Co-Teaching at the Pre-Service Level: Special Education Majors Collaborate with English Education Majors

Abstract

General education and special education teacher candidates lack experience in collaborating with each other as colleagues; however, upon graduating and entering their own classrooms, most are expected to know how to provide services to students with disabilities in the general classroom. This study describes the efforts of two professors, one in special education and the other in English education, to have their students participate in a collaborative and consultative relationship with each other at the pre-service level. Data are comprised of pre- and post-surveys, as well as weekly written reflections by the teacher candidates. Significant differences were found across programs and within the English education program. Reflections reveal differing participant perceptions of the co-teaching experience. Findings indicate exposure to co-teaching at the pre-service level provides an opportunity to address the roles and responsibilities of general and special educators in working together to ensure academic success for all learners.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers' beliefs about coteaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245–255.

Charmaz, K. (Ed.). (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes: Sage.

Cook, L. , & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching guidelines for creative effective practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28 3, 1–12.

Dieker, L. A. , & Murawski, W. W. (2003). Coteaching at the secondary levels: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions for success. The High School Journal, 86 4, 1–13.

Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1997, § 1400 et seq.; 34 C.F.R. § 300 et. seq.

Karger, J. (2004). Access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities: A discussion of the interrelationship between IDEA and NCLB. Retrieved May, 25, 2005, from http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_discussion. html

Karger, J. , & Hitchcock, C. (2003). Access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities: A brief legal interpretation. Retrieved May 25, 2005, from http://www. cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_accesslegal.html

Keefe, E. B. , & Moore, V. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32 3, 77–88.

Mastropieri, M. A. , & Scruggs, T. E. (2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 265–274.

10.

Mastropieri, M. A. , Scruggs, T. E. , & Graetz, J. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 260–270.

11.

Murowski, W. W. (2002). Including co-teaching in a teacher preparation program: A vital addition. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6 2, 113–116.

12.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.

13.

O'Shea, D. J. (1999). Making uninvited inclusion work. Preventing School Failure, 43 4, 179–180.

14.

Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

15.

U. S. Department of Education. (2002a). Digest of Education Statistics (NCES 2003060). Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office.

16.

U. S. Department of Education. (2002b). Twentyfourth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington D.C.

17.

U. S. Department of Education. (2005). New no child left behind flexibility: Highly qualified teachers [Fact Sheet]. Retrieved May, 25, 2005, from http://www.ed. gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html