Clinical Neurophysiological Assessment of Residual Motor Control in Post-Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis

Abstract

Objective. This study was designed to characterize the rudimentary residual lower-limb motor control that can exist in clinically paralyzed spinal-cord-injured individuals. Methods. Sixty-seven paralyzed spinal-cord-injured subjects were studied using surface electromyography recorded from muscles of the lower limbs and analyzed for responses to a rigidly administered protocol of reinforcement maneuvers, voluntary movement attempts, vibration, or the ability to volitionally suppress withdrawal evoked by plantar surface stimulation. Results. Markers for the subclinical discomplete motor syndrome were found in 64% of the subjects. The tonic vibration response was recorded in 37%, volitional plantar surface stimulation response suppression in 27%, and reinforcement maneuver responses in 6% of the subjects. Three subjects, 4%, produced reliable but very low amplitude surface electromyography during the voluntary movement segment of the protocol. Surface electromyography recorded during passive leg movement was related to Ashworth scores as was the tonic vibration response marker (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Multimuscle surface electromyography patterns recorded during a rigidly administered protocol of motor tasks can be used to differentiate between clinically paralyzed spinal-cord-injured individuals using subclinical motor output to identify the translesional neural connections that remain available for intervention testing and treatment planning after spinal cord injury.

Keywords

Spinal cord injury Paralysis Electromyography Motor control

References

1. Kakulas B . The applied neurobiology of human spinal cord injury: a review. Paraplegia 1988;26:371-379.

2. Bunge RP , Puckett WR , Becerra JL , Marcillo A , Quencer RM . Observations on the pathology of human spinal cord injury: a review and classification of 22 new cases with details from a case of chronic cord compression with extensive focal demyelination. In: F. J. Seil , ed. Advances in neurology, vol. 59. New York: Raven; 1993. p. 75-89.

3. Kakulas B . A review of the neuropathology of human spinal cord injury with emphasis on special features. J Spinal Cord Med 1999;22:119-124.

4. Maynard FM , Bracken MB , Creasey G , et al. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1997;35(5):266-274.

5. Dimitrijevic MR , Dimitrijevic MM , Faganel J , Sherwood AM . Suprasegmentally induced motor unit activity in paralyzed muscles of patients with established spinal cord injury. Ann Neurol 1984:16:216-221.

6. Sherwood AM , Dimitrijevic MR , McKay WB . Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI. J Neurol Sci 1992:110:90-98.

7. Dimitrijevic MR . Neurophysiology in spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1987:25:205-208.

8. Dimitrijevic MR , Spencer WA , Trontelj JV , Dimitrijevic MM . Reflex effects of vibration in patients with spinal cord lesions. Neurology 1977;27:1078-1086.

9. Sherwood AM , Dimitrijevic MR , McKay WB , Bacia T . Characteristics of the vibratory reflex in humans with reduced suprasegmental influence due to spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1993;5:119-129.

10.

10. Cioni B , Dimitrijevic MR , McKay WB , Sherwood AM . Voluntary supraspinal suppression of spinal reflex activity in paralyzed muscles of spinal cord injury patients. Exp Neurol 1986;93:574-583.

11.

11. Ashworth B . Preliminary trial of carisoprodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 1964;192:540-542.

12.

12. Sherwood AM , McKay WB , Dimitrijevic MR . Motor control after spinal cord injury: assessment using surface EMG. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:966-979.

13.

13. Sherwood AM , Priebe MM , Graves D . Consistency of multi-channel surface EMG recordings: application in spinal cord injured subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1997;7(2):97-111.

14.

14. Lee DC , Lim HK , McKay WB , Priebe MM , Holmes SA , Sherwood AM . Toward an objective interpretation of surface EMG patterns: a voluntary response index (VRI). J Electromyog Kinesiol. In press 2004.

15.

15. Sherwood AM , Graves DE , Priebe MM . Altered motor control and spasticity after spinal cord injury: subjective and objective assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37(1):41-52.

16.

16. Matthews PB . The reflex excitation of the solueus muscle of the decerebrate cat caused by vibration applied to its tendon. J Physiol 1966;184(2):450-472.

17.

17. Faganel J , Dimitrijevic MR . Study of propriospinal interneuron system in man: cutaneous exterocptive conditioning stretch reflexes. J Neurol Sci 1982;56:155-172.

18.

18. Lim HK , Lee DC , McKay WB , et al. Analysis of sEMG during voluntary movement: motor score changes after intervention. IEEE. In press 2004.

19.

19. Priebe MM , Sherwood AM , Thornby JI , Karas NF , Markowski J . Clinical assessment of spasticity in spinal cord injury: a multidimensional Problem. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:713-716.

20.

20. Pandyan AD , Price CIM , Curless RH , Barnes MP , Rodgers H . A review of the properties and limitation of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:373-383.

21.

21. Skold C , Harms-Ringdahl K , Hultling C , Levi R , Seiger A . Simultaneous Ashworth measurements and electro-myographic recordings in tetraplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:959-965.

22.

22. Lance JW . Pathophysiology of spasticity and clinical experience with baclofen. In: Lance JW , Feldman RG , Young RR , Koella WP , eds. Spasticity: disordered motor control. Chicago: Yearbook; 1980.

23.

23. Sherwood AM , Graves DE , Priebe MM . Altered motor control and spasticity after spinal cord injury: subjective and objective assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37(1):41-52.

24.

24. Hulsebosch CE . Recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment of spinal cord injury. Adv Physiol Educ 2002;26(1-4):238-255.

25.

25. McDonald JW , Becker D . Spinal cord injury: promising interventions and realistic goals. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82 Suppl:S38-S49.

26.

26. Leipert J , Miltner WHR , Bauder H , et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.

27.

27. Lim HK , Lee DC , McKay WB , et al. Analysis of sEMG during voluntary movement: II. Voluntary response index to change. IEEE Trans NSRE. In press 2004.

28.

28. Latash ML , Penn RD , Corcos DM , Gottlieb GL . Short-term effects of intrathecal baclofen in spasticity. Exp Neurol 1989;103(2):165-172.

29.

29. Ivanhoe CB , Tilton AH , Francisco GE . Intrathecal baclofen therapy for spastic hypertonia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2001;12(4):923-938, viii-ix.

30.

30. Jilge B , Minassian K , Rattay F , et al. Initiating extension of the lower limbs in subjects with complete spinal cord injury by epidural lumbar cord stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2004;154(3):308-326.

31.

31. Pinter MM , Gerstenbrand F , Dimitrijevic MR . Epidural electrical stimulation of posterior structures of the human lumbosacral cord: 3. Control of spasticity. Spinal Cord 2000;38(9):524-531.