In what ways do research universities interact with regional economies? The answer to this central question can be found in a framework of the interaction of university products and necessary factors for technology-based economic development. The bundled nature of university products makes it impossible to separately assess the impact of universities on their regional economies. The National Science Foundation’s ranking of top research universities and retrospective data on academic R&D expenditures are used in regression models to measure universities’ long-term effects over the phases of the latest business cycle. The pattern of statistical significance and the signs of the regression coefficients suggest that the presence of research universities has a positive effect on metropolitan economies above cyclical economic changes. The effect differs depending on the scale of university R&D expenditures and suggests that the most prominent research universities have a stronger impact on their regional economies.
Acs, Z.J., FitzRoy, F.R., & Smith, I. ( 1995). High technology employment, wages and university R&D spillovers: Evidence from U.S. cities. Retrieved from http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers95/acs.htm
2.
Adams, J.D. ( 2001). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers (NBER Working Paper No. 8292). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8292.pdf
3.
Adams, J.D., Chiang, E.P., & Starkey, K. ( 2001). Industry-university cooperative research centers . Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 73-86.
4.
Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. ( 1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630-640.
5.
Audretsch, D., & Stephan, P. ( 1996). Company-scientist locational link: The case of biotechnology . American Economic Review, 86, 641-652.
6.
Bania, N., Eberts, R., & Fogarty, M. ( 1993). Universities and the start-up of new companies: Can we generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 761-766.
7.
Beeson, P., & Montgomery, E. (1993). The effects of colleges and universities on local labor markets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 753-760.
8.
Berglund, D., & Clarke, M. ( 2000). Using research and development to grow state economies . Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association.
9.
Cortright, J., & Mayer, H. ( 2002). Signs of life: The growth of biotechnology centers in the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
10.
Coupe, T. ( 2003). Revealed performances: Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments 1969-2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 1309-1345.
11.
Edmiston, K. ( 2004). The net effects of large plant locations and expansions on county employment. Journal of Regional Science, 44, 289-320.
12.
Etzkowitz, H. ( 2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information , 42, 293-337.
13.
Feller, I. ( 1990). Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy, 19, 335-348.
14.
Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Schenkman J., & Shleifer, A. ( 1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126-1152.
15.
Goldstein, H., & Drucker, J. ( 2006). The economic development impacts of universities on regions: Do size and distance matter? Economic Development Quarterly , 20, 22-43.
16.
Goldstein, H., Maier, G., & Luger, M. ( 1995). The university as an instrument for economic and business development: U.S. and European comparisons. In D. D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly (pp. 105-133). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
17.
Goldstein, H., & Renault, C. ( 2004). Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasi-experimental approach. Regional Studies , 38, 733-746.
18.
Gottlieb, P. ( 2001). The problem of brain drain in Ohio and North-eastern Ohio: What is it? How severe is it? What should we do about it?Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University, Center for Regional Economic Issues, Weatherhead School of Management.
19.
Hill, E., & Lendel, I. ( 2007, October). The impact of the reputation of bio-life science and engineering doctoral programs on regional economic development . Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 223-243.
20.
Hoffman, D. ( 2007). A strategic assessment of the economic benefits of investments in research in Arizona. Paper presented at the SSTI’s 11th annual conference "Transforming Regional Economies,"Baltimore, MD.
21.
Huggins, R. ( 1999). Embedding inward investment through work-force development: Experience in Wales (Papers in Planning Research). Cardiff : University of Wales, Department of City and Regional Planning.
22.
Humphreys, J. ( 2008). The economic impact of university system of Georgia institutions on their regional economies in FY 2007. Retrieved from http://www.icapp.org/pubs/usg_impact_fy2007.pdf
23.
Innis, H. ( 1950). Empire and communications. Oxford , England: Oxford University Press.
24.
Innis, H. ( 1951). The bias of communications. Toronto , Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
25.
Leef, G., & Sanders, J. ( 2000). Is spending on higher education really correlated to growth?Clarion, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.popecenter.org/clarion/2000/sept-oct/cover.html
26.
Leistritz, F., & Coon, R. ( 2007). Economic impact of the North Dakota University System . Retrieved from http://www.ndus.nodak.edu/Upload/allfile.asp?id=778&tbl=MultiUse
27.
Lendel, I. V., Allen, P., & Feldman, M. ( 2009). University-based economic growth. In M. Tight, J. Huisman , K. H. Mok, & C. Morphew (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 381-396). New York, England: Routledge.
28.
Lester, R. ( 2005). Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies: Summary report from the local innovation project (MIT-IPC-05-010) . Cambridge: MIT, Industrial Performance Center.
29.
Link, A.L., & Rees, J. ( 1990). Firm size, university based research, and the return to R&D. Small Business Economics, 2, 25-31.
30.
Luger, M., & Koo, J. ( 2005). Defining and tracking business start-ups. Small Business Economics, 24, 17-28.
31.
Macri, J., & Sinha, D. ( 2006). Rankings methodology for international comparisons of institutions and individuals: An application to economics in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 111-156.
32.
Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Makikangas, A., & Natti, J. ( 2005). Psychological consequences of fixed-term employment and perceived job insecurity amongst health care staff. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 209-237.
33.
Miller, A., Tien, C., & Peebler, A. ( 1996). Departmental rankings: An alternative approach . Political Science and Politics, 29, 704-717.
34.
Mizzou, University of Missouri. (2008). The Mizzou impact. Retrieved from http://www.missouri.edu/impact/
35.
Morgan, B. ( 2002). Higher education and regional economic department in Wales: An opportunity for demonstrating the efficacy of devolution in economic development. Regional Studies, 36, 65-73.
36.
Nelson, R. ( 1986). Institutions supporting technical advance in industry . American Economic Review, 76, 186-189.
37.
Phelps, N. ( 1997). Multinationals and European integration: Trade, investment and regional development. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
38.
Polanyi, M. ( 1962). Tacit knowledge: Its bearing on some problems of philosophy . Reviews of Modern Physics, 34, 601-616.
39.
Polanyi, M. ( 1966). The tacit dimension. New York, NY : Double-day.
40.
Romer, P. ( 1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
41.
Scibany, A., Schartinger, D., Plot, W., & Rammer, C. ( 2000). Evidence of interactive relations between the academic sector and industry. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/s_t/index.htm
42.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie L. ( 1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
Smith, A. ( 1776). Wealth of nations. In C. J. Bullock (Ed.), The Harvard classics (Vol. X). New York, NY: P. F. Collier & Son .
44.
St. Mary’s University. (2003). Retrieved from http://www.stmarytx.edu/impact/pdf/economic_impact.pdf
45.
Stokes, K. ( 2007). The economic impact of Thomas University on Southwest Georgia. Retrieved from http://www.thomasu.edu/pdf/2007_economic_impact.pdf
46.
Tornatzky, L., Waugaman, P., & Bauman, J. ( 1997). Benchmarking university-industry technology transfer in the South: 1995-1996 data. Research Triangle Park, NC : Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
47.
Tornatzky, L., Waugaman, P., & Casson, L. ( 1995). Benchmarking university-industry technology transfer in the South: 1993-1994 data. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
48.
Tornatzky, L., Waugaman, P., & Gray, D. ( 1999). Industry-university technology transfer: Models of alternative practice, policy, and program. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
49.
Tornatzky, L., Waugaman P., & Gray, D. ( 2002). Innovation U.: New university roles in a knowledge economy . Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
50.
Webster, T. ( 2001). A principal component analysis of the U.S. News & World Report tier rankings of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 20, 235-244.
51.
Young, A.A. ( 1999). Money and growth: Selected papers of Allyn Abbott Young . London, England: Routledge .
