IDEA '97 and Educator Standards: Special Educators' Perceptions of Their Skil[Is and Those of General Educators

Abstract

The authors provide results of a study analyzing special educator's beliefs regarding special and general educators' skills in implementing legal mandates described in Public Law 105-17, the individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA '97). The authors compare how preservice and practicing special educators approach legal mandates, and what special educators perceive to be the influence of their preservice preparation andlor continuing professional development opportunities on satisfying legal requirements. The groups shared similar, negative perceptions regarding their general education counterparts' skills to adapt general education curricula and to accommodate student needs for statewide assessments. The groups differed in their responses to a number of items regarding student suspensions and the appropriateness of general education preparation programs to meet the needs of students with disabilities. There appears to be a continued division between general and special educators. Preservice and inservice programs should be designed to integrate general and special educators in order to unify the service delivery systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambach, G. (1996). Standards for educators: Potential for improving practice. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 207-210.

Andrew, M.D. (1997). What matters most for educator educators. Journal of Educator Education, 48, (3),167-176.

Blanton, L. P. , Griffin, C. C. , Winn, J. A. , & Pugach, M. C. (Eds.) (1997). Educator education in transition: Collaborative programs to prepare general and special educators. Denver, CO: Love.

Council for Exceptional Children. (1998). What every special educator must know: The international standards for the preparation and certification of special education educators (3rd. ed.). Reston, VA : Author.

deBettencourt, L.U. (1999). General educators' attitudes toward students with mild disabilities and their use of instructional strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 20(1) 27-35.

Hardman, M. , McDonnell, J. , & Welch, M. (1998). Special education in an era of school reform: Preparing special education teachers. Washington, DC: Regional Resource and Federal Center Network-Academy of Educational Development .

Hehir, T. (1999). The changing roles of special education leadership in the next millennium: thoughts and reflections. Journal of Special Education Leadership 12 (1), 3-8.

Houston, P. (1999) Special education administrators as team members of the superintendency: A commentary. Journal of Special Education Leadership 12 (1), 31-32.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Public Law No. 105-17 (1997). 20 U.S. Code Section 1400 et. Seq.

10.

Interstate New Educator Assessment and Support Consortium [INTASC] (1991). Model standards for beginning educator licensing & development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers .

11.

Interstate New Educator Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning educator licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

12.

Kauffman, J.M. & Hallahan, D.P. (1993). Toward a comprehensive delivery system for special education. In J.I. Goodlad and T.C. Lovitt (Eds.) Integrating general and special education, pp. 73-102, New York: Merrill.

13.

Kilgore, K.L. & Griffin, C.C. (1998). Beginning special educators: Problems of practice and the influence of school context. Educator Education and Special Education, 21, (3), 155-173.

14.

Langdon, C.A. (1999). The Fifth Phi Delat Kappa Poll of Teacher Attitudes Toward Tbe Public Schools. Center for Evaluation Development and Research . Bloomington, Ind: Phi Delat Kappa .

15.

Maag, J.W. & Katsiyannis, A. (1999). Educator preparation in E/BD: A national survey. Behavioral Disorders, 24 (3), 189-196.

16.

McLaughlin, M.J. (1999). Access to the general education curriculum: Paperwork and procedures or redefining "special education." Journal of Special Education Leadership 12 (1), 9-14.

17.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1994). What educators should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: Author.

18.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1996a). Guide to national certification. Washington, DC: Author.

19.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1996b). Exceptional needs specialist: Draft standards for national board certification. Washington, DC : Author.

20.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (1996b). Summary report. What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author .

21.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Educators for America's Future . New York: Author.

22.

National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (1996). Educators take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student success. Washington, DC: Author.

23.

O'Shea, D.J. , Williams, A.L. , & Sattler, R.O. (March-April 1999). Collaboration across special education and general education: Preservice level educators' views. Journal of Educator Education , 50, (2), 147-158.

24.

Poister, T.H. (1978). Public program analysis: Applied research methods . Baltimore: University Park Press .

25.

Systat (1987). The system for statistics. Systat, Inc., Evanston, ILL.: Author.

26.

U.S. Department of Education. (1990). Twelfth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

27.

U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. department of Education.

28.

Ysseldyke, J. , & Olsen, K. (1999). Putting alternate assessments into practice: What to measure and possible sources of data. Exceptional Children 65(2), 175-185.