 805, Corrections Law. McKinney's Consolidated Laws Of New York Annotated, Book 10BSt. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing.
51.
Persico, J.1982The Imperial Rockefeller. New York: Simon and Schuster.
52.
Proband, S.1995Corrections cost lead state budget increases for 1995. Overcrowded Times.6:1-9.
53.
Ritchie, S.1992The Growing Problem Of Corrections For American States. State Fiscal Briefs. Albany, NY: Center for the Study of States, Rockefeller Institute for Government.
54.
Rothman, D.1980Conscience And Convenience: The Asylum And Its Alternatives In Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
55.
Shane-DuBow, S., A. Brown, and E. Olsen1985Sentencing Reform In The United States: History, Content, And Effect. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
56.
Singer, R.1979Just Deserts: Sentencing Based On Equity And Deserts . Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing.
57.
Stolzenberg, L. and S. D'Alessio1994Sentencing and unwarranted disparity: An empirical assessment of the long-term impact of sentencing guidelines in Minnesota . Criminology. 32: 301-310.
58.
Sundberg, A., K. Plante, and K. Palmer1980A proposal for sentencing reform in Florida. Florida State University Law Review. 8:1-20.
59.
Tonry, M.1988Structuring sentencing. In Michael Tonry and Norval Morris (eds.), Crime And Justice: A Review Of Research267-337. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.
60.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics1992aPrisoners In 1992Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
61.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics1992bCensus Of State And Federal Correctional Facilities, 1990Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
62.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics1994aTelephone Clearinghouse Service. Washington, D.C.
63.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics1994bSourcebook Of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1993. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
64.
Van Den Haag, E.1975Punishing Criminals. New York : Basic Books.
65.
von Hirsch, A.1976Doing Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
66.
von Hirsch, A.1981Desert and previous convictions in sentencing. Minnesota Law Review. 65: 591-634.
67.
von Hirsch, A., K. Knapp, and M. Tonry1987The Sentencing Commission And Its Guidelines . Boston: Northeastern University Press.
68.
von Hirsch, A. and K. Hanrahan1981Determinate penalty systems in America: An overview . Crime And Delinquency.27:289-316.
69.
Walker, S.1993Taming The System: The Control Of Discretion In Criminal Justice 1950-1990NY, NY: Oxford University Press.
70.
Wechsler, H.1968Codification of criminal law in the United States: The model penal codeColumbia Law Review.68: 1425-1456.
71.
Wilson, J.Q.1975Thinking About CrimeNew York : Bantam Books.
72.
Zimring, F. and G. Hawkins1992Prison Populations And Criminal Justice Policy In CaliforniaBerkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
