A Qualitative Study to Understand Cultural Factors Affecting a Mother’s Decision to Breast or Formula Feed

Abstract

Background:

The presence of barriers is not sufficient to explain breastfeeding rate disparities. A relatively unexplored area in coping with breastfeeding barriers is culture.

Objective:

This research aims to better understand the role of culture in a woman’s infant feeding decision by using race and socioeconomic status as indicators of culture.

Methods:

Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with 42 pregnant women or mothers of infants younger than 12 months. Focus group composition was determined by self-identified African American or white race and self-reported eligibility for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) or ineligibility (non-WIC).

Results:

Most participants acknowledged that breastfeeding was best, yet differences arose between groups in the perception of, and reaction to, breastfeeding barriers. WIC and non-WIC participants of both races indicated that some circumstances necessitated formula use. WIC participants felt that this was personally and socially acceptable due to need, whereas non-WIC participants felt that this was personally and socially unacceptable. When a barrier arose, WIC participants of both races felt that the infant feeding choice was not theirs and formula use might be inevitable. In contrast, non-WIC participants of both races expressed that they persevered to continue breastfeeding and did so by establishing small, achievable goals and seeking mentors.

Conclusion:

Educational and public health efforts to reduce breastfeeding disparities may be enhanced if support is tailored to acknowledge cultural differences among women and address factors that make either breastfeeding or formula feeding acceptable, or even preferable, within their communities.

Keywords

breastfeeding breastfeeding attitudes breastfeeding beliefs culture formula feeding infant feeding race socioeconomic status

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):496-506.

World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.

American Dietetic Association. Promoting and supporting breastfeeding. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(11):1926-1942.

Chung

Raman

. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007;153:1-186.

Ball

Bennett

. The economic impact of breastfeeding. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48(1):253-262.

Cohen

Mrtek

. Comparison of maternal absenteeism and infant illness rates among breast-feeding and formula-feeding women in two corporations. Am J Health Promot. 1995;10(2):148-153.

Montgomery

Splett

. Economic benefit of breast-feeding infants enrolled in WIC. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97(4):379-385.

Darling

Maurice

Barker

Grummer-Strawn

. Breastfeeding rates in the United States by characteristics of the child, mother, or family: the 2002 National Immunization Survey. Pediatrics. 2005;115(1);e31-e37.

Heck

Braveman

Cubbin

Chávez

Kiely

. Socioeconomic status and breastfeeding initiation among California mothers. Public Health Rep. 2006;121(1):51-59.

10.

Flower

Willoughby

Cadigan

Perrin

Randolph

. Understanding breastfeeding initiation and continuation in rural communities: a combined qualitative/quantitative approach. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12(3):402-414.

11.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. DATA2010 . . . the Healthy People 2010: Focus area: 16-maternal infant and child health [data file]. http://wonder.cdc.gov/data2010/focus.htm. Published 2008. Accessed October 8, 2009.

12.

Hurley

Black

Papas

Quigg

. Variation in breastfeeding behaviours, perceptions, and experiences by race/ethnicity among a low-income statewide sample of Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participants in the United States. Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4(2):95-105.

13.

Mitra

Khoury

Hinton

Carothers

. Predictors of breastfeeding intention among low-income women. Matern Child Health J. 2004;8(2):65-69.

14.

Guttman

Zimmerman

. Low-income mothers’ views on breastfeeding. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(10):1457-1473.

15.

Zimmerman

Guttman

. “Breast is best”: knowledge among low-income mothers is not enough. J Hum Lact. 2001;17(1):14-19.

16.

Johnston-Robledo

Fred

. Self-objectification and lower income pregnant women’s breastfeeding attitudes. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2008;38(1):1-21.

17.

Moore

Coty

. Prenatal and postpartum focus groups with primiparas: breastfeeding attitudes, support, barriers, self-efficacy, and intention. J Pediatr Health Care. 2006;20(1):35-46.

18.

Lewallen

Street

. Initiating and sustaining breastfeeding in African American women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010;39(6):667-674.

19.

Ringel-Kulka

Jensen

McLaurin

. Community-based participatory research of breastfeeding disparities in African American women. ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition. 2011;3(4):233-239.

20.

Higgins

. Puerto Rican cultural beliefs: influence on infant feeding practices in western New York. J Transcult Nurs. 2000;11(1):19-30.

21.

Pak-Gorstein

Haq

Graham

. Cultural influences on infant feeding practices. Pediatr Rev. 2009;30(3):e11-e21.

22.

Street

Lewallen

. The influence of culture on breast-feeding decisions by African American women and white women. J Perinat Neonat Nurs. 2013;27(1):43-51.

23.

Triandis

. The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. Am Psychol. 1996;51(4):407-415.

24.

Vaisey

. What people want: rethinking poverty, culture, and educational attainment. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2010;629(1):75-103.

25.

Lewis

. La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty—San Juan and New York. New York, NY: Random House; 1966.

26.

Bailey

Pain

Aarvold

. A ‘give it a go’ breast-feeding culture and early cessation among low-income mothers. Midwifery. 2004;20(3):240-250.

27.

Swidler

. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2001.

28.

Ajzen

. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211.

29.

Krueger

Casey

. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2000.

30.

Stewart

Shamdasani

Rook

. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007.

31.

Polit

Beck

. Essentials of Nursing Research. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

32.

Webb

. Understanding and Designing Marketing Research. London: Academic Press; 1992.

33.

Jeanfreau

Jack

. Appraising qualitative research in health education: guidelines for public health educators. Health Promot Pract. 2010;11(5):612-617.

34.

Sandelowski

. The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8(3):27-37.

35.

NVivo [computer program]. Version 9. Burlington, MA: QSR International; 2010.

36.

Nommsen-Rivers

Chantry

Cohen

Dewey

. Comfort with the idea of formula feeding helps explain ethnic disparity in breastfeeding intentions among expectant first-time mothers. Breastfeed Med. 2010;5(1):25-33.

37.

Forste

Weiss

Lippincott

. The decision to breastfeed in the United States: does race matter? Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):291-296.

38.

Stewart-Knox

Gardiner

Wright

. What is the problem with breast-feeding? A qualitative analysis of infant feeding perceptions. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003;16(4):265-273.

39.

Raisler

. Against the odds. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000;45(3):253-263.

40.

Khoury

Moazzem

Jarjoura

Carothers

Hinton

. Breastfeeding initiation in low-income women: role of attitudes, support, and perceived control. Womens Health Issues. 2005;15(2):64-72.

41.

Gross

Caulfield

Bentley

. Counseling and motivational videotapes increase duration of breast-feeding in African-American WIC participants who initiate breastfeeding. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98(2):143-148.

42.

Olson

Haider

Vangjel

Bolton

Gold

. A quasi-experimental evaluation of a breastfeeding support program for low income women in Michigan. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(1):86-93.

43.

Bloom

Goldbloom

Stevens

. Factors affecting the mother’s choice of infant feeding method. Acta Paed Scand. 1982;71(suppl 300):3-8.

44.

Nelson

. A meta-synthesis related to infant feeding decision making. Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2012;37(4):247-252.

45.

Heinig

Follett

Ishii

Kavanagh-Prochaska

Cohen

Panchula

. Barriers to compliance with infant-feeding recommendations among low-income women. J Hum Lact. 2006;22(1):27-38.

46.

Nelson

. A metasynthesis of qualitative breastfeeding studies. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006;51(2):e13-e20.

47.

do Paço

Rodrigues

Duarte

Pinheiro

de Oliveira

Soares

. The role of marketing in the promotion of breastfeeding. J Med Marketing. 2010;10(3):199-212.