Evaluating the Acceptability and Impact of an Online,Lifestyle-Based Mental Well-Being Initiative Targeting School Communities in New York State – Lifting the School Community Project
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2025
Evaluating the Acceptability and Impact of an Online,Lifestyle-Based Mental Well-Being Initiative Targeting School Communities in New York State – Lifting the School Community Project
To determine the acceptability and impact of an online, lifestyle-based mental well-being initiative in a school-based setting.
Approach
A post-program evaluation survey was administered after the intervention.
Setting
Fifty-seven New York State school districts.
Participants
Participating school districts invited all employees and community members to register for the intervention. A total of 4083 individuals participated, with 1060 (26%) responding to the post-program survey.
Intervention
The 7-week intervention (The Lift Project) incorporated strategies from lifestyle medicine, positive psychology and neuroscience literature. The ten lessons included online, video-based content and related experiential learning exercises.
Methods
The post-program survey included Likert items that evaluated the participants’ perceived program acceptability, mental health enhancement, self-efficacy, and skill acquisition. Inductive thematic qualitative analysis assessed the participants’ likes and dislikes concerning the initiative.
Results
A high percentage of respondents indicated that the program improved their well-being (85%), enhanced their well-being-related self-efficacy (92%), and provided them with skills for supporting their long-term mental well-being (82%). Respondents liked the evidence-based, engaging content and design elements and the focus on personal well-being, community connection, and practical applicability. Some respondents desired more social connection, disliked certain design elements, lacked time and experienced technical issues.
Conclusion
The initiative was acceptable and impactful, indicating that school districts may serve as an effective network for addressing the mental health epidemic.
QureshiNABhandariSSDi LorenzoGSampathH. Editorial: mental health promotion and protection. Front Psychiatr. 2023;14:1161358. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1161358
2.
FountoulakisKNKarakatsoulisGAbrahamS, et al.Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2022;54:21-40. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.10.004
3.
World Health Organization. World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
4.
TrivediJKTripathiADhanasekaranSMoussaouiD. Preventive psychiatry: concept appraisal and future directions. Int J Soc Psychiatr. 2014;60(4):321-329. doi:10.1177/0020764013488570
5.
SinghVKumarAGuptaS. Mental health prevention and promotion-a narrative review. Front Psychiatr. 2022;13:898009. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.898009
6.
SteinerEDWooA. Job-related stress threatens the teacher supply: key findings from the 2021 State of the U.S. In: Teacher Survey. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2021.
7.
CastilloEGIjadi-MaghsoodiRShadravanS, et al.Community interventions to promote mental health and social equity. Curr Psychiatr Rep. 2019;21(5):35. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1017-0
8.
LeLKEsturasACMihalopoulosC, et al.Cost-effectiveness evidence of mental health prevention and promotion interventions: a systematic review of economic evaluations. PLoS Med. 2021;18(5):e1003606. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003606
9.
SharmaASharmaSDSharmaM. Mental health promotion: a narrative review of emerging trends. Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2017;30(5):339-345. doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000347
10.
O'BrienBCHarrisIBBeckmanTJReedDACookDA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245-1251. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000388
11.
MortonDPHinzeJCraigB, et al.A multimodal intervention for improving the mental health and emotional well-being of college students. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020;14(2):216-224. doi:10.1177/1559827617733941
12.
HinzeJMortonD. Well-being education for educators. TEACH J Christian Educ. 2017;11(2):50-57.
13.
RenfrewMEMortonDPMortonJKHinzeJSPrzybylkoGCraigBA. The influence of three modes of human support on attrition and adherence to a Web- and mobile app–based mental health promotion intervention in a nonclinical cohort: randomized comparative study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e19945. doi:10.2196/19945
14.
RenfrewMEMortonDPNorthcoteMMortonJKHinzeJSPrzybylkoG. Participant perceptions of facilitators and barriers to adherence in a digital mental health intervention for a nonclinical cohort: content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e25358. doi:10.2196/25358
15.
RenfrewMEMortonDPMortonJK, et al.A Web-and mobile app–based mental health promotion intervention comparing email, short message service, and videoconferencing support for a healthy cohort: randomized comparative study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(1):e15592. doi:10.2196/15592
16.
PrzybylkoGMortonDKentL, et al.The effectiveness of an online interdisciplinary intervention for mental health promotion: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):77. doi:10.1186/s40359-021-00577-8
17.
PrzybylkoGMortonDMortonJRenfrewM. The Influence of gender and age on the outcomes of and adherence to a digital interdisciplinary mental health promotion intervention in an Australasian nonclinical setting: cohort study. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(11):e29866. doi:10.2196/29866
18.
PrzybylkoGMortonDPMortonJKRenfrewMEHinzeJ. An interdisciplinary mental well-being intervention for increasing flourishing: two experimental studies. J Posit Psychol. 2021;17:573-588. doi:10.1080/17439760.2021.1897868
19.
MortonDRenfrewMMatthewsS. The ACLM lift project-caring for the carers. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023;17(1_suppl):74. doi:10.1177/15598276221128370
20.
Oakes-CornellissenAMortonDRankinPRenfrewM. Efficacy of a multimodal lifestyle intervention (The Lift Project) for improving the mental health of individuals with an affective mood disorder living in South Africa. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1127068. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127068
21.
CarolanSde VisserRO. Employees’ perspectives on the facilitators and barriers to engaging with digital mental health interventions in the workplace: qualitative study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(1):e8. doi:10.2196/mental.9146
22.
CarolanSHarrisPRCavanaghK. Improving employee well-being and effectiveness: systematic review and meta-analysis of Web-based psychological interventions delivered in the workplace. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(7):e271. doi:10.2196/jmir.7583
23.
BrameCJ. Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):es6. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
24.
SwellerJ. Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learn Indiv Differ. 2024;110:102423. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423
25.
ColasanteM. Not drowning, waving: the role of video in a renewed digital learning world. Australas J Educ Technol. 2022;38(4):176-189. doi:10.14742/ajet.7915
26.
CacioppoJTCacioppoS. The growing problem of loneliness. Lancet. 2018;391(10119):426. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30142-9
27.
CacioppoJTCacioppoS. Social relationships and health: the toxic effects of perceived social isolation. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2014;8(2):58-72. doi:10.1111/spc3.12087
28.
Holt-LunstadJ. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors: the power of social connection in prevention. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(5):567-573. doi:10.1177/15598276211009454
29.
Holt-LunstadJ. Social connection as a public health issue: the evidence and a systemic framework for prioritizing the “social” in social determinants of health. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2022;43:193-213. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-110732
30.
SantarossaSKaneDSennCYWoodruffSJ. Exploring the role of in-person components for online health behavior change interventions: can a digital person-to-person component suffice?J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4):e144. doi:10.2196/jmir.8480
31.
StrandMEngLSGammonD. Combining online and offline peer support groups in community mental health care settings: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13033-020-00370-x
32.
ClarkJLAlgoeSBGreenMC. Social network sites and well-being: the role of social connection. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018;27(1):32-37. doi:10.1177/0963721417730833
33.
AndersonLMAdeneyKLShinnCSafranekSBuckner-BrownJKrauseLK. Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(6):Cd009905. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2
34.
RileyCRoyBLamV, et al.Can a collective-impact initiative improve well-being in three US communities? Findings from a prospective repeated cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e048378. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048378
35.
MorganK. Libraries as public health partners in the opioid crisis. In: Williams-CockfieldKCMehraB, eds. How Public Libraries Build Sustainable Communities in the 21st Century. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2023:53:219-228.
36.
LowensteinMFeuerstein-SimonRSheniR, et al.Public libraries as partners in confronting the overdose crisis: a qualitative analysis. Subst Abuse. 2021;42(3):1-8. doi:10.1080/08897077.2019.1691129
37.
PowellTWSmithBDOffiongA, et al.Public librarians: partners in adolescent health promotion. Publ Libr Q. 2023;42(4):361-372. doi:10.1080/01616846.2022.2107349
38.
WatersLAGalichetBOwenNEakinE. Who participates in physical activity intervention trials?J Phys Activ Health. 2011;8(1):85-103. doi:10.1123/jpah.8.1.85
39.
MitchellJStanimirovicRKleinBVella-BrodrickD. A randomised controlled trial of a self-guided internet intervention promoting well-being. Comput Hum Behav. 2009;25(3):749-760. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.003
40.
SeatonCLBottorffJLJones-BrickerMOliffeJLDeLeenheerDMedhurstK. Men’s mental health promotion interventions: a scoping review. Am J Men's Health. 2017;11(6):1823-1837. doi:10.1177/1557988317728353
