Using Benchmarking Techniques and the 2011 Maternity Practices Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINC) Survey to Improve Performance among Peer Groups across the United States

Abstract

Background:

A substantial proportion of US maternity care facilities engage in practices that are not evidence-based and that interfere with breastfeeding. The CDC Survey of Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINC) showed significant variation in maternity practices among US states.

Objective:

The purpose of this article is to use benchmarking techniques to identify states within relevant peer groups that were top performers on mPINC survey indicators related to breastfeeding support.

Methods:

We used 11 indicators of breastfeeding-related maternity care from the 2011 mPINC survey and benchmarking techniques to organize and compare hospital-based maternity practices across the 50 states and Washington, DC. We created peer categories for benchmarking first by region (grouping states by West, Midwest, South, and Northeast) and then by size (grouping states by the number of maternity facilities and dividing each region into approximately equal halves based on the number of facilities).

Results:

Thirty-four states had scores high enough to serve as benchmarks, and 32 states had scores low enough to reflect the lowest score gap from the benchmark on at least 1 indicator. No state served as the benchmark on more than 5 indicators and no state was furthest from the benchmark on more than 7 indicators. The small peer group benchmarks in the South, West, and Midwest were better than the large peer group benchmarks on 91%, 82%, and 36% of the indicators, respectively. In the West large, the Midwest large, the Midwest small, and the South large peer groups, 4-6 benchmarks showed that less than 50% of hospitals have ideal practice in all states.

Conclusion:

The evaluation presents benchmarks for peer group state comparisons that provide potential and feasible targets for improvement.

Keywords

assessment benchmark breastfeeding hospital practices maternity quality improvement United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wright

Rice

Wells

. Changing hospital practices to increase the duration of breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 1996;97(5):669-675.

World Health Organization/United Nations Children’s Fund. Protecting, Promoting, and Supporting Breast-Feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1989.

World Health Organization. International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1981.

Baby-Friendly USA. Baby-Friendly Hospitals and Birth Centers as of June 2013. Available at: http://www.babyfriendlyusa.org. Accessed September 28, 2013.

Eidelman

Schanler

, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e827.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013 Breastfeeding Report Card. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2013BreastfeedingReportCard.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2013.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding trends and updated national health objectives for exclusive breastfeeding—United States, birth years. 2000-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. August 3, 2007;57(30):760-763.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs—hospital practices to support breastfeeding. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. August 2, 2011;60(30):1020-1025.

Kramer

Chalmers

Hodnett

. Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the republic of Belarus. JAMA. 2001;285(4):413-420.

10.

Feldman-Winter

Douglass-Bright

Bartick

Matranga

. The new mandate from the Joint Commission on the perinatal care core measure of exclusive breast milk feeding: implications for practice and implementation in the United States. J Hum Lact. 2013;29(3):291-295.

11.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. mPINC Results—State Reports and Tables. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/mpinc/results.htm Accessed September. 20, 2013.

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Report Card—United States, 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2012BreastfeedingReportCard.pdf. Accessed September. 20, 2013.

13.

The Joint Commission. Benchmarking. 2nd ed. Oak Brook, IL: Joint Commission Resources; 2011.

14.

Camp

. Benchmarking applied to health care. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994;20(5):229-238.

15.

Collins-Fulea

Mohr

Tillett

. Improving midwifery practice: the American College of Nurse-Midwives’ benchmarking project. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2005;50(6):461-471.

16.

The Commonwealth Fund. Implementing the Affordable Care Act: Choosing an Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan. Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Issue%20Brief/2013/Mar/1677_Corlette_implementing_ACA_choosing_essential_hlt_benefits_reform_brief.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2013.

17.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC mPINC Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/mpinc/survey.htm. Updated May 7, 2013. Accessed September 11, 2013.

18.

Furukawa

Raghu

Spaulding

Vinze

. Adoption of health information technology for medication safety in U.S. Hospitals, 2006. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):865-875.

19.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. mPINC Results. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/mpinc/results.htm. Accessed July 11, 2012.

20.

Silow-Carroll

Moody

. Lessons from high- and low-performing states for raising overall health system performance. Commonwealth Fund Issue Brief. May 2011.

21.

Edwards

Philipp

. Using maternity practices in infant nutrition and care (mPINC) survey results as a catalyst for change. J Hum Lact. 2010;26(4):399-404.

22.

Bartick

Edwards

Walker

Jenkins

. The Massachusetts baby-friendly collaborative: lessons learned from an innovation to foster implementation of best practices. J Hum Lact. 2010;26(4):405-411.

23.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed October 8, 2012.

24.

American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e827-e841.

25.

Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. Model breastfeeding policy. Breastfeeding Med. 2007;2(1):50-55.

26.

O’Hearne

. A review of methods to assess competency. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2006;22(5):241-245.

27.

Whelan

. Competency assessment of nursing staff. Orthop Nurs. 2006;25(3):198-202.

28.

Arcand

Neumann

. Nursing competency assessment across the continuum of care. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2005;36(6):247-254.

29.

Benson

. What is normal? A study of normal breastfeeding dyads during the first sixty hours of life. Breastfeed Rev. 2001;9(1):27-32.

30.

Anderson

Moore

Hepworth

Bergman

. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003519.

31.

Cakmak

Kuguoglu

. Comparison of the breastfeeding patterns of mothers who delivered their babies per vagina and via cesarean section: an observational study using the LATCH breastfeeding charting system. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(7):1128-1137.

32.

Howard

Lanphear

Eberly

deBlieck

Oakes

Lawrence

. Randomized clinical trial of pacifier use and bottle-feeding or cupfeeding and their effect on breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):511-518.

33.

American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Care of the neonate. In: Lockwood

Lemons

, eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 6th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2007:205-249.

34.

Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. Guidelines for glucose monitoring and treatment of hypoglycemia in breastfed neonates. Breastfeeding Med. 2006;1(3):178-184.

35.

Svensson

Matthiesen

Widstrom

. Night rooming-in: who decides? An example of staff influence on mother’s attitude. Birth. 2005;32(2):99-106.

36.

Ball

Ward-Platt

Heslop

Leech

Brown

. Randomised trial of infant sleep location on the postnatal ward. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(12):1005-1010.

37.

Lindenberg

Cabrera

Jimenez

. The effect of early post-partum mother-infant contact and breast-feeding promotion on the incidence and continuation of breast-feeding. Int J Nurs Stud. 1990;27(3):179-186.

38.

Bystrova

Widström

Matthiesen

.Early lactation performance in primiparous and multiparous women in relation to different maternity home practices. A randomised trial in St. Petersburg. Int Breastfeed J. 2007;2(7):9.

39.

Ingram

Rosser

Jackson

. Breastfeeding peer supporters and a community support group: evaluating their effectiveness. Matern Child Nutr. 2005;1(2):111-118.

40.

Chapman

Damio

Perez-Escamilla

. Differential response to breastfeeding peer counseling within a low-income, predominantly Latina population. J Hum Lact. 2004;20(4):389-396.

41.

American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):297-316.

42.

Bliss

Wilkie

Acredolo

Berman

Tebb

. The effect of discharge pack formula and breast pumps on breastfeeding duration and choice of infant feeding method. Birth. 1997;24(2):90-97.

43.

Snell

Krantz

Keeton

Delgado

Peckham

. The association of formula samples given at hospital discharge with the early duration of breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 1992;8(2):67-72.

44.

Taveras

Grummer-Strawn

Richardson

Marshall

Rêgo

Miroshnik

Lieu

. Opinions and practices of clinicians associated with continuation of exclusive breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3):e283-e290.

45.

Committee on Healthcare for Underserved Women, Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee opinion no. 361: breastfeeding: maternal and infant aspects. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 pt 1):479-480.