Causality orientations theory, a key sub-theory of self-determination theory, identifies three distinct causality orientations: autonomy, control, and impersonal orientation. The theory proposes generalized effects of the orientations on motivation and behavior. We meta-analyzed studies (k = 83) testing relations between causality orientations, forms of motivation from self-determination theory, and behavior. Pooled data were used to test a process model in which autonomous and controlled forms of motivation mediated relations between causality orientations and behavior. Results revealed that autonomy and control orientations were positively correlated with autonomous and controlled forms of motivation, respectively. Impersonal orientation was correlated negatively with autonomy orientation and autonomous forms of motivation, and positively with control orientation and controlled forms of motivation. Process model tests revealed total effects of autonomy orientation on behavior, comprising direct and indirect effects through autonomous motivation, and a positive direct effect of control orientation on behavior and a negative indirect effect through controlled motivation, resulting in a zero total effect. Analysis of age, gender, behavior type, study design, and study quality revealed few moderator effects on model relations. Findings support effects of autonomy orientation on motivation and behavior, and the processes involved, and identify constructs that could be targeted, or circumvented, in behavioral interventions.
AdamsN.LittleT. D.RyanR. M. (2017). Self-determination theory. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.LopezS. J.(Eds.),Development of self-determination through the life-course (pp. 47–54).
Springer.
AndersonS.NeroF.RodinJ.DiamondM.DecherneyA. (1989).
Coping patterns of in vitro fertilization nurse coordinators: Strategies for combating low outcome effectance. Psychology & Health,
3(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870448908400382
4.
AssadiV.HassaneinK. (2014). General causality orientations and the adoption of integrated persona health records systems: A latent class analysis with distal outcomes. [Paper presentation] 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science,
Honolulu,
Hawaii.
5.
BagozziR. P.KimmelS. K. (1995).
A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal directed behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology,
34, 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01076.x
BartholomewK. J.NtoumanisN.RyanR. M.BoschJ. A.Thogersen-NtoumaniC. (2011).
Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
37(11), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125
8.
BoberS.GrolnickW. (1995).
Motivational factors related to different self-schemas. Motivation and Emotion,
19(4), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02856517
9.
BoggT. (2008).
Conscientiousness, the transtheoretical model of change, and exercise: A neo-socioanalytic integration of trait and social-cognitive frameworks in the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality,
76(4), 775–802. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00504.x
10.
BurtonK. D.LydonJ. E.D'AlessandroD.KoestnerR. (2006).
The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
91, 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750
11.
CarterE. C.SchonbrodtF.GervaisW.HilgardJ. (2019).
Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,
2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196
12.
Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2008). Influences of personality traits and continuation intentions on physical activity participation within the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology and Health, 23(3), 347--367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320601185866
13.
ChatzisarantisN. L. D.HaggerM. S.BiddleS. J. H.SmithB.WangC. K. J. (2003).
A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
25, 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.3.284
14.
ChatzisarantisN. L. D.HaggerM. S.WangC. K. J.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC. (2009).
The effects of social identity and perceived autonomy support on health behaviour within the theory of planned behaviour. Current Psychology,
28(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9043-4
15.
CheungM. W.-L. (2015).
metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology,
5, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521
16.
CheungM. W.-L.HongR. Y. (2017).
Applications of meta-analytic structural equation modeling in health psychology: Examples, issues, and recommendations. Health Psychology Review,
11(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1343678
17.
CicchettiD. V.FeinsteinA. R. (1990).
High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
43(6), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M
CohenJ. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
20.
ConnerM. T.AbrahamC. (2001).
Conscientiousness and the theory of planned behavior: Toward a more complete model of the antecedents of intentions and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
27(11), 1547–1561. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711014
21.
ConnerM. T.NormanP. (2015). Predicting and changing health behaviour: A social cognition approach. In ConnerM. T.NormanP.(Eds.),Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed., pp. 1–29).
Open University Press.
22.
DeciE. L.EghrariH.PatrickB. C.LeoneD. R. (1994).
Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality,
62, 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
23.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985a).
The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality,
19, 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
24.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985b). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
Plenum Press.
25.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000).
The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,
11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
26.
DeciE. L.VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.RyanR. M. (1991).
Motivation in education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist,
26(3–4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
DuriezB. (2011).
The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits revisited: The moderating role of general causality orientation. Personality and Individual Differences,
50(5), 684–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.017
29.
EggerM.SmithD. G.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997).
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ,
315, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
30.
EwingC. J. (2010). Does causality orientation moderate the relationship between assignment choice and academic achievement in air force officers performing the nuclear mission? [PhD. Thesis].
Capella University.
31.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005).
Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
26, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
32.
GwetK. L. (2008).
Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,
61(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/doi:10.1348/000711006X126600
33.
HaggerM. S. (2019).
Habit and physical activity: Theoretical advances, practical implications, and agenda for future research. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
42, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.007
HaggerM. S.CameronL. D.HamiltonK.HankonenN.LintunenT. (Eds.). (2020). The handbook of behavior change.
Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318
36.
HaggerM. S.ChanD. K. C.ProtogerouC.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2016).
Using meta-analytic path analysis to test theoretical predictions in health behavior: An illustration based on meta-analyses of the theory of planned behavior. Preventive Medicine,
89, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.020
37.
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2007). Advances in self-determination theory research in sport and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 597-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.06.003
38.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2011).
Causality orientations moderate the undermining effect of rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
47(1), 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.010
39.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L. D.HarrisJ. (2006).
From psychological need satisfaction to intentional behavior: Testing a motivational sequence in two behavioral contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
32, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279905
40.
HaggerM. S.HankonenN.ChatzisarantisN. L. D.RyanR. M. (2020). Changing behavior using self-determination theory. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (pp. 104–119). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.008
41.
HaggerM. S.KochS.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2015).
The effect of causality orientations and positive competence-enhancing feedback on intrinsic motivation: A test of additive and interactive effects. Personality and Individual Differences,
72, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.012
42.
HaggerM. S.KochS.ChatzisarantisN. L. D.OrbellS. (2017).
The common-sense model of self-regulation: Meta-analysis and test of a process model. Psychological Bulletin,
143(11), 1117–1154. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000118
43.
HaggerM. S.MoyersS.McAnallyK.McKinleyL. E. (2020).
Known knowns and known unknowns on behavior change interventions and mechanisms of action. Health Psychology Review,
14(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1719184
44.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.).
Guildford Press.
45.
HeinV.KokaA.HaggerM. S. (2015).
Relationships between perceived teachers' controlling behaviour, psychological need thwarting, anger and bullying behaviour in high-school students. Journal of Adolescence,
42, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.003
HodginsH. S.KoestnerR.DuncanN. (1996).
On the compatability of autonomy and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
22(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223001
48.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.BureauJ. S. (2017).
Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,
143(12), 1346–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000125
49.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1--55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
50.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Sage.
51.
JangH.ReeveJ.HalusicM. (2016).
A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students' preferred ways. Journal of Experimental Education,
84(4), 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
52.
JerkovićD.RihtarićM. L.KranželićV. (2017).
The moderating role of causality orientations in the relationship between personality traits and cannabis consumption. Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istraživanja,
53, 219–230.
53.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Personality.
Guildford Press.
54.
JohnsonB. T.LowR. E.MacDonaldH. V. (2014).
Panning for the gold in health research: Incorporating studies’ methodological quality in meta-analysis. Psychology & Health,
30(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.953533
55.
KeatleyD. A.ClarkeD. D.HaggerM. S. (2012).
Investigating the predictive validity of implicit and explicit measures of motivation on condom use, physical activity, and healthy eating. Psychology and Health,
27(5), 550–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.605451
56.
KneeC. R.PatrickH.VietorN. A.NanayakkaraA.NeighborsC. (2002).
Self-determination as growth motivation in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
28, 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288005
57.
KneeC. R.ZuckermanM. (1996).
Causality orientations and the disappearance of the self-serving bias. Journal of Research in Personality,
30(1), 6–87. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0005
58.
KneeC. R.ZuckermanM. (1998).
A nondefensive personality: Autonomy and control as moderators of defensive coping and self-handicapping. Journal of Research in Personality,
32(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2207
59.
KoestnerR.BernieriF.ZuckermanM. (1992).
Self-regulation and consistency between attitudes, traits, and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
18, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181008
60.
KoestnerR.LosierG. F. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being internally motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M.(Eds.),Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 101–121).
University of Rochester Press.
61.
KruglanskiA. W.BelangerJ. J.ChenX. Y.KopetzC.PierroA.MannettiL. (2012).
The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review,
119(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025488
62.
LevesqueC. S.PelletierL. G. (2003).
On the investigation of primed and chronic autonomous and heteronomous motivational orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
29, 1570–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256877
63.
LevesqueC. S.WilliamsG. C.ElliotD.PickeringM. A.BodenhamerB.FinleyP. J. (2007).
Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. Health Education Research,
22(5), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl148
64.
MaslowA. (1943).
A theory of human motivation. Psychological Reports,
50, 370–396.
65.
MullanE.MarklandD. A.IngledewD. K. (1997).
A graded conceptualisation of self-determination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: Development of a measure using confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences,
23, 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00107-4
66.
NeighborsC.LarimerM. E.MarkmanG. I.KneeC. R. (2004).
Feeling controlled and drinking motives among college students: Contingent self-esteem as a mediator. Self and Identity,
3(3), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000029
67.
NgJ. Y. Y.NtoumanisN.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC.DeciE. L.RyanR. M.DudaJ. L.WilliamsG. C. (2012).
Self-determination theory applied to health contexts. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
7(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309
68.
OlesenM. H. (2011).
General causality orientations are distinct from but related to dispositional traits. Personality and Individual Differences,
51(4), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.015
69.
ØverupC. S.HaddenB. W.KneeC. R.RodriguezL. M. (2017).
Self-determination theory and intimate partner violence (IPV): Assessment of relationship causality orientations as predictors of IPV perpetration. Journal of Research in Personality,
70, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.07.002
70.
PattersonE. A. (2017). Objective and subjective career success: A quantitative study examining the role of endurance athletic and motivational styles. [PhD Thesis].
Capella University.
71.
PhillipsP.AbrahamC.BondR. (2003).
Personality, cognition, and university students' examination performance. European Journal of Personality,
17, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.488
72.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003).
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,
88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
73.
ProtogerouC.HaggerM. S. (2020).
A checklist to assess the quality of survey studies in psychology methods in psychology. Methods in Psychology,
3, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2020.100031
74.
R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
75.
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2020). Autonomy supportive interventions. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (pp. 510–522). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/97811086773180.035
76.
RhodesR. E.CourneyaK. S. (2003).
Relationships between personality, an extended theory of planned behaviour model and exercise behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology,
8, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910703762879183
77.
RobertsB. W.LuoJ.BrileyD. A.ChowP. I.SuR.HillP. L. (2017).
A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin,
143(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
78.
RoseE. A.MarklandD.ParfittG. (2001).
The development and initial validation of the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale. Journal of Sports Sciences,
19(6), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101300149393
79.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989).
Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
57, 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
80.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guildford Press.
81.
SadabadiM. H.BabapourJ.PoursharifiH. (2011).
The role of general causality orientations on self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,
30, 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.094
82.
SchenkerN.GentlemanJ. F. (2001).
On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician,
55(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317097960
83.
SeatonM.MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2010).
Big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability and moderation – Two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal,
47(2), 390–433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209350493
84.
StanleyT. D.DoucouliagosH. (2014).
Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods,
5(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095
85.
StevensM. J.ConstantinescuP.-M.UgurH.ConstantinescuI. (2015).
Causality orientations and psychological well-being in young European and Eurasian adults.International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation,
4(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000028
86.
TeixeiraP. J.MarquesM. M.SilvaM. N.BrunetJ.DudaJ.HaerensL.La GuardiaJ.LindwallM.LondsdaleC.MarklandD.MichieS.MollerA. C.NtoumanisN.PatrickH.ReeveJ.RyanR. M.SebireS.StandageM.VansteenkinsteM., … (2020). Classification of techniques used in self-determination theory-based interventions in health contexts: An expert consensus study.Motivation Science, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000172
87.
TobeM.NemotoT.TsujinoN.YamaguchiT.KatagiriN.FujiiC.MizunoM. (2016).
Characteristics of motivation and their impacts on the functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry,
65, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.10.006
88.
VallerandR. J.BlaisM. R.LacoutureY.DeciE. L. (1987).
L'echelle des orientations generales a la causalite: Validation Canadienne Francaise du general causality orientations scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science,
19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079872
89.
Van den BergheL.SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.AeltermanN.CardonG.TallirI. B.HaerensL. (2013).
Observed need-supportive and need-thwarting teaching behavior in physical education: Do teachers' motivational orientations matter?Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
14(5), 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.04.006
90.
ViechtbauerW. (2010).
Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software,
36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
91.
WampoldB. E.MondinG. W.MoodyM.StichF.BensonK.AhnH.-N. (1997).
A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “all must have prizes”. Psychological Bulletin,
122(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.203
92.
WeinerB. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer.
93.
WiedemannA. U.SchüzB.SniehottaF.ScholzU.SchwarzerR. (2009).
Disentangling the relation between intentions, planning, and behaviour: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychology & Health,
24(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/0.1080/08870440801958214
94.
ZhangC. Q.ZhangR.SchwarzerR.HaggerM. S. (2019).
A meta-analysis of the health action process approach. Health Psychology,
38(7), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000728
95.
ZhouG.SunC.KnollN.HamiltonK.SchwarzerR. (2015).
Self-efficacy, planning and action control in an oral self-care intervention. Health Education Research,
30(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyv032
96.
ZuckermanM.GioiosoC.TelliniS. (1988).
Control orientation, self-monitoring, and preference for image versus quality approach to advertising. Journal of Research in Personality,
22(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(88)90026-8
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
