Software Evaluation for Special Needs: Preparing the Preservice Teacher from an Inservice Perspective

Abstract

For most experienced educators, choosing software for children with disabilities is challenging as the number of programs in our technology rich marketplace increases dramatically. Purchasing titles for entertainment is much less complicated than selecting effective educational materials based upon sound instructional objectives through a systematic review of characteristics of learner and learning environment. This study was designed to investigate the software selection process engaged in by special education teachers. Questionnaires were completed by 144 respondents with a return rate of 69% to (a) identify characteristics perceived as important to consider when determining which programs to select for use by students with high incidence disabilities, and (b) ascertain a list of software titles used in special education classrooms currently. Based upon qualitative data analysis, results indicated ten themes inservice teachers consider when selecting software titles. Those themes include: (a) welcoming; (b) sensory stimulating; (c) learner program design; (d) learner empowerment; (e) technology adaptation; (f) diversity; (g) individual instructional integration; (h) narration; (i) curriculum encompassing; and (j) teacher functionality. Additionally this paper provides a list of software titles used in classrooms currently and describes implications for integrating a software evaluation component into a methods course.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alder, D. (1994). Getting clean with Herkimer: A software package for teaching children in special education to classify common objects. Computers in Education, 23(3), 227–235.

Allessi, S. , & Trollip, S. (1991). Computer-based instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bender, R. L. , & Bender, W. N. (1995). Computer-assisted instruction for students at risk for ADHD, mild disabilities, or academic problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Borgh, K. , & Dickson, W. P. (1986). Two preschoolers sharing one computer: Creating prosocial behavior with hardware and software. In P. F. Campbell & G. G. Fein (Eds.), Young children and microcomputers (p 38–44). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bos, C. S. , & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Buckleitner, W. (1996). No fail software. Child Care Information Exchange, 2, 25–27.

Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 2, 75–126.

Cobb, J. (1995). Microcomputers: Bridging the gap for at-risk readers. Preventing School Failure, 40(1), 37–40.

Coley, R. , Cradler, J. , & Engel, P. K. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U. S. schools policy information report. (Report No. IR 018 351). Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 893)

10.

Escobedo, T. H. , & Evans, S. (1997). A comparison of child-tested early childhood education software with professional ratings. (Report No. PS 025 697). Chicago, IL: American Education Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 411 060)

11.

Forgan, J. W. & Weber, R. K. (2001). Selecting software for students with high-incidence disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31(1), 40–47.

12.

Hakkien, P. (1996). Software designers and teachers as evaluators of computer-based learning environments. Machine-Mediated Learning, 5(2), 135–148.

13.

Haughland, S. W. (1992). The effect of computer software on preschool children's developmental gains. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 2, 15–30.

14.

International Society for Technology in Education (1999, May). ISTE recommended foundations in technology for all teachers. Retrieved January 5, 2002, from http://www.netc.org/products/ncateiste/appendix/appendc.html

15.

International Society for Technology in Education (2002, April). ISTE national educational technology standards performance profiles for preparing tomorrow's teachers to use technology. Retrieved April 5, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://cnets.iste.org/TeacherStandards.html

16.

International Society for Technology in Education (2002, April). ISTE technology foundation standards for all students. Retrieved April 5, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://cnets.iste.org/sfors.htm

17.

Janssen, S. Brader, L. & Louis, T. (1996). The importance of customizing computer-assisted education software to meet the particular needs of learns. Medical Teacher, 18(3), 237–240.

18.

Lahm, E. , & Nickels, B. (1999). Assistive technology competencies for special educators. The Council for Exceptional Children, 32(1), 56–63.

19.

Lee, J. (1997). Selecting and evaluating CD-ROMs: A public school media specialist's perspective. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 34(4), 368–379.

20.

Malouf, D. , Morariu, J. , Coulson, D. , & Maiden, V. (1989). Special education teachers' preferences for sources of software evaluation information. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9(3), 144–155.

21.

McDougal, A. & Squires, D. (1995). An empirical study of a new paradigm for choosing educational software. Computers & Education, 25(3), 93–103.

22.

Miles, M. , & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

23.

Moore, J. (1990). Finding the right educational software for your child. Exceptional Parent, 20(7) 58–62.

24.

National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (2002). Program standards. Retrieved August 13, 2002 from http://ncate.org/standard/m_stds.htm.

25.

Nave, G. , Browning, P. & Carter, J. (1983). Computer technology for the handicapped in special education and rehabilitation: A resource guide. The International Council for Computers in Education.

26.

Reiser, R. & Kegelmann, H. (1994). Evaluating instructional software: A review and critique of current methods. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(3), 63–69.

27.

Richards, T. (1993). Evaluating CD-ROM software: A model. CD-ROM Professional, 6(5), 92–99.

28.

Roblyer, M. , Edwards, J. , & Harvriluk, M. (1997). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

29.

Shade, D. D. (1996). Software evaluation. Young Children, 51(6), 17–21.

30.

Smith, R. & Vokurka, J. (1990). A software selection model for the special student. The Computing Teacher, 17(5), 36–38.

31.

Squires, D. , & McDougal, A. (1996). Software valuation: A situated approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2, 146–161.

32.

Sweeney, M. , Maguire, M. , & Shackel, B. (1993). Evaluating user-computer interaction: A framework. Interactive Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 2, 689–711.

33.

Wise, Arthur E. (2000). Standards or no standards? Teacher quality in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. Retrieved January 20, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ncate.org/newsbrfs/prepare.htm