Overcoming Challenges to Adopting Smoke-Free Multi-Unit Housing Policies in a Large U.S. Metropolitan Area: Insights and Recommendations From Affected Groups in 20 Los Angeles County Cities
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online March, 2025
Overcoming Challenges to Adopting Smoke-Free Multi-Unit Housing Policies in a Large U.S. Metropolitan Area: Insights and Recommendations From Affected Groups in 20 Los Angeles County Cities
Community members and non-academic partners (“affected groups”) were asked to identify factors that can influence public support, impede adoption, and mitigate challenges related to adopting local smoke-free multi-unit housing policies.
Approach
A series of key informant interviews were conducted with affected groups from a large U.S. metropolitan area.
Setting
20 cities in Los Angeles County without a smoke-free multi-unit housing ordinance.
Participants
Interviewees were recruited from affected groups with knowledge about their community’s civic and political landscape (n = 63).
Method
Data were collected and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify, code and compare themes.
Results
Most interviewees indicated civic groups, those who do not smoke, and/or groups who are educated about the negative health effects of secondhand smoke exposure would be more likely to support smoke-free multi-unit housing policies. Interviewees reported several challenges to policy adoption, including competing city priorities, public disengagement, and the cost and social burden of enforcing these ordinances. To overcome them, interviewees recommended working synergistically with local governments to build diverse coalitions, educate the public, and develop clear enforcement plans.
Conclusion
Insights and recommendations from affected groups in 20 U.S. cities suggest that communicating with the public and priming impacted communities to support smoke-free multi-unit housing policies are promising interventions for protecting at-risk families from secondhand smoke exposure in their homes.
United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2006.
2.
TanCEGlantzSA. Association between smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for cardiac, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2012;126(18):2177-2183. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.121301
3.
KlassenACLeeNLPankiewiczA, et al.Secondhand smoke exposure and smoke-free policy in Philadelphia public housing. Tob Regul Sci. 2017;3(2):192-203. doi:10.18001/trs.3.2.7
4.
KingsburyJHReckingerD. Clearing the air: smoke-free housing policies, smoking, and secondhand smoke exposure among affordable housing residents in Minnesota, 2014-2015. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13(8):E111. doi:10.5888/pcd13.160195
5.
ChuAKKaufmanPChaitonM. Prevalence of involuntary environmental cannabis and tobacco smoke exposure in multi-unit housing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):3332. doi:10.3390/ijerph16183332
6.
MengYYRahmanTHanayaD, et al.Unequal protection: secondhand smoke Threatens health of tenants in multi-unit housing in Los Angeles. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. 2016(PB2016-2):1-8.
7.
Delgado RendonACruzTBBaezconde-GarbanatiLSotoCUngerJB. Managers’ practices of tobacco and marijuana smoking policies in Hispanic-occupied multiunit housing. Health Equity. 2019;3(1):304-311. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0100
8.
HafezAYGonzalezMKulikMCVijayaraghavanMGlantzSA. Uneven access to smoke-free laws and policies and its effect on health equity in the United States: 2000-2019. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(11):1568-1575. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305289
9.
KingBATraversMJCummingsKMMahoneyMCHylandAJ. Secondhand smoke transfer in multiunit housing. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(11):1133-1141. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq162
10.
DacuntoPJChengKCAcevedo-BoltonV, et al.Identifying and quantifying secondhand smoke in source and receptor rooms: Logistic regression and chemical mass balance approaches. Indoor Air. 2014;24(1):59-70. doi:10.1111/ina.12049
11.
2018 Los Angeles County Health Survey. Office of health assessment and Epidemiology. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. 2018.
12.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Instituting smoke-free housing. Federal Register. PublishedOctober 5, 2016. AccessedJuly 10, 2023. https://www.regulations.gov/
PizacaniBAMaherJERohdeKDrachLStarkMJ. Implementation of a smoke-free policy in subsidized multiunit housing: effects on smoking cessation and secondhand smoke exposure. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(9):1027-1034. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr334
16.
OngMKDiamantALZhouQParkHYKaplanRM. Estimates of smoking-related property costs in California multiunit housing. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(3):490-493. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300170
17.
WilburRESteinAHPinzonEMAhmedOSMcNairOSRibislKM. Smoke-free multiunit housing policy: Caretakers’ perspectives on economic and personal impacts. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(7):8092-8102. doi:10.3390/ijerph120708092
18.
KaufmanPKangJKennedyRDBeckPFerrenceR. Impact of smoke-free housing policy lease exemptions on compliance, enforcement and smoking behavior: a qualitative study. Prev Med Rep. 2018;10:29-36. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.011
19.
HernándezDSwopeCBAzuoguCSiegelEGiovencoDP. ‘If I pay rent, I’m gonna smoke’: insights on the social contract of smokefree housing policy in affordable housing settings. Health Place. 2019;56:106-117. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.007
20.
KeglerMCLebow-SkelleyELeaJ, et al.A qualitative study of the process of adoption, implementation and enforcement of smoke-free policies in privately-owned affordable housing. BMC Publ Health. 2019;19(1):1071. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7404-y
21.
AnthonyJGoldmanRReesVW, et al.Qualitative assessment of smoke-free policy implementation in low-income housing: Enhancing resident compliance. Am J Health Promot. 2019;33(1):107-117. doi:10.1177/0890117118776090
SuriH. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qual Res J. 2011;11(2):63-75. doi:10.3316/QRJ1102063
24.
WeberRP. Basic content analysis. 1990.
25.
BradleyEHCurryLADeversKJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758-1772. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x
26.
WeberMDSimonPMessexMAragonLKuoTFieldingJE. A framework for mobilizing communities to advance local tobacco control policy: the Los Angeles County experience. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(5):785-788. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300586
27.
HennrikusDPentelPRSandellSD. Preferences and Practices among renters regarding smoking restrictions in apartment buildings. Tob Control. 2003;12(2):189-194. doi:10.1136/tc.12.2.189
28.
QuickBLBatesBRRominaS. Examining antecedents of clean indoor air policy support: implications for campaigns promoting clean indoor air. Health Commun. 2009;24(1):50-59. doi:10.1080/10410230802606992
29.
LichtASKingBATraversMJRivardCHylandAJ. Attitudes, experiences, and acceptance of smoke-free policies among US multiunit housing residents. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(10):1868-1871. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300717
30.
Baezconde-GarbanatiLAWeich-ReushéKEspinozaL, et al.Secondhand smoke exposure among hispanics/latinos living in multiunit housing: Exploring barriers to new policies. Am J Health Promot. 2011;25(5 Suppl):S82-S90. doi:10.4278/ajhp.100628-QUAL-219
BergCJHaardörferRWindleMSolomonMKeglerMC. Smoke-free policies in multiunit housing: smoking behavior and reactions to messaging strategies in support or in opposition. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12(6):E98. doi:10.5888/pcd12.140479
33.
GaliatsatosPKoehlRCaufield-NollC, et al.Proposal for smoke-free public housing: a systematic review of attitudes and preferences from residents of multi-unit housing. J Public Health Policy. 2020;41(4):496-514. doi:10.1057/s41271-020-00236-z
34.
PatelMDonovanEMLiuMSolomon-MaynardMSchilloBS. Policy support for smoke-free and e-cigarette free multiunit housing. Am J Health Promot. 2022;36(1):106-116. doi:10.1177/08901171211035210
35.
WangTWLemosPRMcNabbSKingBA. Attitudes toward smoke-free public housing among U.S. adults, 2016. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(1):113-118. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.026
36.
EscofferyCBundyLCarvalhoM, et al.Third-hand smoke as a potential intervention message for promoting smoke-free homes in low-income communities. Health Educ Res. 2013;28(5):923-930. doi:10.1093/her/cyt056
