Autoethnography has recently become a popular form of qualitative research. The current discourse on this genre of research refers almost exclusively to “evocative autoethnography” that draws upon postmodern sensibilities and whose advocates distance themselves from realist and analytic ethnographic traditions. The dominance of evocative autoethnography has obscured recognition of the compatibility of autoethnographic research with more traditional ethnographic practices. The author proposes the term analytic autoethnography to refer to research in which the researcher is (1) a full member in the research group or setting, (2) visible as such a member in published texts, and (3) committed to developing theoretical understandings of broader social phenomena. After briefly tracing the history of proto-autoethnographic research among realist ethnographers, the author proposes five key features of analytic autoethnography. He concludes with a consideration of the advantages and limitations of this genre of qualitative research.
Bochner, A. P., and C. Ellis. 2001. Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
12.
Burawoy, M.1998. The extended case method. Sociological Theory16:4-33.
13.
Charmaz, K., and R. G. Mitchell Jr.1997. The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance and style in ethnographic writing. In Reflexivity and voice, edited by R. Hertz, 193-215. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Clifford, J., and G. E. Marcus, eds. 1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Couch, C. J.1989. Social processes and relationships: A formal approach. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
16.
Davies, C. A.1999. Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. London: Routledge.
17.
Davis, F.1959. The cabdriver and his fare: Facets of a fleeting relationship. American Journal of Sociology65:158-165.
18.
Deegan, M. J.2001. The Chicago school of ethnography. In Handbook of ethnography, edited by P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland, 11-25. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Delamont, S., A. Coffey, and P. A. Atkinson. 2000. The twilight years? Educational ethnography and the five moments model. Qualitative Studies in Education13:223-238.
20.
Denzin, N. K.1989. Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Denzin, N. K.1997. Interpretive ethnography: ethnographic practices for the twenty-first century. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. 2000. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Dewey, J.1929. The quest for certainty. New York: Minton Balch.
24.
Ellis, C.1991. Sociological introspection and emotional experience. Symbolic Interaction14:23-50.
25.
Ellis, C.1995. Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26.
Ellis, C.1997. Evocative autoethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives. In Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice, edited by W. G. Tierney and Y. S. Lincoln, 115-142. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Ellis, C.2004. The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
28.
Ellis, C., and A. P. Bochner. 2000. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 733-768. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Fine, G. A.1995. A second Chicago school: The development of a postwar American sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Geertz, C.1988. Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
Gergen, K., and M. M. Gergen. 1991. Toward reflexive methodologies. In Research and reflexivity, edited by F. Steier, 76-95. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Gubrium, J. F., and J. A. Holstein. 1997. The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Hayano, D.1979. Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects. Human Organization38:99-104.
34.
Hayano, D.1982. Poker faces: The life and work of professional card players. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
Horowitz, R.1983. Honor and the American dream: Culture and identity in a Chicano community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
36.
Jules-Rosette, B.1975. African apostles: Ritual and conversion in the Church of John Maranke. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
Karp, D.1996. Speaking of sadness. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Kotarba, J.1980. Discovering amorphous social experience: The case of chronic pain. In Fieldwork experience: Qualitative approaches to social research, edited by W. B. Shaffir, R. A. Stebbins, and A. Turowetz, 57-67. New York: St Martin's.
39.
Liebow, E.1967. Tally's corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men. Boston: Little, Brown.
40.
Lofland, J.1970.Interaction istimagery and analytic interruptus. In Human nature and collective behavior: Papers in honor of Herbert Blumer, edited by T. Shibutani, 35-45. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
41.
Lofland, J.1971. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Lois, J.2003. Heroic efforts: The emotional culture of search and rescue volunteers. New York: New York University Press.
44.
Marti, G.2005. A mosaic of believers: Diversity and innovation in a multiethnic church. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
45.
Mehan, H., and H. Wood. 1975. The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley.
46.
Merton, R. K.1988. Some thoughts on the concept of sociological autobiography. In Sociological lives, edited by M. W. Riley, 78-99. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Mitchell, R. G., Jr.1983. Mountain experience: The psychology and sociology of adventure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Mitchell, R. G.2001. Dancing at Armageddon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Mitchell, R. G., Jr., and K. Charmaz. 1996. Telling tales, writing stories: Postmodernist visions and realist images in ethnographic writing. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography25:144-166.
50.
Murphy, R. F.1987. The body silent. New York: Norton.
51.
Naples, N. A.1996. Feminist participatory research and empowerment: Going public as survivors of childhood sexual abuse. With E. Clark. In Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice, edited by H. Gottfried, 160-183. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
52.
Ouellet, L. J.1994. Pedal to the metal: The work lives of truckers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
53.
Prus, R.1996. Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research: Intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.
54.
Review symposium: Crisis in representation. 2002. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography31:478-516.
55.
Richardson, L.1994. Writing as a method of inquiry. In The handbook of qualitative research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 516-529. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Riley, M. W., ed. 1988. Sociological lives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
Rosaldo, R.1993. Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon.
58.
Roth, J. A.1963. Timetables: Structuring the passage of time in hospital treatment and other careers. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
59.
Roy, D. E.1959/1960.“Banana time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization18:158-168.
60.
Sanders, C.1999. Understanding dogs: Living and working with canine companions. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
61.
Schutz, A.1962. Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In vol. 1 of Collected papers of Alfred Schutz, 3-47. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
62.
Schwalbe, M.1996a. The mirrors in men's faces. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography25:58-82.
63.
Schwalbe, M.1996b. Unlocking the iron cage: The men's movement, gender politics, and American culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
Smith, D.2000. Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
65.
Snow, D., and C. Morrill. 1995. Ironies, puzzles and contradictions in Denzin and Lincoln's vision of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22:358-362.
66.
Snow, D., C. Morrill, and L. Anderson. 2003. Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography2:181-200.
67.
Strathern, M.1987. The limits of auto-anthropology. In Anthropology at home, edited by A. Jackson, 16-37. London: Tavistock.
68.
Sudnow, D.1978. Ways of the hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
Turner, R.1947. The navy disbursing officer as a bureaucrat. American Sociological Review12:342-348.
70.
Van Maanen, J.1988. Tales of the field: On the writing of ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
Wacquant, Loic. 2003. Body and soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. New York: Oxford University Press.
72.
Wallace, A.1965. Driving to work. In Context and meaning in cultural anthropology, edited by Melford E. Spiro, 277-292. New York: Free Press.
73.
Whyte, W. F.1943. Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74.
Zurcher, L. A.1983. Social roles: Conformity, conflict, and creativity. Beverly Hills: Sage.
