Economic,Environmental,and Health Impacts of Changes in Breastfeeding Rates in Türkiye: A Cost Projection Analysis

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to examine the economic, environmental, and health impacts of changes in 10 different breastfeeding rates across various scenarios and to estimate the associated costs.

Methods:

A quantitative research design was employed, based on cost projection analysis. The Cost of Not Breastfeeding Tool and the Green Feeding Tool were used to evaluate the health, environmental, and economic outcomes of breastfeeding. In addition, linear regression analysis was performed to assess the reliability of the estimated health effects.

Results:

Scenario analysis demonstrated that a 10% increase in breastfeeding rates leads to substantial environmental, health, and economic benefits. Accordingly, a 10% increase prevents an average loss of 7 million litres of breast milk, reduces carbon dioxide emissions by ~9.2 million kg, and saves 3.976 million L of water. With regard to health outcomes, a 10% increase in breastfeeding rates was associated with a statistically significant reduction in both number of cases and deaths (P < 0.05). From an economic perspective, it is estimated that a 10% increase in exclusive breastfeeding rates alone could generate an average cost saving of US$32 million.

Conclusion:

The results indicate that direct breastfeeding plays a crucial role in reducing water and carbon footprints, preventing disease burden and associated mortality due to not breastfeeding, and lowering the costs related to these outcomes. Promoting and supporting midwives’ active role in increasing breastfeeding rates is essential for both health and environmental sustainability, and national policies should be reinforced to support this objective.

Keywords

breastfeeding costs and cost analysis economic evaluation environmental impact maternal and child health planetary health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agostoni

Baglioni

La Vecchia

Molari

Berti

(2023). Interlinkages between climate change and food systems: The impact on child malnutrition—narrative review. Nutrients, 15(2), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020416

Basbous

Yehya

Salti

Tamim

Nabulsi

(2024). Cost-benefit analysis of a multicomponent breastfeeding promotion and support intervention in a developing country. PloS one, 19(7), e0295194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295194

Bode

Raman

A. S.

Murch

S. H.

Rollins

N. C.

Gordon

J. I.

(2020). Understanding the mother-breastmilk-infant “triad”. Science, 367(6482), 1070–1072. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6147

Campbell-Lendrum

Neville

Schweizer

Neira

(2023). Climate change and health: Three grand challenges. Nature Medicine, 29(7), 1631–1638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02438-w

Dadhich

J. P.

Smith

J. P.

Iellamo

Suleiman

(2021). Climate change and infant nutrition: Estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from milk formula sold in selected Asia Pacific countries. Journal of Human Lactation, 37(2), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334421994769

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. (2019). 2018 Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması: Ana rapor (TNSA). http://www.sck.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf

Hoang

M. V.

Nguyen

T. T.

Tran

A. T.

Luu

T. Q.

M. Q.

Tran

H. T.

Nguyen

O. T. X.

Mathisen

(2024). Cost analysis of establishing and operating the first human milk bank at Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children in Vietnam: An activity-based costing ingredients study. International Breastfeeding Journal, 19(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00657-6

Joffe

Webster

Shenker

(2019). Support for breastfeeding is an environmental imperative. BMJ, 367, art. l5646. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5646

Karlsson

J. O.

Garnett

Rollins

N. C.

Röös

(2019). The carbon footprint of breastmilk substitutes in comparison with breastfeeding. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.043

10.

Ley

S. H.

Chavarro

J. E.

Bao

Hinkle

S. N.

Wander

P. L.

Rich-Edwards

Olsen

Vaag

Damm

Grunnet

L. G.

Mills

J. L.

F. B.

Zhang

. (2020). Lactation duration and long-term risk for incident type 2 diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 43(4), 793–798. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2237

11.

D. P.

Zhang

Z. M.

G. X.

Z. F.

Wang

P. F.

Cheng

Liu

Y. P.

Zhao

Y. S

. (2014). Breastfeeding and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 epidemiological studies. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP, 15(12), 4829–4837. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.12.4829

12.

Miatton

Buja

Cozzolino

Mafrici

S. F.

Zamagni

Monasta

Damiani

(2025). The global burden of suboptimal breastfeeding from 1990 to 2019: Results and insights of the Global Burden of Disease. European Journal of Pediatrics, 184(7), 448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06260-z

13.

Onah

N. M.

Hoy

Slofstra

(2025). The costs of suboptimal breastfeeding in Ontario, Canada, and potential healthcare resource impacts from improving rates: A pediatric health system costing analysis. International Breastfeeding Journal, 20(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00702-y

14.

Pérez-Escamilla

Tomori

Hernández-Cordero

Baker

Barros

A. J.

Bégin

Chapman

D. J.

Grummer-Strawn

L. M.

McCoy

Menon

Neves

P. A. R.

Piwoz

Rollins

Victora

C. G.

Richter

, on behalf of the 2023 Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. (2023). Breastfeeding: Crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world. Lancet, 401(10375), 472–485.

15.

Pope

D. H.

Karlsson

J. O.

Baker

McCoy

(2021). Examining the environmental impacts of the dairy and baby food industries: Are first-food systems a crucial missing part of the healthy and sustainable food systems agenda now underway? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312678

16.

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change, Climate Change Directorate (2024). Climate change mitigation strategy and action plan 2024–2030. https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/haberler/files/CLIMATE%20CHANGE%20MITIGATION%20STRATEGY%20AND%20ACTION%20PLAN%20_EN(1).pdf

17.

Septiani

N. N.

Pramono

Nguyen

T. T.

Mathisen

Smith

(2025). Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: Estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk tools. International Breastfeeding Journal, 20(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00732-6

18.

Smith

J. P.

Iellamo

Nguyen

T. T.

Mathisen

(2023). The volume and monetary value of human milk produced by the world’s breastfeeding mothers: Results from a new tool. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, art. 1152659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1152659

19.

Smith

J. P.

Baker

Mathisen

Long

Rollins

Waring

(2024). A proposal to recognize investment in breastfeeding as a carbon offset. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 102(5), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.290210

20.

Smith

J. P.

Borg

Nguyen

T. T.

Iellamo

Pramono

Mathisen

(2024). Estimating carbon and water footprints associated with commercial milk formula production and use: Development and implications of the Green Feeding Climate Action Tool. Frontiers in Nutrition, 11, art. 1371036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1371036

21.

Unar-Munguía

Stern

Colchero

M. A.

González de Cosío

(2019). The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in Mexico: Maternal health outcomes and costs. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 15(1), art. e12661. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12661

22.

UNICEF (2025). Breastfeeding in Europe and Central Asia: Investment case https://www.unicef.org/bulgaria/en/media/20891/file/Breastfeeding%20investment%20case%20-%20Europe%20and%20Central%20Asia_01_August_2025.pdf.

23.

Victora

C. G.

Bahl

Barros

A. J.

França

G. V.

Horton

Krasevec

Murch

Sankar

M. J.

Walker

Rollins

N. C.

, on behalf of the Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. (2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet, 387(10017), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7

24.

Walters

Horton

Siregar

A. Y. M.

Pitriyan

Hajeebhoy

Mathisen

Phan

L. T. H.

Rudert

(2016). The cost of not breastfeeding in Southeast Asia. Health Policy and Planning, 31(8), 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw044

25.

Walters

D. D.

Phan

L. T. H.

Mathisen

(2019). The cost of not breastfeeding: Global results from a new tool. Health Policy and Planning, 34(6), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz050

26.

WHO (2023). Breastfeeding. https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding#tab=tab_3

27.

WHO & UNICEF. (2019). The extension of the 2025 maternal, infant and young child nutrition targets to 2030 (WHO/UNICEF Discussion Paper). UNICEF.

28.

Zimmermann

Abadi

A. M.

Brauman

K. A.

Maestu

Oude Essink

Schuster-Wallace

Smith

Madani

Adeel

Gribble

M. O.

(2025). Addressing water scarcity to support climate resilience and human health. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 21(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf001