This article considers how the civil litigation and mediation process work in practice and highlights the interactional and discursive practices by which settlement activities are coordinated and managed. The research examines settlement work in a perspicuous large money damage case involving insurance issues and what complications emerge in relation to these issues. The analysis focuses on how the judge-mediator organizes settlement activities in light of the available insurance, by seeking settlement contributions first from insurance sources (“primary pockets” and “deep pockets”) and only as a last resort from the personal assets (“personal pockets”) of the uninsured defendants. The study finds that the settlement work is insurance-infused and details how the pursuit and defense of insurance “deep pockets” are central to the negotiations and the positions of the parties in the case.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co. 210 Cal. App. 2d 825 (1962).
2.
Baker, Tom. 2001. Blood money, new money, and the moral economy of tort law in action. Law and Society Review35:275-319.
3.
Baker, Tom, and Jonathan Simon, eds. 2002. Embracing risk: The changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
Burns, Stacy. 1998. The name of the game is movement: Concession-seeking in judicial mediation of large money damage cases. Mediation Quarterly, 15:359-367.
5.
Burns, Stacy. 2000. Making settlement work: An examination of the work of judicial mediators. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth/Ashgate.
6.
Burns, Stacy. 2001. “Think your blackest thoughts and darken them”: Judicial mediation of large money damage disputes. Human Studies24:227-249.
7.
Burns, Stacy, and Mark Peyrot. 2003. Tough love: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems50:416-438.
8.
Calabresi, Guido. 1969. The cost of accidents. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Council for Economic Advisors Report, April 2002.
10.
Dillon v. Legg. 68 Cal. 2d 728 (1968).
11.
Emerson, Robert. 1969. Judging delinquents: Context and process in juvenile court. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Galanter, Mark, and Mia Cahill. 1994. Most cases settle: Judicial promotion and regulation of settlements. Stanford Law Review46:1339-1391.
13.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1996. Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly59:5-21.
15.
Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
16.
Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks. 1970. On formal structures of practical actions. In Theoretical sociology, edited by J. C. McKinney and E. A. Tiryakian. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
17.
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
18.
Greatbatch, David, and Robert Dingwall. 1989. Selective facilitation: Some preliminary observations in a strategy used by divorce mediators. Law and Society Review23:613-641.
19.
Greatbatch, David, and Robert Dingwall. 1994. The interactive construction of interventions by divorce mediators. In New Directions in Mediation, edited by Joseph Folger and Tricia Jones. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Greatbatch, David, and Robert Dingwall. 1997. Argumentative talk in divorce mediation sessions. American Sociological Review62:151-170.
21.
Greatbatch, David, Robert Dingwall, and Lucia Ruggerone. 1998. Gender and interaction in divorce mediation. Mediation Quarterly15:277-285.
22.
Gulliver, Phillip. 1979. Disputes and negotiation: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Academic Press.
23.
Holstein, James. 1993. Court-ordered insanity. New York: Aldine.
24.
Insurance Information Institute Report, June 2002.
25.
Johansen v. Calif. St. Auto Ass’n Inter-Ins. Bureau 15 C3d 9, 16 (1975).
26.
Lynch, Michael. 1982. Closure and disclosure in pre-trial argument. Human Studies5:285-318.
27.
Lynch, Michael. 1997. Preliminary notes on judges’ work: The judge as a constituent of courtroom “hearings.” In Law in action, edited by Max Travers and John Manzo. Alder-shot, UK: Dartmouth/Ashgate.
28.
Maynard, Douglas. 1984. Inside plea bargaining: The language of negotiation. New York: Plenum.
29.
Moerman, Michael. 1988. Talking culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
30.
Peyrot, Mark. 1982. Understanding ethnomethodology: A remedy for some common misconceptions. Human Studies5:261-283.
31.
Peyrot, Mark. 1987. Circumspection in psychotherapy: Structures and strategies of counselor-client interactions. Semiotica65:249-268.
32.
Peyrot, Mark, and Stacy Burns. 2001. Sociologists on trial: Theoretical competition and juror reasoning. The American Sociologist32:42-69.
33.
Pollner, Melvin. 1974. Mundane reasoning. Philosophy of the Social Sciences4:35-54.
34.
Pollner, Melvin. 1979. Explicative transactions: Making and managing meaning in traffic court. In Everyday Language, edited by George Psathas. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Pollner, Melvin, and Robert Emerson. 2001. Ethnomethodology and ethnography. In Handbook of Ethnography, edited by Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, Lyn Lofland, and John Lofland. London: Sage.
36.
Pound, Roscoe. 1942. Social control through law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Schelling, Thomas. 1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Sudnow, David. 1965. Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code. Social Problems112:255-276.
39.
Weber, Max. 1947/1967. Max Weber on law in economy and society. Edited by Max Rheinstein. New York: Simon and Schuster.
40.
Weber, Max. 1958. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner’s.
41.
Weekly Jury Verdict Reports, California. 2000-2001. San Diego, CA: Tri-Service.
42.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
