The Impact of Weight Labels on Body Image,Internalized Weight Stigma,Affect,Perceived Health,and Intended Weight Loss Behaviors in Normal-Weight and Overweight College Women
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2017
The Impact of Weight Labels on Body Image,Internalized Weight Stigma,Affect,Perceived Health,and Intended Weight Loss Behaviors in Normal-Weight and Overweight College Women
To explore the psychological impact of weight labels.
Design:
A double-blind experiment that randomly informed participants that they were “normal weight” or “overweight.”
Setting:
Public university in Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
Participants:
Normal-weight and overweight female undergraduates (N = 113).
Measures:
The Body Image States Scale, Stunkard Rating Scale, Weight Bias Internalization Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, General Health question from the 12-item Short Form Health Survey, modified version of the Weight Loss Methods Scale, and a manipulation check.
Analysis:
A 2 × 2 between-subjects analysis of variance explored the main effects of the assigned weight label and actual weight and interactions between assigned weight label and actual weight.
Results:
Significant main effects of the assigned weight label emerged on measures of body dissatisfaction, F(1, 109) = 12.40, p = .001, = 0.10, internalized weight stigma, F(1, 108) = 4.35, p = .039, = .04, and negative affect, F(1, 108) = 9.22, p = .003, = .08. Significant assigned weight label × actual weight interactions were found on measures of perceived body image, F(1, 109) = 6.29, p = .014, = .06, and perceived health, F(1, 109) = 4.18, p = .043, = .04.
Conclusion:
A weight label of “overweight” may have negative psychological consequences, particularly for overweight women.
ThompsonDEdelsbergJColditzGABirdAPOsterG. Lifetime health and economic consequences of obesity. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(18):2177–2183.
2.
MillsTC. Predicting body fat using data on the BMI. J Stat Edu. 2005;13(2):1–3.
3.
PrenticeAMJebbSA. Beyond body mass index. Obes Rev. 2001;2(3):141–147.
4.
FlegalKMKitBKOrpanaHGraubardBI. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(1):71–82.
5.
HubbardVS.Defining overweight and obesity: what are the issues?Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(5):1067–1068.
6.
JonesMGriloCMMashebRMWhiteMA. Psychological and behavioral correlates of excess weight: misperception of obese status among persons with class II obesity. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43(7):628–632.
7.
SwiftJAChoiEPuhlRMGlazebrookC. Talking about obesity with clients: Preferred terms and communication styles of UK pre-registration dieticians, doctors, and nurses. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(2):186–191.
8.
VolgerSVetterMLDoughertyM. Patients’ preferred terms for describing their excess weight: discussing obesity in clinical practice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(1):147–150.
9.
WaddenTADidieE. What’s in a name? Patients’ preferred terms for describing obesity. Obes Res. 2003;11(9):1140–1146.
10.
AtlantisEBallK. Association between weight perception and psychological distress. Int J Obes. 2007;32(4):715–721.
11.
PuhlRMHeuerCA. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 2009;17(5):941–964.
12.
TeixeiraMEBuddGM. Obesity stigma: a newly recognized barrier to comprehensive and effective type 2 diabetes management. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010;22(10):527–533.
13.
OgdenJEvansC. The problem with weighing: effects on mood, self-esteem and body image. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20(3):272–277.
14.
PuhlRMLatnerJD. Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):557–580.
15.
GrabeSHydeJS. Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(4):622–640.
16.
YatesAEdmanJArugueteM. Ethnic differences in BMI and body/self-dissatisfaction among Whites, Asian subgroups, Pacific Islanders, and African-Americans. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34(4):300–307.
17.
AkanGEGriloCM. Sociocultural influences on eating attitudes and behaviors, body image, and psychological functioning: a comparison of African-American, Asian-American, and Caucasian college women. Int J Eat Disord. 1995;18(2):181–187.
18.
LatnerJDKnightTIllingworthK. Body image and self-esteem among Asian, Pacific Islander, and White college students in Hawaii and Australia. Eat Disord. 2011;19(4):355–368.
19.
CashTFHenryPE. Women’s body images: the results of a national survey in the USA. Sex Roles. 1995;33(1-2):19–28.
20.
PuhlRBrownellKD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(12):788–805.
21.
GarnerDMOlmsteadMPBohrYGarfinkelPE. The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med. 1982;12(4):871–878.
22.
CohenJ. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159.
23.
CashTFFlemingECAlindoganJSteadmanLWhiteheadA. Beyond body image as a trait: the development and validation of the Body Image States Scale. Eat Disord. 2002;10(2):103–113.
24.
StunkardAJSorensenTSchlusingerF. Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. In: KetySS, ed. The Genetics of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. New York, NY: Raven; 1983: 115–120.
25.
DursoLELatnerJD. Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalization scale. Obesity. 2008;16(2):S80–S86.
26.
PearlRLPuhlRM. Measuring internalized weight attitudes across body weight categories: validation of the modified weight bias internalization scale. Body Image. 2014;11(1):89–92.
27.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–1070.
28.
WareJEJrKosinskiMKellerSD.A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233.
29.
FrenchSAPerryCLLeonGRFulkersonJA. Dieting behaviors and weight change history in female adolescents. Health Psychol. 1995;14(6):548–555.
30.
HubertyCJMorrisJD. Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychol Bull. 1989;105(2):302–308.
31.
BefortCARickardKM. Gender similarities in response to figure-size feedback in a selected nonclinical population. Sex Roles. 2003;49(1-2):71–80.
32.
HeinbergLJThompsonJK. The effects of figure size feedback (positive vs. negative) and target comparison group (particularistic vs. universalistic) on body image disturbance. Int J Eat Disord. 1992;12(4):441–448.
33.
McFarlaneTPolivyJHermanCP. Effects of false weight feedback on mood, self-evaluation, and food intake in restrained and unrestrained eaters. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998;107(2):312–318.
34.
DursoLELatnerJDHayashiK. Perceived discrimination is associated with binge eating in a community sample of non-overweight, overweight, and obese adults. Obes Facts. 2012;5:869–880.
35.
AmyNAalborgALyonsPKeranenL. Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women. Int J Obes. 2005;30(1):147–155.
36.
LatnerJDBarileJPDursoLEO’BrienKS. Weight and health-related quality of life: the moderating role of weight discrimination and internalized weight bias. Eat Behav. 2014;15(4):586–590.
