The Evolution of Regional Industry Clusters and Their Implications for Sustainable Economic Development

Abstract

The ability to detect embryonic yet dynamic industry cluster changes can help regional decision makers proactively create strategic initiatives that support value-based development. This article examines cluster trends in California's central San Joaquin Valley and northeast Indiana through the introduction of quantitative methods that detect microchanges in cluster development. These methods capture whether a region's clusters are evolving and, if so, how they are changing. Built on the foundation of traditional quantitative cluster analysis techniques, these additional screening methods can capture entrepreneurial and innovative activity within the industry cluster context at an earlier stage than traditional methods can. This approach can provide industry sector clues as to what may drive future cluster development, both positive and negative, and it can offer early-stage opportunities to assess job quality and productivity to help determine the sustainability of new cluster developments.

Keywords

industry clusters cluster methodology entrepreneurship development regional industry assessment sustainable cluster development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asheim, B.T. , & Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration, and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway. European Planning Studies , 5(3), 299-330.

Bergman, E.M. , & Feser, E.J. (1997, October 10-11). Industrial, regional or spatial clustering? Workshop position paper on Cluster Analyses and Cluster-based Policies. Amsterdam: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.

Bergman, E.M. , & Feser, E.J. (2000). National industry cluster templates: A framework for applied regional cluster analysis. Regional Studies, 34(1), 1-19.

Colgan C. S., & Baker, C. (2003). A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: The foundation of regional competitive advantage. Economic Development Quarterly, 17, 352-366.

Cortright, J. (2006). Industry clusters: Definitions, analysis, action . Retrieved August, 15, 2007, from www.oregonclusters.org/Docs/Definition,%20Analysis,%20and%20Action.ppt

Finch, H. (2005). Comparison of distance measures in cluster analysis with dichotomous data. Journal of Data Science, 3, 85-100.

Finch, H. (2006). Comparison of the performance of varimax and promax rotations: Factor structure recovery for dichotomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(1), 39-52.

Henton, D. , Melville, J. , & Walesh, K. (2004). Civic revolutionaries: Igniting the passion for change in America's communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lundvall, B. (1996). National systems of innovation and input-output analysis. In C. DeBresson (Ed.), Economic interdependence and innovative activity (pp. 356-363). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

10.

Montana, J. (2005). Accelerating entrepreneurship in central Illinois: A catalyst for regional opportunity. Decatur, IL: Millikin University Tabor School of Entrepreneurship. Retrieved August 13, 2008, from http://millikinentrepreneurship.com/AcceleratingEntrepreneurship.php

11.

Porter, M.E. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications.

12.

Reamer, A. (2003). Technology transfer and commercialization: Their role in economic development. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration.

13.

Rosenfeld, S.A. (1997). Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development. European Planning Studies, 5(1), 3-23.

14.

San Diego Association of Governments. (1995 ). Understanding cluster analysis. Retrieved August 15, 2007, from http://www.sandag.cog.ca.us/rta/transfer/cluster_analysis.pdf

15.

Waits, M.J. (1995, Summer). Preparing for global competition through indus trial clusters. Spectrum, 34-37.