Urban-Rural Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participation

Abstract

Purpose

This research investigates the perceived benefits and challenges of participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among households with young children across urban and rural Nebraska, aiming to address the limited exploration of disparities in its reach.

Design

Cross-Sectional (SNAP-Ed Needs and Assets Assessment).

Setting

Households across Nebraska.

Participants

Low-income families with at least 1 child aged 6 or younger (n = 1040).

Measures

Perceived benefits and challenges to SNAP participation across urban-rural populations, controlling for race, income, and education.

Analysis

Chi-square tests and logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.

Results

Overall, financial need was perceived as the top reported benefit, while time and efforts for recertification were the top challenge. Rural residents perceived financial need (P < 001) and ability to have enough healthy food (P < 05) as major drivers for SNAP enrollment, whereas urban residents perceived previous SNAP-Ed participation (P < 001) and positive peer influence (P < 01) as benefits. Rural respondents perceived greater challenges in SNAP application requiring more time and effort (P < 001), while urban respondents had significantly higher concerns about native language accessibility (P < 001), poor customer service (P < 05), and unwillingness to depend on government agencies (P < 05).

Conclusion

Geographically and culturally tailored SNAP-Ed interventions and streamlined application processes are required to address the urban-rural disparities.

Keywords

SNAP SNAP-Ed urban rural perceived benefits and challenges

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Toossi

Jones

. The food and nutrition assistance landscape: fiscal year 2022 annual report. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2023, Report No. EIB-255. doi:10.32747/2023.8054020.ers

Bailey

Ettinger de Cuba

Cook

March

Coleman

Frank

. Too many hurdles: barriers to receiving SNAP put children's health at risk. Boston: Children’s HealthWatch. 2011: https://childrenshealthwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/BarrierstoSNAP_brief_March2011.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2024.

Cohen

Oatmen

Heisler

, et al. Facilitators and barriers to supplemental nutrition assistance program incentive use: findings from a clinic intervention for low-income patients. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(4):571-579. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.010

Cunnyngham

. Trends in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates: Fiscal Year 2010 to Fiscal Year 2016. Washington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support; 2018.

Keith-Jennings

Llobrera

Dean

. Links of the supplemental nutrition assistance program with food insecurity, poverty, and health: evidence and potential. Am J Publ Health. 2019;109(12):1636-1640. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305325

United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service . Rural economy. Published February 29 2024. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/rural-economy/. Accessed August 10, 2024.

Schanzenbach

. SNAP Supports Rural Families. Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute; 2022: https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/SNAP-Supports-Rural-Families.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2024.

Waxman

Gupta

. SNAP Benefits Remained Too Low to Help Families Afford Food in 2023 the Latest Data on the Gap between SNAP Benefits and Meal Costs. Urban Institute; 2024: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/SNAP-Benefits-Remained-Too-Low-to-Help-Families-Afford-Food-in-2023.pdf

Haynes-Maslow

Hardison-Moody

Patton-Lopez

, et al. Examining rural food-insecure families’ perceptions of the supplemental nutrition assistance program: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17(17):6390. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176390

10.

McCarthy

Cho

Jackson

Sauza

Martinez

Calderon

. Barriers to utilization of the supplemental nutrition assistance program (CalFresh) in Los Angeles county. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(9):A91. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.331

11.

Gaines-Turner

Simmons

Chilton

. Recommendations from SNAP participants to improve wages and end stigma. Am J Publ Health. 2019;109(12):1664-1667. doi:10.2105/ajph.2019.305362

12.

Cheng

Tang

. SNAP out of it: a study of low-income families’ underutilization of food stamps. J Poverty. 2016;20(2):152-167. doi:10.1080/10875549.2015.1094765

13.

Purtell

Gershoff

Aber

. Low income families’ utilization of the federal “safety net”: individual and state-level predictors of TANF and food stamp receipt. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34(4):713-724. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.016

14.

Pinard

Bertmann

FMW

Byker

, et al. What factors influence SNAP participation? Literature reflecting enrollment in food assistance programs from a social and behavioral science perspective. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2017;12(2):151-168. doi:10.1080/19320248.2016.1146194

15.

Martinez

Singh

Esaryk

Ritchie

. SNAP student rules are not so snappy: lessons learned from a qualitative study of California county agency workers. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024;56(3):133-144. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2023.12.004

16.

Meza

Tester

Yen

Laraia

Wolfson

Leung

. Perceptions of SNAP and stocking standards: a qualitative study of California small food store owners and managers. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):752. doi:10.3390/nu13030752

17.

Avila

Burns

Bolcic-Jankovic

, et al. Barriers to SNAP. Boston: Project Bread; 2021. https://projectbread.org/uploads/attachments/ckrupoiyh0lbsgl9havs9lxj2-boston-snap-survey-research-brief-2021.pdf

18.

Louie

Kim

Chan

. Perceptions and barriers to SNAP utilization among asian and pacific islanders in greater los angeles. Am J Health Promot. 2020;34(7):779-790. doi:10.1177/0890117120925746

19.

Hunger Free America and CUNY Urban Food Policy Institute . SNAP declines yet hunger persists: NYC caseloads 2012–2016 and the need to ease access to benefits, 2018. https://cunyurbanfoodpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/1529431598-DecliningSNAPParticipationReportMay132018.pd_.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2023.

20.

Purkait

Dev

Fischer

Behrends

Sehi

Franzen-Castle

. Perceived benefits and challenges of SNAP participation across urban and rural population. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024;56(8):S31-S32. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.077

21.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Nebraska supplemental nutrition assistance program. 2023. Published February 13. https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/snap_factsheet_nebraska.pdf. Accessed June 7, 2024.

22.

Leung

Wolfson

. Perspectives from supplemental nutrition assistance program participants on improving SNAP policy. Health Equity. 2019;3(1):81-85. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0094

23.

Leung

Blumenthal

Hoffnagle

, et al. Associations of food stamp participation with dietary quality and obesity in children. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):463-472. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0889

24.

Insolera

Cohen

Wolfson

. SNAP and WIC participation during childhood and food security in adulthood, 1984-2019. Am J Publ Health. 2022;112(10):1498-1506. doi:10.2105/ajph.2022.306967

25.

Friedman

. Simplified determinations of statistical power, magnitude of effect and research sample sizes. Educ Psychol Meas. 1982;42(2):521-526.

26.

Cohen

. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

27.

USDA ERS - Food Security in the U.S.: Measurement. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/measurement/. Accessed December 17, 2023.

28.

USDA ERS - Rural-Urban

Continuum Codes. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes/. Accessed December 11, 2023.

29.

Willis

. Cognitive Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005.

30.

Kaiser

. Why do low-income women not use food stamps? Findings from the California Women’s Health Survey. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11(12):1288-1295. doi:10.1017/s1368980008002528

31.

Algert

Reibel

Renvall

. Barriers to participation in the food stamp program among food pantry clients in los angeles. Am J Publ Health. 2006;96(5):807-809. doi:10.2105/ajph.2005.066977

32.

Grieger

Danziger

. Who receives food stamps during adulthood? Analyzing repeatable events with incomplete event histories. Demography. 2011;48(4):1601-1614. doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0056-x

33.

Mabli

. SNAP participation and urban and rural food security. Alexandria: Mathematica Policy Research for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. 2014. https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/SNAPFS_UrbanRural.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2024.

34.

Fiol

Waxman

Gundersen

. Persistent Gaps in SNAP Benefit Adequacy across the Rural-Urban Continuum. Urban Institute; 2021. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/105010/persistent-gaps-in-snap-benefit-adequacy-across-the-rural-urban-continuum_0.pdf

35.

Vogt

. Financial impacts of the pandemic in rural Nebraska. In: CAP Series 21-1004. Lincoln: Center for Agricultural Profitability, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

36.

Byker Shanks

Andress

Hardison-Moody

, et al. Food insecurity in the rural United States: an examination of struggles and coping mechanisms to feed a family among households with a low-income. Nutrients. 2022;14(24):5250. doi:10.3390/nu14245250

37.

Wende

Meyer

MRU

Abildso

Davis

Kaczynski

. Urban‐rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: application of differing rural definitions. J Rural Health. 2023;39(1):121-135. doi:10.1111/jrh.12677

38.

Wen

Fan

Kowaleski-Jones

Wan

. Rural–urban disparities in obesity prevalence among working age adults in the United States: exploring the mechanisms. Am J Health Promot. 2018;32(2):400-408. doi:10.1177/0890117116689488

39.

Walker

Keane

Burke

. Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: a review of food deserts literature. Health Place. 2010;16(5):876-884. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.013

40.

Larson

Story

Nelson

. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:74-81.e10. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.025

41.

Crouch

Abshire

Wirth

Hung

Benavidez

. Rural-urban differences in overweight and obesity, physical activity, and food security among children and adolescents. Prev Chronic Dis. 2023;20:E92. doi:10.5888/pcd20.230136

42.

Contreras

Martoccio

Brophy-Herb

, et al. Rural–urban differences in body mass index and obesity-related behaviors among low-income preschoolers. J Public Health. 2021;43(4):e637-e644. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdaa162

43.

Johnson

. Urban-rural differences in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Obes. 2015;11(3):233-241. doi:10.1089/chi.2014.0085

44.

United States Department of Agriculture - Food and Nutrition Service . What Can SNAP Buy? USDA-FNS. Published April 14, 2021. https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligible-food-items. Accessed August 14, 2024.

45.

Parks

Han

Fricke

Parker

Hesterman

Yaroch

. Reducing food insecurity and improving fruit and vegetable intake through a nutrition incentive program in Michigan, USA. SSM Popul Health. 2021;15:100898. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100898

46.

Wielenga

Franzen-Castle

Toney

Dingman

. Nebraska Double up food Bucks increases purchases of fresh fruits and vegetables among SNAP users. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020;4(Supplement_2):731. doi:10.1093/cdn/nzaa051_028

47.

Lyerly

Rummo

Amin

, et al. Effectiveness of mobile produce markets in increasing access and affordability of fruits and vegetables among low-income seniors. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(17):1-10. doi:10.1017/s1368980020002931

48.

Andrews

Smallwood

. What’s behind the rise in SNAP participation? Amber Waves. 2012;10(1):1-6.

49.

Office of Management and Budget - Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs . Strategies for reducing administrative burden in public benefit and service programs, 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/BurdenReductionStrategies.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2024.

50.

Rosenbaum

Bergh

. SNAP includes extensive payment accuracy system performance measures should also emphasize access, customer service. Washington: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; 2024. https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-includes-extensive-payment-accuracy-system. Accessed June 28, 2024.

51.

Henning-Smith

Moscovice

Kozhimannil

. Differences in social isolation and its relationship to health by rurality. J Rural Health. 2019;35(4):540-549. doi:10.1111/jrh.12344

52.

U.S. Department of Agriculture - Food and Nutrition Service. Supplemental nutrition assistance program guidance on non-citizen eligibility, 2011. https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Non-Citizen_Guidance_063011.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2024.

53.

Anthone

Medinger

Rodriguez

. Nebraska minority population report card, 2020; p. 7. https://dhhs.ne.gov/Reports/MinorityPopulationReportCard.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2024.

54.

United States Department of Agriculture- Food and Nutrition Service . Ensuring Language access for limited English proficient (LEP) individuals and effective communication for individuals with disabilities in consideration of the recent unwinding of the supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) emergency allotments (EA) and upcoming unwinding of COVID-19- program flexibilities, 2023. Published. https://www.fns.usda.gov/cr/unwinding-snap-ea. Accessed June 27, 2024.