To assess the acceptability and feasibility of the Phoenix smoking cessation smartphone app in people who smoke and are not yet ready to quit.
Approach/Design
Post-intervention telephone interview.
Setting
Oklahoma and Texas.
Participants
Adults who were not ready to quit smoking at baseline (71% female, 76% White, mean age 52.6 years).
Intervention
This 26-week 3-arm randomized controlled trial examined the utility of the Phoenix app which encouraged and provided support for smoking cessation attempts through twice-daily messages and weekly surveys.
Methods
Participants (100/152) completed an audio-recorded interview that assessed app engagement including benefits, barriers, most useful features, and suggested app modifications. Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed for themes.
Results
Adults who were not ready to quit smoking experienced few barriers to using Phoenix app content, and reported increased self-reflection, awareness of smoking behaviors, and motivation to quit smoking in response to the tailored messages and weekly assessments. Participants with less control over daily schedules wanted more access to missed messages and surveys. Messages and surveys were helpful, but participants suggested increasing the variety of message and survey content.
Conclusion
Adults not yet ready to quit smoking are receptive to using mHealth smoking cessation apps to reduce/quit smoking. mHealth applications can increase access to evidence-based smoking cessation interventions and may be an effective tool for reducing smoking disparities.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking - 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
2.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Smoking Cessation. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2020.
3.
HarrisKJBradley-EwingAGogginK, et al.Recruiting unmotivated smokers into a smoking induction trial. Health Educ Res. 2016;31(3):363-374. doi:10.1093/her/cyw018
4.
BabbSMalarcherASchauerGAsmanKJamalA. Quitting smoking among adults — United States, 2000–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;65(52):1457–1464. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6552a1
5.
HerzogTPokhrelPKawamotoCT. Short-term fluctuations in motivation to quit smoking in a sample of smokers in Hawaii. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(2):236-241. doi:10.3109/10826084.2014.966846
6.
AliAKaplanCMDerefinkoKJKlesgesRC. Smoking cessation for smokers not ready to quit: meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(2):253-262. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.021
7.
SteinbergMLRosenRLVersellaMVBorgesALeyroTM. A pilot randomized clinical trial of brief interventions to encourage quit attempts in smokers from socioeconomic disadvantage. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(9):1500-1508. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntaa047
BrewerLCFortunaKLJonesC, et al.Back to the future: achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(1):e14512. doi:10.2196/14512
10.
GrundyQ. A review of the quality and impact of mobile health apps. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022;43(1):117-134. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-103738
11.
CarreiroSNewcombMLeachROstrowskiSBoudreauxEDAmanteD. Current reporting of usability and impact of mHealth interventions for substance use disorder: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;215:108201. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108201
12.
MonneyGPenzenstadlerLDuprazOEtterJ-FKhazaalY. mHealth app for cannabis users: satisfaction and perceived usefulness. Front Psychiatr. 2015;6:120. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00120
13.
McClureJBHeffnerJHohlSKlasnjaPCatzSL. Design considerations for mHealth programs targeting smokers not yet ready to quit: results of a sequential mixed-methods study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(3):e31. doi:10.2196/mhealth.6845
14.
SmithALCarterSMChapmanSDunlopSMFreemanB. Why do smokers try to quit without medication or counselling? A qualitative study with ex-smokers. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e007301. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007301
15.
HeffnerJLCatzSLKlasnjaPTiffanyBMcClureJB. Development of a mobile health intervention with personal experiments for smokers who are ambivalent about quitting: formative design and testing. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4(8):e21784. doi:10.2196/21784
16.
HawkinsRPKreuterMResnicowKFishbeinMDijkstraA. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(3):454-466. doi:10.1093/her/cyn004
17.
Institute of Medicine. Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2002.
18.
HoeppnerBBHoeppnerSSSeaboyerL, et al.How smart are smartphone apps for smoking cessation? A content analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;18(5):1025-1031. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv117
19.
DouglasNFreeC. Someone batting in my corner: experiences of smoking-cessation support via text message. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(616):e768-e776. doi:10.3399/bjgp13X674459
20.
BusinelleMSBensonLHébertET, et al.Project phoenix: Pilot randomized controlled trial of a smartphone-delivered intervention for people who are not ready to quit smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024;260:111351. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111351
21.
BakerTBMermelsteinRCollinsLM, et al.New methods for tobacco dependence treatment research. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(2):192-207. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9252-y
22.
WestRSohalT. “Catastrophic” pathways to smoking cessation: findings from national survey. BMJ. 2006;332(7539):458-460. doi:10.1136/bmj.38723.573866.AE
23.
UlmCChenSFleshmanB, et al.Smartphone-based survey and message compliance in adults initially unready to quit smoking: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form Res. 2024;8:e56003. doi:10.2196/56003
24.
BenowitzNLBernertJTFouldsJ, et al.Biochemical verification of tobacco use and abstinence: 2019 update. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;22(7):1086-1097. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz132
25.
AbramsDNiauraRSBrownRAEmmonsKMGoldsteinMGMontiP. The Tobacco Dependence Treatment Handbook: A Guide to Best Practices. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.
26.
CaseyMHayesPSGlynnF, et al.Patients' experiences of using a smartphone application to increase physical activity: the SMART MOVE qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(625):e500-e508. doi:10.3399/bjgp14X680989
PattonMQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; 2014.
29.
SaldañaJ. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed.London: Sage Publications; 2013.
30.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJ. Qualitative Data Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc; 2014.
31.
AdnanAIrvineREWilliamsAHarrisMAntonacciG. Improving acceptability of mHealth apps—the use of the technology acceptance Model to assess the acceptability of mHealth apps: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e66432. doi:10.2196/66432
32.
CheneyMKAlexanderACGareyL, et al.Adapting a mobile health app for smoking cessation in black adults with anxiety through an analysis of the mobile anxiety sensitivity program proof-of-concept trial: qualitative study. JMIR Form Res. 2025;9:e53566. doi:10.2196/53566
33.
StevensERLiRXiangG, et al.Trial participants’ perceptions of the impact of ecological momentary assessment on smoking behaviors: qualitative analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024;12:e52122. doi:10.2196/52122
34.
CallePShaoRLiuY, et al.Towards AI-driven healthcare: systematic optimization, linguistic analysis, and clinicians’ evaluation of large language models for smoking cessation interventions. Presented at: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Honolulu, HI, USA, 2024, 2024. doi:10.1145/3613904.3641965
35.
NagawaCSFaroJMMenonAJ, et al.Written advice given by African American smokers to their peers: qualitative study of motivational messages. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(4):e21481. doi:10.2196/21481
36.
Barroso-HurtadoMSuárez-CastroDMartínez-VispoCBecoñaELópez-DuránA. Smoking cessation apps: a systematic review of format, outcomes, and features. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11664.
37.
Nahum-ShaniISmithSNSpringBJ, et al.Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann Behav Med. 2017;52(6):446-462. doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8
38.
NowelsMAMcDarbyMBrodyL, et al.Predictors of engagement in multiple modalities of digital mental health treatments: longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e48696. doi:10.2196/48696
39.
KipHWentzelJKeldersSM. Shaping blended care: adapting an instrument to support therapists in using eMental health. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(11):e24245. doi:10.2196/24245
40.
MorseJM. Determining sample size. Qual Health Res. 2000;10(1):3-5.
