Background: Strong evidence-based advocacy efforts have now translated into high level political support and concrete goals for improving breastfeeding outcomes among women in the United States. In spite of this, major challenge remain for promoting, supporting and especially for protecting breastfeeding in the country.
Objectives: The goals of this commentary are to argue in favor of: A) Changes in the default social and environmental systems, that would allow women to implement their right to breastfeed their infants, B) A multi-level and comprehensive monitoring system to measure process and outcomes indicators in the country.
Methods: Evidence-based commentary.
Results: Breastfeeding rates in the United States can improve based on a well coordinated social marketing framework. This approach calls for innovative promotion through mass media, appropriate facility based and community based support (e.g., Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, WIC-coordinated community based peer counseling), and adequate protection for working women (e.g., longer paid maternity leave, breastfeeding or breast milk extraction breaks during the working day) and women at large by adhering and enforcing the WHO ethics Code for the Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes. Sound infant feeding practices monitoring systems, which include WIC administrative food package data, are needed.
Conclusions: Given the current high level of political support to improve breastfeeding in the United States, a window of opportunity has been opened. Establishing breastfeeding as the social norm in the USA will take time, but the global experience indicates that it can be done.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hospital support for breastfeeding: preventing obesity begins in hospitals. http://www.cdc.gov/VitalSigns/BreastFeeding/. Accessed December 20, 2011.
Institute of Medicine. Updating the USDA National Breastfeeding Campaign: workshop summary. 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13235. Accessed December 20, 2011.
ReaMF. A review of breastfeeding in Brazil and how the country has reached ten months’ breastfeeding duration [article in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19(Suppl 1):S37-45.
8.
Segall-CorreaAMMarin-leonLPanigassiGReaMFPérez-EscamillaR. Amamentação e alimentação infantil. Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saude da Crianca e da Mulher - PNDS 2006. Brasilia: Ministerio da Saude, Brasilia, 2009; Chapter 10, pp: 195-212. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pnds_crianca_mulher.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2011.
9.
ChapmanDJPerez-EscamillaR. Breastfeeding among minority women: moving from risk factors to interventions. Adv Nutr. 2012Jan;3(1):95-104.
MerewoodAMehtaSDChamberlainLBPhilippBLBauchnerH. Breastfeeding rates in US Baby-Friendly hospitals: results of a national survey. Pediatrics. 2005;116: 628-634.
12.
ChapmanDJPérez-EscamillaR. US national breastfeeding monitoring and surveillance: current status and recommendations. J Hum Lact. 2009;25:139-150.
13.
ChapmanDJMerewoodAArmahRAPérez-EscamillaR. Breastfeeding status on US birth certificates: where do we go from here?Pediatrics. 2008;122:e1159-1163.
WhaleySKoleilatMJiangL. WIC infant food package issuance data are a valid measure of infant feeding practices. J Hum Lact. In press.
16.
Grummer-StrawnLMReinoldCKrebsNF; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0-59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59:1-15. Erratum in: MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59:1184.
