The purpose of this study was to determine if the outcomes of economic development result in the anticipated economic and social benefits.The authors differentiated between the proximal outcomes of development (e.g., attracting a new employer) and their distal outcomes (e.g., increased employment and income). Indicators of economic change from secondary sources were merged with primary data from resident surveys and key informants’ interviews for 99 small Iowa towns for the analyses. Findings show that the opening of absentee-owned employers had positive economic benefits compared to the situation in other similar towns. However, it was not accompanied by gains in quality of life. The growth of local capitalism was associated with more positive quality of life outcomes. New amenities were not associated with economic or quality of life changes.
Albrecht, D. ( 2004). Amenities, natural resources, economic restructuring, and socioeconomic outcomes in non-metroplitan America. Journal of the Community Development Society, 35(2), 36-52.
2.
Andrews, F.M., & Withey, S.B. ( 1976). Social indicators of well-being: Perceptions of quality of life. New York: Plenum Press .
3.
Argyle, M. ( 1996). Subjective well-being. In A. Offer (Ed.), In pursuit of the quality of life (pp. 18-45). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
Boothroyd, P., & Davis, H.C. ( 1993). Community economic development: Three approaches. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12, 230-240.
5.
Corolleur, F., & Courlet, C. ( 2003). The Marshallian industrial district, an organizational and institutional answer to uncertainty. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5, 299-307.
6.
Deller, S.C., Tsai, T.H., Marcouiller, D.W., & English, D.B.K. (2001). The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 352-365.
7.
Dillman, D. ( 1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method . New York: Wiley.
8.
Dillman, D. ( 2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
9.
Economic Research Service. (2005). Rural America at a glance, 2005 (Economic information bulletin No. 4). Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
10.
Falk, W.W., & Lobao, L.M. ( 2003). Who benefits from economic restructuring? Lessons from the past, challenges for the future. In D. L. Brown & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 152-161). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press .
Glasmeier, A.K., & Howland, M. ( 1995). From combines to computers: Rural services and development in the age of information technology. New Brunswick, NJ : Center for Urban Policy Research.
15.
Goe, W.R., & Green, G.P. ( 2005). Amenities and change in the well-being of non-metropolitan localities. In G. P. Green, S. C. Deller, & D. W. Marcouiller (Eds.), Amenities and rural development: Theory, methods, and public policy (pp. 95-112). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
16.
Goldschmidt, W. ( 1946). Small business and the community: A study in the central valley of California on the effects of scale of farm operations. Report of the Special Committee to Study Problems of American Small Business. U.S. Senate, 79th Congress, 2nd session, Committee Print 13. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
Goodman, D.J. ( 2003). Are economic development incentives worth it? A computable general equilibrium analysis of Pueblo, Colorado’s efforts to attract business. The Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 33, 43-56.
18.
Gottlieb, P.D. ( 1994). Amenities as an economic development tool: Is there enough evidence? Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 270-285.
19.
Green, G.P. ( 2005). What role can community play in local economic development . In D. L. Brown & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 343-353). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
20.
Green, G.P., Fleischmann, A., & Kwong, T.M. ( 1996). The effectiveness of local economic development policies in the 1980s. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 609-617.
21.
Hunter, L. M., Boardman, J. D., & Saint Onge, J. M. ( 2005). The association between natural amenities, rural population growth, and long-term residents’ economic well-being. Rural Sociology, 70, 452-469.
22.
Johnson, K.M. ( 2003). Unpredictable directions of rural population growth and migration. In D. L. Brown & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 19-31). University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.
23.
Johnson, K.M., & Beale, C. ( 1994). The recent revival of widespread population growth in non-metropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociology , 4, 655-667.
24.
Lyson, T.A., & Tolbert, C.M. ( 1996). Small manufacturing and nonmetropolitan socioeconomic well-being. Environment and Planning-A, 28, 1779-1794.
25.
McGranahan, D.A., & Wojan, T.R. ( 2007). Recasting the creative class to examine growth processes in rural and urban counties. Regional Studies, 41, 197-216.
26.
Mills, B., & Hazaiika, G. ( 2001). The migration of young adults from non-metropolitan counties . American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 329-340.
27.
Mills, C.W., & Ulmer, M.J. ( 1946). Small business and civic welfare. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
28.
Piore, M.J., & Sabel, C.F. ( 1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity . New York: Basic Books.
29.
Porell, F.W. ( 1982). Intermetropolitan migration and quality of life. Journal of Regional Science, 22, 31-32.
30.
Pyke, F., & Sengenberger, W. (Eds.). (1992). Industrial districts and local economic regeneration. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute of Labour Studies.
31.
Rork, J.C. ( 2005). Getting what you pay for: The case of southern economic development. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 35, 37-49.
32.
Shaffer, R., Deller, S., & Marcouiller, D. (2006). Rethinking community economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 59-74.
33.
Sharp, J.S., Agnitsch, K., Ryan, V., & Flora, J. ( 2002). Social infrastructure and community economic development strategies: The case of self-development and industrial recruitment in rural Iowa. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 405-417.
34.
Shields, M., Goetz, S.J., & Wang, Q. ( 2005). Out-migration from the Northeast U.S.: The relative roles of economic and amenity differentials. In G. P. Green, S. C. Deller, & D. W. Marcouiller (Eds.), Amenities and rural development: Theory, methods, and public policy (pp. 78-94). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
35.
Sirgy, M.J., & Cornwell, T. ( 2001). Further validation of the Sirgy et al.’s measure of community quality of life. Social Indicators Research , 56, 125-143.
36.
Sirgy, M.J., Rahtz, D.R., Cicic, M., & Underwood, R. ( 2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: A quality of life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49, 279-316.
37.
Stone, W. ( 2001). Measuring social capital: Towards a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life (Research paper No. 24). Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
38.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). Decennial census. STF3 multiple tables. Prepared by State Library of Iowa, State Data Center.
39.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Decennial census. SF1 multiple tables. Prepared by State Library of Iowa, State Data Center.
40.
Whitener, L.A., & Parker, T. ( 2005, April). Policy options for a changing rural America. Amber Waves, 3(2).
41.
Zimmerman, J., Ham, S., & Frank, M.F. ( 2008). Does it or doesn’t it: Geographic differences and the costs of living. Rural Sociology, 73, 463-486.
