In this article we review ethnographic research on the Internet and computer-mediated communication. The technologically mediated environment prevents researchers from directly observing research participants and often makes the interaction anonymous. In addition, in the online environment direct interaction with participants is replaced by computer-screen data that are largely textual, but may include combinations of textual, visual, aural, and kinetic components. We show how the online environment requires adjustments in how ethnographers define the setting of their research, conduct participant observation and interviews, obtain access to settings and research subjects, and deal with the ethical dilemmas posed by the medium.
Adler, P., and P. Adler.1996. Preadolescent clique stratification and the hierarchy of identity. Sociological Inquiry66:111-42.
2.
Andrejevic, M.2004. The Webcam subculture and the digital enclosure. In Mediaspace: Place, scale and culture in a media age, edited by N. Couldry and A. McCarthy, 193-208. London and New York : Routledge.
3.
Ayers, M.D.2004. Fact or fiction: Notes of a man interviewing women online . In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies, edited by E. A. Buchanan, 262-72. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
4.
Bakardjieva, M.2005. Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: Sage.
5.
Barnes, Susan B.2004. Issues of attribution and identification in online social research. In Online social research: Methods, issues, & ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 203-22. New York: Peter Lang .
6.
Bell, D.2001. An introduction to cyberculture. New York: Routledge.
7.
Birkenmaier, J.2005. Weaving a web: The use of Internet technology in field education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work25 (1/2): 3-20.
8.
Bruckman, A.2004. Introduction: Opportunities and challenges in methodology and ethics. In Online social research: Methods, issues, & ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 101-4. New York: Peter Lang .
9.
Campbell, A.2006. The search for authenticity: An exploration of an online skinhead news-group. New Media & Society8 (2): 269-94.
10.
Carter, D.M.2004. Living in virtual communities: Making friends online. Journal of Urban Technology11 (3): 109-25.
11.
---. 2005. Living in virtual communities: An ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society8 (2): 148-67.
12.
Catterall, M., and Pauline M.2002. Researching consumers in virtual worlds: A cyberspace odyssey. Journal of Consumer Behavior1 (3): 228-38.
13.
Chen, S.-L.S., G.J. Hall, and M.D. Johns.2004. Research paparazzi in cyberspace: The voices of the researched. In Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics, edited by M. D. Johns , S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 157-75. New York: Peter Lang.
14.
Cherny, L.1999. Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
15.
Clark, D.2004. What if you meet face to face?: A case study in virtual/material research ethics. In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies , edited by E. A. Buchanan, 246-61. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
16.
Clegg Smith, K.M.2004. Electronic eavesdropping: The ethical issues involved in con-ducting a virtual ethnography. In Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 223-38. New York: Peter Lang.
17.
Cooper, A., D.L. Delmonico, and R. Burg.2000. Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity7 (2): 5-29.
18.
Correll, S.1995. The ethnography of an electronic bar: The lesbian cafe . Journal of Contemporary Ethnography24 (3): 270-98.
19.
Döring, N.2002. Studying online love and cyber romance. In Online social sciences, edited by B. Batinic , U.-D. Reips, and M. Bosnjak, 233-356. Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
20.
Dunbar, C. Jr., D. Rodriguez, and L. Parker.2003. Race, subjectivity, and the interview process. In Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, edited by J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 33-53. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: Sage.
21.
Eder, D. and L. Fingerson.2003. Interviewing children and adolescents . In Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, edited by J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 33-53. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: Sage.
22.
Fetterman, D.M.1998. Ethnography, 2nd ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
---. 2002. Web surveys to digital movies: Technological tools of the trade. Educational Researcher31 (6): 29-37.
24.
Fisher, B., M. Margolis, and D. Resnick.1996. Breaking ground on the virtual frontier: Surveying civic life on the Internet. American Sociologist27 (1): 11-29.
25.
Forte, M.2004. Co-Construction and field creation: Web site development as both an instrument and relationship in action research. In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies, edited by E. A. Buchanan, 219-45. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
26.
Garcia, A.C., and J.B. Jacobs.1998. The interactional organization of computer-mediated communication in the college classroom. Qualitative Sociology21 (3): 299-317.
27.
---. 1999. Eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction32 (4): 337-369.
28.
Gardiner, M.2000. Critiques of everyday life. London and New York: Routledge.
29.
Giesler, M., and M. Pohlmann.2003. The anthropology of file sharing: Consuming Napster as a gift. Advances in Consumer Research30:273-79.
30.
Gilham, C., and B.A. Moody.2001. Face to-face: Video conferencing creates opportunities for incarcerated youth. Journal of Correctional Education52 (1): 29-31.
31.
Goffman, E.1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
32.
Green, N.1999. Disrupting the field: Virtual reality technologies and "multisited" ethnographic methods. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3):409-21.
33.
Hampton, K.N., and B. Wellman.1999. Netville online and offline: Observing and surveying a wired suburb. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 475-492.
34.
---. 2001. Long distance community in the network society: Contact and support beyond Netville. The American Behavioral Scientist45 (3): 476-495.
35.
Haythornthwaite, C. and M.M. Kazmer.2002. Bringing the Internet home: Adult distance learners and their Internet, home and work worlds. In The Internet in everyday life, edited by B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite, 431-63. Oxford : Blackwell.
36.
Heath, D., Koch, E., Ley B., and M. Montoya.1999. Nodes and queries: Linking locations in networked fields of inquiry. The American Behavioral Scientist43:450-63.
37.
Highmore, B.2002. Everyday life and cultural theory: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
Huffaker, D.A., and S.L. Calvert.2005. Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10 (2) article 1.
40.
Johns, M.D., G.J. Hall, and T.L. Crowell.2004. Surviving the IRB review: Institutional guidelines and research strategies. In Online social research: Methods, issues, & ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 105-24. New York: Peter Lang.
41.
Jones, R.H.2005. "You show me yours, I'll show you mine": The negotiation of shifts from textual to visual modes in computer-mediated interaction among gay men. Visual Communication4 (1): 69-92.
42.
Keating, E., and G. Mirus.2003. American Sign Language in virtual space: Interactions between deaf users of computer-mediated video communication and the impact of technology on language practices. Language in Society32:693-714.
43.
Kendall, L.2002. Hanging out in the virtual pub: Masculinities and relationships online. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
---. 2004. Participants and observers in online ethnography: Five stories about identity. In Online social research: Methods, issues, & ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 125-40. New York: Peter Lang.
45.
Kleinman, S.S.2004. Researching OURNET: A case study of a multiple methods approach. In Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics , edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 48-62. New York: Peter Lang .
46.
Koufaris, M.2001. The search for a new identity: Post-organ transplant recipients and the Internet. In Our virtual world: The transformation of work, play and life via technology, edited by L. Chidambaram and Z. Ilze, 291-33. Hershey, PA and London: Idea Group Publishing .
47.
Kozinets, R.V.1998. On netnography: Initial reflection on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Advances in Consumer Research25:366-71.
48.
---. 2001. Utopian enterprise: articulating the meanings of Star Trek's culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research28: 67-88.
49.
---. 2002. The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research39 (1): 61-72.
50.
---. 2005. Communal big bangs and the ever-expanding netnographic universe. Thexis3:38-41.
51.
---. Forthcoming. Netnography 2.0. Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing, edited by Russell W. Belk.Edward Elgar Publishing.
52.
Kozinets, R.V., and J. Handelman.1998. Ensouling consumption: A netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behavior. Advances in Consumer Research25:475-80.
53.
LeBesco, K.2004. Managing visibility, intimacy, and focus in online critical ethnography. In Online social research: Methods, issues, and ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 63-79. New York: Peter Lang .
54.
Leung, Linda.2005. Virtual ethnicity: Race, resistance and the World Wide Web. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
55.
Liebow, E.1967. Tally's corner: A study of Negro street corner men. Boston, Toronto, London: Little, Brown and Company.
56.
Lindlif, T.R., and M.J. Shatzer.1998. Media ethnography in virtual space: Strategies, limits, and possibilities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media42 (2): 170-90.
57.
Livia, A.1999. Doing sociolinguistic research on the French Minitel. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 422-35.
58.
Lyman, P., and N. Wakeford.1999. Introduction: Going into the (virtual) field. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 359-76.
59.
Lyons, K.2003. Everyday wearable computer use: A case study of an expert user. Mobile HCI: 61-75.
60.
Lysloff, R.T.A.2003. Musical community on the Internet: An on-line ethnography . Cultural Anthropology18 (2): 233-63.
61.
Maczewski, M.1999. Interplay of online and onground realities: Internet research on youth experiences online. Master's thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
62.
Maczewski, M., M.A. Storey, and M. Hoskins.2004. Conducting congruent, ethical, qualitative research in Internet-mediated research environments. In Virtual research ethics, edited by E. Buchanan, 62-78. Information Science.
63.
Mann, C., and F. Stewart.2000. Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.
64.
---. 2002. Internet interviewing. In Handbook of interview research: Context and method, edited by J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 603-28. London : Sage.
65.
Markham, A.N.2004. Representation in online ethnographies: A matter of context sensitivity. In Online social research: Methods, issues, & ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 141-55. New York: Peter Lang .
66.
Marziali, E., and P. Donahue.2006. Caring for others: Internet video-conferencing group intervention for family caregivers of older adults with neurodegenerative disease. The Gerontologist46 (3): 398-403.
67.
Miller, D., and D. Slater.2000. The Internet: An ethnographic approach . Oxford & New York: Berg.
68.
Nelson, M.R., and C.C. Otnes.2005. Exploring cross-cultural ambivalence: A netnography of intercultural wedding message boards. Journal of Business Research58:89-95.
69.
Nissenbaum, H.2003. Securing trust online: Wisdom or oxymoron? In Virtual publics: Policy and community in an electronic age, edited by B. E. Kolko, 134-71. New York: Columbia University Press.
70.
Paccagnella, L.1997. Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research in virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3 (1) June.
71.
Pauwels, L.2005. Web sites as visual and multimodal cultural expressions: Opportunities and issues of online hybrid media research. Media, Culture, and Society27 (4): 604-13.
72.
Pink, S.2004. Making links: On situating a new Web site. Cambridge Journal of Education34 (2): 211-22.
73.
Porr, B.W., and R.E. Ployhart.2004. Organizational research over the Internet: Ethical challenges and opportunities. In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies, edited by E. A. Buchanan, 130-55. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
74.
Reinharz, S., and S.E. Chase.2003. Interviewing women. In Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, edited by J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 73-90. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: Sage.
75.
Riva, G.2002. The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. CyberPsychology and Behavior5 (6): 581-98.
76.
Roberts, L.D. and M.R. Parks.2001. The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. In Virtual gender: Technology, consumption and identity, edited by E. Green and A. Adam, 265-85. London : Routledge.
77.
Roberts, L., L. Smith, and C. Pollock.2004. Conducting ethical research online: Respect for individuals, identities and the ownership of words. In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies, edited by E. A. Buchanan, 156-73. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
78.
Ruhleder, K.2000. The virtual ethnographer: Fieldwork in distributed electronic environments. Field Methods12 (1): 3-17.
79.
Salaff, J.W.2002. Where home is the office. In The Internet in everyday life, edited by B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite, 464-95. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
80.
Schaap, Frank.2002. The words that took us there: Ethnography in virtual reality . Amsterdam: Askant Academic Publishers .
81.
Schwalbe, M.L. and M. Wolkomir.2003. Interviewing men. In Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, edited by J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 33-53. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: Sage.
82.
Shoham, Aviv.2004. Flow experiences and image making: An online chat-room ethnography. Psychology and Marketing21 (10): 855-82.
83.
Silver, D.2003. Communication, community, consumption: An ethnographic exploration of an online city. In Virtual publics: Policy and community in an electronic age, edited by B. E. Kolko, 327-54. New York: Columbia University Press.
84.
Soukup, Charles.1999. The gendered interactional patterns of computer-mediated chatrooms: A critical ethnographic study. Information Society15 (3): 161-176.
85.
---. 2000. Building a theory of multimedia CMC: An analysis, critique and integration of computer-mediated communication theory and research. New Media & Society2 (4): 407-25.
86.
Suoranta, J., and H. Lehtimäki.2004. Children in the information society . New York: Peter Lang.
87.
Sveningsson, M.2004. Ethics in Internet ethnography. In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies, edited by E. A. Buchanan, 45-61. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
88.
Taylor, T.L.1999. Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 436-49.
89.
Turkle, S.1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet . New York: Simon & Schuster .
90.
Vayreda, A., A. Galvez, F. Nunez, and B. Callen.2002. Participating in an electronic forum: The difference gender makes. Internet Research 3.0: Net/Work/Theory. Maastricht, The Netherlands.
91.
Waskul, D., and M. Douglass.1996. Considering the electronic participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research. The Information Society12: 129-39.
92.
Walstrom, M.K.2000a. The eating disorder is not YOU: Applying Bakhtin's theories in analyzing narrative co-construction in an Internet support group. In Studies in Symbolic Interaction, edited by N. Denzin, 241-60. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
93.
---. 2000b. "You know, who's the thinnest?": Combating surveillance and creating safety in coping with eating disorders online. CyberPsychology3 (5): 761-83.
94.
---. 2004a. Ethics and engagement in communication scholarship: Analyzing public, online support groups as researcher/participant-experiencer. In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies, edited by E. A. Buchanan, 174-202. Hershey, PA : Information Science Publishing.
95.
----. 2004b. "Seeing and sensing" online interaction: An interpretive interactionist approach to USENET support group research. In Online social research: Methods, issues, & ethics, edited by M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, and G. J. Hall, 81-97. New York: Peter Lang.
96.
Weckert, J.2000. What is new or unique about Internet activities? In Internet Ethics, edited by D. Langford , 47-64. New York: St. Martin's Press.
97.
Weissman, Jacqueline P.1970. Stations of the lost: The treatment of skid row alcoholics . Chicago and London: Chicago.
98.
Wheeler, D.2001. New technologies, old culture: A look at women, gender, and the Internet in Kuwait. In Culture, technology, communication: Toward an intercultural global village, edited by C. Ess, 187-212. Albany: SUNY.
99.
White, M.2003. Too close to see: Men, women, and Webcams. New Media & Society5 (1): 7-28.
100.
Whitty, M.2002. Liar, liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in chat rooms. Computers in Human Behavior18:343-52.
101.
---. 2003. Cyber-flirting: Playing at love. Theory and Psychology13 (3): 339-57.
102.
---. 2004. Peering into online bedroom windows: Considering the ethical implications of investigating Internet relationships and sexuality. In Virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies, edited by E. A. Buchanan, 203-18. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
103.
Whitty, M., and J. Gavin.2001. Age/sex/location: Uncovering the social cues in the develop-mint of online relationships. CyberPsychology and Behavior4 (5): 623-30.
104.
Williams, J.P., and H. Copes.2005. How edge are you?: Constructing authentic identities and subcultural boundaries in a straightedge Internet forum. Symbolic Interaction28 (1): 67-89.
105.
Wise, J.M.2004. An immense and unexpected field of action. Cultural Studies18 (2/3): 424-42.
