Methods for a Multisite Randomized Trial to Investigate the Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Improving Upper Extremity Function among Adults Recovering from a Cerebrovascular Stroke
Free accessOtherFirst published online September, 2003
Methods for a Multisite Randomized Trial to Investigate the Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Improving Upper Extremity Function among Adults Recovering from a Cerebrovascular Stroke
This article describes the study design, methodological considerations, and demographic characteristics of a phase III RCT to determine if 1) constraint-induced therapy (CI therapy) can be applied with therapeutic success 3 to 9 months after stroke across different sites, 2) gains that might occur persist over 2 years, 3) initial level of motor ability determines responsiveness to CI therapy, and 4) the treatment effect differs between those treated before 9 months and after 1 year. Six sites will screen and recruit poststroke survivors stratified on initial level of motor ability and after randomization allocate participants to immediate or delayed intervention. Primary outcomes include a laboratory-based measure of function (Wolf Motor Function Test [WMFT]) and a real-world participant-centered functional use measure (Motor Activity Log [MAL]). Secondary outcomes concern function, behavior, and compliance. This is the first multisite, single-blind RCT of a formal training intervention for upper extremity rehabilitation in subacute stroke in the United States.
References
1.
1. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, et al. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks . Stroke1998;29: 415-421 .
2.
2. Davis P, Taylor TN, Torner JC. Projected number of strokes in the year 2050 in the United States . Paper presented at the American Heart Association's 23rd International Joint Conference on Stroke and Cerebral Circulation, February 1998, Davis, California.
3.
3. American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics, 2003 update.
4.
4. Woldag H, Hummelsheim H. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review . J Neurol2002;249: 518-528 .
5.
5. van der Lee JH, Snels IAK, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Wagenaar RC, Bouter LM. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials . Clin Rehab2001;15: 20-31 .
6.
6. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke . Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993;74: 347-354 .
7.
7. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients . Exp Neurol1989;104: 104-132 .
8.
8. van der Lee J, Wagenaar R, Lankhorst G, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial . Stroke1999;30: 2369-2375 .
9.
9. Morris D, Crago J, DeLuca S, Pidikiti R, Taub E. Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke . Neurorehab1997;9: 29-43 .
10.
10. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced (CI) movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients . Top Stroke Rehabil1997;3: 38-61 .
11.
11. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti RD. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—a clinical review . J Rehab Res Dev1999;36: 237-251 .
12.
12. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al. An operant approach to overcoming learned nonuse after CNS damage in monkeys and man: the role of shaping . J Exp Anal Beh1994;61: 281-293 .
13.
(Handbook of neuropsychology; 2nd ed., vol. 9.)
14.
14. Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint induced movement therapy in stroke . The Neurologist. 2002;8: 325-338 .
15.
15. Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris DM. Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorganization following constraint-induced movement therapy . Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America2003;14: S77-S91 .
16.
16. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke2000;31: 2984-2988 .
17.
17. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with sub-acute stroke . Phys Ther1999;79: 847-853 .
18.
18. Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, Levine P, Hughes M. Modified constraint-induced therapy in subacute stroke: a case report . Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002;83: 286-290 .
19.
19. Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA. Electromyographic biofedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status . Phys Ther1983;63: 1393-1403 .
20.
20. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation . Rehabilitation Psychology1998;43: 152-170 .
21.
21. Taves DR. Minimization: a new method for assigning patients to treatment and control groups . Clin Pharmacol Ther1974;15: 443-453 .
22.
22. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts ; 1938.
23.
23. Skinner BF. The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts ; 1968.
24.
24. Morgan WG. The shaping game: a teaching technique . Behav Ther1974;5: 271-272 .
25.
25. Panyan MV. How to use shaping. Lawrence (KS): H & H Enterprises ; 1980.
26.
26. Holding DH. Principles of training. New York: Pergamon ;1965.
27.
27. Kelley CR. What is adaptive training? Human Factors1969;11: 547-556 .
28.
28. Lintern G, Gopher D. Adaptive training of perceptual motor skills: issues results and future directions . International Journal of Man-Machine Studies1978;10: 521-551 .
29.
29. Mane AM, Adams JA, Donchin E. Adaptive and part-whole training in the acquisition of a complex perceptual-motor skill . Acta Psychol (Amst)1989;71: 179-196 .
30.
30. Winstein CJ. Designing practice for motor learning: clinical implications. In: Lister MJ, editor. Contemporary management of motor control problems: proceedings of the ii step conference. Alexandria (VA): Foundation for Physical Therapy ; 1991.
31.
31. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champagne (IL): Human Kinetics ; 1999.
32.
32. Morris DM, Taub E. Constraint-induced therapy approach to restoring function after neurological injury . Top Stroke Rehabil2001;8: 16-30 .
33.
33. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW III, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke . Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001;82: 750-755 .
34.
34. Wolf SL, Catlin P, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke . Stroke2001;32: 1635-1639 .
35.
35. Uswatte G, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In: Stuss DT, Winocur G,.Robertson IH, editors. Cognitive neurorehabilitation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press ; 1999. p. 215-229.
36.
36. Uswatte G., Miltner WHR, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, Taub E. Objective measurement of functional upper extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter . Stroke2000;31: 662-667 .
37.
37. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change . Stroke1999;30: 2131-2140 .
39. Tryon WW, Williams R. Fully proportional actigraphy: a new instrument . Behavior Research Method, Instruments, & Computers1996;28: 392-403 .
40.
40. Uswatte G, Foo B, Olmstead H, Myrick A, Taub E. Objective measurement of arm movement in the community with accelerometry: a real-world index of rehabilitation outcome [Abstract] . Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000;81: 1618 .
41.
41. Thompson PA, Littlewood S, Adelman AJ, Miller JP. The web data entry system: methods for web development and SAS data management . In: SAS Institute, editor. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference; 2002.
42.
42. Trinkaus KM, Thompson PA, Miller JP. Using SAS/IntrNet software to support distributed data entry . In: SAS Institute, editor. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference; 2000. p. 1212-1217 .
43.
43. Tate DG, Findley T Jr, Dijkers M, Nobunaga AI, Karunas RB. Randomized clinical trials in medical rehabilitation research . Am J Phys Med Rehabil1999;78: 486-499 .
44.
44. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. New York: Williams & Wilkins ; 1980. p. 371-401.
45.
45. De Weerdt W, Feys H. Assessment of physiotherapy for patients with stroke. Commentary . Lancet2002;359: 182-183 .
46.
46. Wade DT. Editorial: barriers to rehabilitation research, and overcoming them . Clin Rehab2003;17: 1-4 .
