This article examines a set of industries including financial investment, fashion, and culture that tend to predominate in certain cities such as New York and London. Using data on business establishments and wages for the United States and Canada, the author shows that these industries exhibit a very high level of spatial concentration and a related high level of wage variation among metropolitan areas. The author proposes that these industries are very cluster dependent because of an inherently rapid pace of product innovation. The implications of this for economic development analysis are considered in the context of cluster and innovation policy. The author suggests that fostering innovation in these industries requires a substantially different approach from that commonly being deployed for technology industries.
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 253-273.
2.
Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more?Research Policy, 27, 525-540.
3.
Beaverstock, J. V., Smith, R. G., & Taylor, P. J. (1999). A roster of world cities. Cities, 16(6), 445-458.
4.
Centre for the Study of Commercial Activity. (2003). Beyond anecdotal evidence, the spillover effects of investments in cultural facilities. Unpublished report, Ryerson University, Toronto. Retrieved November 10, 2005, from Toronto Artscape Web site: www.torontoartscape.on.ca/research/
5.
European Commission. (2004). Innovation in Europe, results for the EU, Iceland and Norway. Luxembourg, Belgium: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved January 27, 2006, from www.cordis/lu/innovationsmes/src/cis.htm
6.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Hill, E. W., & Brennan, J. F. (2000). A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: The foundation of regional competitive advantage. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 65-96.
8.
Maskell, P., & Lorenzen, M. (2003). The cluster as market organization (Working Paper No. 03-14). Frederiksberg, Denmark: Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics.
9.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1997). Oslo manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (2nd ed.). Paris: Author. Retrieved October 7, 2003, from OECD Web site: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/61/2367580.pdf
10.
Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.
11.
Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6&7), 549-578.
12.
Salazar, M., & Holbrook, A. (2003, November). A debate on innovation surveys. Paper presented at the conference What Do We Know About Innovation?University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K. Available at www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/events/KP_Conf_03/index.html
13.
Scott, A. J. (1997). The cultural economy of cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21(2), 323-339.
14.
Scott, A. J. (1999). The cultural economy: Geography and the creative field. Media, Culture & Society, 21(6), 807-817.
15.
Statistics Canada. (2000). Canadian business patterns, December 1999. Ottawa, Canada.
16.
Statistics Canada. (2001). Canadian business patterns, December 2000. Ottawa, Canada.
17.
Statistics Canada. (2002). Canadian business patterns, December 2001. Ottawa, Canada.
18.
Statistics Canada. (2004a). Canadian framework for culture statistics (Catalogue No. 81-595 no. 21). Ottawa, Canada.
19.
Statistics Canada. (2004c). Special aggregation: Information and communication technology (ICT). Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved January 27, 2006, from www.statcan.ca/english/Subjects/Standard/spec-aggreg/ict-1997/ict97-menu.htm
20.
United Kingdom Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2004). DCMS evidence toolkit, technical report. London: Author. Available at www.culture.gov.uk/global/research/det/7_full_Technical_Report.htm
21.
United Kingdom Department of Trade and Industry. (2001). Business clusters in the UK-A first assessment (Unique Reference Numbers 01/573 and 01/574). Department of Trade and Industry Publications Unit. Retrieved January 27, 2006, from Department of Trade and Industry Web site: www.dti.gov.uk/clusters/map/
22.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001, May). County business patterns, 1998-99. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Commerce.
23.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002, July). County business patterns, 1999-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
24.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003, April). County business patterns, 2000-2001. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Commerce.
25.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2003). Regional economic information system 1969-2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
26.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2001). Census of employment and wages. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved June 23, 2005, from Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site: www.bls.gov/cew/
27.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2002). Census 2000 (Table GCT-PH1 Population, housing units, area, and density: 2000). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved March 22, 2005, from http://factfinder.census.gov
28.
Wolfe, D. A. (2000). Social capital and cluster development in learning regions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Innovation Systems Research Network, Montreal, and at the 18th World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Québec City, Canada.
